Finance Minister Assures States Share in Higher Cigarette Duties
The Finance Minister stated that higher duties collected on cigarettes will be shared with states, addressing concerns about fiscal federalism.
Photo by Brendan Stephens
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has assured that any additional duties collected on cigarettes will be shared with state governments. This statement addresses concerns raised by states regarding their share in central taxes, particularly after the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
The move to impose higher duties on cigarettes is often driven by public health objectives to discourage tobacco consumption. By committing to share these revenues, the Centre aims to maintain fiscal federalism and ensure states have adequate resources, while also pursuing health-related policy goals.
मुख्य तथ्य
FM assured states will share in higher cigarette duties.
Addresses concerns about fiscal federalism and state revenue.
Higher duties often for public health objectives (discourage tobacco).
UPSC परीक्षा के दृष्टिकोण
Constitutional provisions related to Centre-State financial relations (Articles 268-280).
Working of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its impact on fiscal federalism.
Role and recommendations of the Finance Commission.
Distinction between taxes, cesses, and surcharges and their implications for revenue sharing.
Public health policy objectives linked to taxation (sin taxes/demerit good taxes).
Challenges and reforms in Indian fiscal federalism.
दृश्य सामग्री
Evolution of GST & State Revenue Concerns in India
This timeline illustrates key milestones in the implementation of GST and related developments concerning state revenues, providing context for the Finance Minister's assurance regarding cigarette duties.
The implementation of GST was a landmark tax reform, but it centralized indirect tax powers, leading to state concerns about revenue autonomy. The initial compensation mechanism provided a buffer, but its expiry in 2022 intensified these concerns. The Centre's assurance to share additional duties on cigarettes is a direct response to these fiscal federalism challenges, especially regarding non-divisible cesses.
- 2000GST first proposed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee government (Kelkar Task Force later recommended it in 2003)
- 2016Constitution (101st Amendment) Act passed, paving the way for GST
- 2017 (July 1)Goods and Services Tax (GST) implemented across India
- 2017GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 enacted, assuring states compensation for 5 years for revenue loss
- 202015th Finance Commission (2020-25) recommendations on tax devolution (41% share to states)
- 2022 (June)GST compensation cess period for states officially ended, raising concerns about state fiscal autonomy
- Current NewsFM assures states' share in higher cigarette duties, addressing ongoing revenue concerns post-GST compensation
और जानकारी
पृष्ठभूमि
Fiscal federalism has been a cornerstone of India's governance, with the Constitution outlining mechanisms for revenue sharing between the Centre and states. The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in 2017 marked a significant shift, subsuming various central and state indirect taxes into a unified system.
While aimed at simplifying taxation and boosting economic efficiency, GST also centralized much of the indirect tax revenue collection, leading to concerns among states about their fiscal autonomy and revenue certainty. The GST Compensation Cess was introduced to address states' revenue losses for a period, but its eventual sunset and the Centre's increasing reliance on cesses and surcharges (which do not form part of the divisible pool) have reignited debates on Centre-State financial relations.
नवीनतम घटनाक्रम
बहुविकल्पीय प्रश्न (MCQ)
1. With reference to the recent assurance by the Finance Minister regarding sharing of additional duties on cigarettes, consider the following statements: 1. The assurance addresses concerns of states regarding their share in central taxes post-GST implementation. 2. Such additional duties are primarily imposed to generate revenue for the central government's discretionary spending. 3. The sharing mechanism for these additional duties would typically fall under the mandatory recommendations of the Finance Commission. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
उत्तर देखें
सही उत्तर: A
Statement 1 is correct, as the news explicitly states the assurance addresses concerns raised by states regarding their share in central taxes, particularly after GST. Statement 2 is incorrect; the news clearly mentions 'public health objectives to discourage tobacco consumption' as the driver for higher duties, not primarily central government's discretionary spending. Statement 3 is incorrect; if these 'additional duties' are levied as a cess or surcharge (which is common for such items), they do not form part of the divisible pool of taxes and are therefore outside the mandatory sharing recommendations of the Finance Commission. The FM's assurance implies a specific, possibly voluntary, sharing mechanism.
2. Consider the following statements regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime in India: 1. GST Compensation Cess is levied on certain demerit goods and luxury items to compensate states for revenue loss due to GST implementation. 2. The revenue collected from GST Compensation Cess forms part of the Consolidated Fund of India and is mandatorily shared with states as per Article 270 of the Constitution. 3. A 'surcharge' levied by the Parliament under Article 271 on certain taxes is not shared with the states. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
उत्तर देखें
सही उत्तर: C
Statement 1 is correct. GST Compensation Cess was indeed levied on specific goods to compensate states for the revenue shortfall arising from the transition to GST. Statement 2 is incorrect. While the cess revenue forms part of the Consolidated Fund of India, it is specifically earmarked for compensating states for GST revenue loss and is not part of the divisible pool shared with states as per Article 270. Article 270 deals with the distribution of taxes that are levied and collected by the Union and which are compulsorily shared. Statement 3 is correct. Article 271 allows Parliament to levy a surcharge on certain duties and taxes, and the entire proceeds of such a surcharge go exclusively to the Union, not shared with states.
3. In the context of Centre-State financial relations in India, which of the following statements is NOT correct? A) The Finance Commission recommends the distribution of net proceeds of taxes between the Union and the States. B) Duties and taxes referred to in Articles 268, 269, and 269A are assigned to the states and do not form part of the divisible pool. C) The Parliament can levy a cess for specific purposes, and the proceeds of such a cess are compulsorily shared with states if it is collected on a tax that is otherwise part of the divisible pool. D) Grants-in-aid to states are provided from the Consolidated Fund of India, both statutory and discretionary.
उत्तर देखें
सही उत्तर: C
Statement A is correct. The Finance Commission's primary role is to recommend the vertical (Centre to states) and horizontal (among states) distribution of the divisible pool of taxes. Statement B is correct. Articles 268 (duties levied by Union but collected and appropriated by states), 269 (taxes levied and collected by Union but assigned to states), and 269A (GST on inter-state trade, collected by Union but apportioned between Union and states) describe taxes that are not part of the divisible pool for general sharing. Statement C is NOT correct. Cesses are levied for specific purposes and their proceeds are generally not shared with states, even if collected on a tax that is otherwise part of the divisible pool. This is a major reason for states' concerns about the shrinking divisible pool. Statement D is correct. Grants-in-aid are provided from the Consolidated Fund of India, with statutory grants recommended by the Finance Commission (Article 275) and discretionary grants by the Centre (Article 282).
संबंधित लेख
चावल किलेबंदी योजना निलंबित; कार्यकर्ताओं ने कदम का समर्थन किया
India and Brazil Sign MoU for Rare Earth Minerals
भारतीय राज्य नारंगी अर्थव्यवस्था में विकास का पता लगाने के लिए उत्सुक हैं
केंद्र का ध्यान पीएसयू बेचने से हटकर संपत्ति मूल्य पर
बोलिवियाई विमान दुर्घटना में जमीन पर पड़े नोटों को जलाने पर निवासियों का विरोध