For this article:

19 Feb 2026·Source: The Hindu
4 min
Polity & GovernanceEconomyScience & TechnologyEDITORIAL

India's 'Third Way' for AI Governance: Balancing Innovation and Global South Needs

India offers a unique AI governance model balancing innovation with Global South needs.

Editorial Analysis

India is uniquely positioned to offer a "Third Way" for AI governance that balances innovation with the needs of the Global South. This approach emphasizes strategic autonomy, public-private partnerships, and governance tailored to the local context, offering an alternative path for nations seeking development pathways compatible with their strategic interests and institutional capacities. The success of this model hinges on integrating innovation, security, and human welfare.

Main Arguments:

  1. India is offering a “Third Way” for AI governance, recognizing that existing strategies from the EU, U.S., and China don't neatly transfer to the global majority due to different economic contexts and policy traditions.
  2. The Indian government released AI governance guidelines in November 2025, encompassing adoption, diffusion, diplomacy, and capacity-building, prioritizing scaling AI for inclusive development while working through existing legal structures.
  3. Amendments to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules mandate labeling AI-generated information and a three-hour takedown window for harmful content, marking the first instance of a government mandating AI-generation disclosure.
  4. India's approach emphasizes strategic autonomy, public-private partnerships, and governance tailored to the local context, offering an alternative path for nations seeking development pathways compatible with their strategic interests and institutional capacities.
  5. Governance coordination requires minimum measures to mandate transparency and accountability from AI developers, protect whistleblowers and vulnerable populations from adverse harms, and encourage public awareness and agency.

Conclusion

The next 12 months will determine whether India’s model can successfully integrate innovation, security, and human welfare or whether the gaps create the very instability that governance is meant to prevent. The choices India makes now will determine whether the “Third Way” becomes a model worth following.

Policy Implications

The article advocates for policy changes that mandate transparency and accountability from AI developers, protect whistleblowers and vulnerable populations from adverse harms, and encourage public awareness and agency.

With the AI Impact Summit underway, India is offering a “Third Way” for AI governance, recognizing opportunities for countries to enter AI markets while acknowledging that existing governance strategies do not transfer neatly to the global majority. In November 2025, the Indian government released its AI governance guidelines. The guidelines represent a distinctive approach: not merely a regulatory framework, but a governance framework encompassing adoption, diffusion, diplomacy, and capacity-building.

It prioritizes scaling AI for inclusive development while working through existing legal structures. On February 10, the government announced amendments to the Information Technology Rules, which make it mandatory for intermediary tools and platforms to label AI-generated information and impose a three-hour takedown window for harmful content. India’s approach emphasizes strategic autonomy, public-private partnerships, and governance tailored to the local context.

Key Facts

1.

India is offering a “Third Way” for AI governance.

2.

India's AI governance guidelines encompass adoption, diffusion, diplomacy, and capacity-building.

3.

The guidelines prioritize scaling AI for inclusive development.

4.

Amendments to IT rules mandate labeling AI-generated information.

5.

India emphasizes strategic autonomy and public-private partnerships.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: Governance, Polity, Social Justice - Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.

2.

Connects to the syllabus through the topic of technology governance and regulation, particularly in the context of emerging technologies like AI.

3.

Potential question types include statement-based MCQs on AI governance models, analytical questions on the challenges and opportunities of AI for developing countries, and essay questions on India's approach to AI governance.

In Simple Words

AI governance is like setting rules for how artificial intelligence is used. India wants to find its own way, different from the US or Europe. It wants to make sure AI helps everyone, not just a few, and that it's used responsibly.

India Angle

Think about AI being used in farming. It could help farmers predict the best time to plant crops, but it could also put them out of work if robots take over. India's approach wants to balance these things.

For Instance

It's like when your apartment complex decides to install security cameras. You want the security, but you also want to make sure your privacy is protected. AI governance is about finding that balance on a national level.

AI is going to change everything, from how you shop to how you get medical care. If the rules aren't right, it could make life harder for ordinary people.

AI should serve humanity, not the other way around.

Visual Insights

Key AI Governance Developments in India

Highlights key statistics and policy changes related to AI governance in India as per the news article.

Takedown Window for Harmful Content
3 hours

Ensures swift action against harmful AI-generated content, crucial for maintaining online safety and preventing misinformation.

More Information

Background

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) governance frameworks is a relatively recent phenomenon, gaining significant momentum in the last decade. Initially, discussions revolved around ethical guidelines and principles, but the focus has shifted towards more concrete regulatory measures. Different countries and regions have adopted varied approaches. The European Union, for example, is pursuing a comprehensive regulatory framework with the AI Act, emphasizing risk-based assessments and strict compliance standards. In contrast, the United States has favored a more sector-specific approach, relying on existing regulatory bodies to oversee AI applications within their respective domains. This approach emphasizes innovation and flexibility. China has also implemented regulations, focusing on data security and algorithmic transparency. India's 'Third Way' seeks to balance these approaches, drawing lessons from global experiences while adapting to its unique socio-economic context. This includes leveraging existing legal structures and prioritizing inclusive development. The Information Technology Act, 2000, is a key piece of legislation that provides the legal framework for governing electronic transactions and data protection in India. Amendments to this act, such as those mentioned in the news regarding AI-generated content labeling, demonstrate how existing legal structures are being adapted to address the challenges and opportunities presented by AI. The concept of strategic autonomy is also crucial, reflecting India's desire to shape its own AI governance framework independently, while also engaging with international norms and standards.

Latest Developments

In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on ethical AI and responsible AI development globally. Organizations like the OECD and UNESCO have issued guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. India has actively participated in these international discussions, contributing its perspective on the unique challenges and opportunities faced by developing countries. The establishment of the AI Impact Summit reflects a growing recognition of the need for global collaboration in shaping the future of AI. Furthermore, there has been increasing focus on data privacy and security in the context of AI. The Indian government's proposed Digital Personal Data Protection Act aims to establish a comprehensive framework for data protection, which will have significant implications for AI development and deployment. The emphasis on labeling AI-generated content and the three-hour takedown window for harmful content, as mentioned in the news, are indicative of the government's proactive approach to addressing potential risks associated with AI. Looking ahead, India is expected to play a more prominent role in shaping the global AI governance landscape. Its emphasis on strategic autonomy, public-private partnerships, and governance tailored to the local context could serve as a model for other developing countries. The success of India's 'Third Way' will depend on its ability to effectively balance innovation with responsible development and deployment of AI technologies.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is India's 'Third Way' for AI governance, and why is it significant?

India's 'Third Way' for AI governance balances innovation with the needs of the Global South. It's significant because it offers an alternative to existing governance strategies that may not be suitable for developing countries, prioritizing inclusive development and strategic autonomy.

2. What are the key components of India's AI governance guidelines?

India's AI governance guidelines encompass several key components:

  • Adoption: Encouraging the use of AI.
  • Diffusion: Spreading AI technology.
  • Diplomacy: Engaging in international discussions on AI.
  • Capacity-building: Developing skills and knowledge related to AI.
3. How do the recent amendments to the Information Technology Rules impact AI-generated content?

The amendments to the Information Technology Rules mandate that intermediary tools and platforms must label AI-generated information. This aims to increase transparency and help users distinguish between human-created and AI-created content.

4. What is the significance of the 'three-hour takedown window' for harmful AI content?

The three-hour takedown window for harmful AI content signifies the government's commitment to quickly address and remove potentially dangerous or misleading information generated by AI, ensuring public safety and minimizing the spread of misinformation.

5. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of India's approach to AI governance?

Potential benefits include fostering innovation, promoting inclusive development, and ensuring strategic autonomy. Drawbacks might involve challenges in implementation, potential for over-regulation, and the need for continuous adaptation to evolving AI technologies.

6. How does India's AI governance approach differ from that of the European Union?

While the European Union focuses on strict regulatory measures, India emphasizes a governance framework encompassing adoption, diffusion, diplomacy, and capacity-building. India prioritizes scaling AI for inclusive development while working through existing legal structures, while the EU takes a more direct regulatory approach.

7. What role do public-private partnerships play in India's AI governance strategy?

Public-private partnerships are crucial in India's AI governance strategy. They facilitate the sharing of resources, expertise, and infrastructure, enabling faster AI adoption and development while ensuring alignment with national priorities and ethical considerations.

8. What are the key dates and personalities associated with India's AI governance framework?

Key dates include November 2025, when the Indian government released its AI governance guidelines, and February 10, when amendments to the IT rules were announced. Key personalities include Uma Kalkar and Amlan Mohanty.

9. How can India's 'Third Way' in AI governance impact common citizens?

If implemented effectively, India's approach can lead to inclusive development, improved public services, and greater access to information. It can also empower citizens by promoting digital literacy and ensuring that AI benefits reach marginalized communities.

10. Why has AI governance become a prominent topic globally in recent years?

AI governance has gained prominence due to the rapid advancements in AI technology and its increasing impact on various aspects of society. Concerns about ethical considerations, bias, misinformation, and potential misuse have driven the need for effective governance frameworks.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding India's approach to AI governance: 1. It prioritizes scaling AI for inclusive development. 2. It relies solely on newly created legal structures for AI regulation. 3. It emphasizes strategic autonomy and public-private partnerships. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: India's AI governance approach prioritizes scaling AI for inclusive development, ensuring that the benefits of AI reach all sections of society. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: India's approach works through existing legal structures, adapting them to address AI-related issues rather than creating entirely new frameworks. Statement 3 is CORRECT: India's approach emphasizes strategic autonomy, allowing it to shape its own AI governance framework, and promotes public-private partnerships to foster innovation and development. Therefore, only statements 1 and 3 are correct.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News