For this article:

25 Dec 2025·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
Polity & GovernancePolity & GovernanceEconomyNEWS

Gujarat Revenue Official Arrested in PMLA Case, Collector Transferred

A Gujarat revenue official was arrested under PMLA for systematic extortion, leading to the collector's transfer.

Gujarat Revenue Official Arrested in PMLA Case, Collector Transferred

Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan

In a significant move against corruption, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested Chandrasinh Mori, a deputy mamlatdar in Surendranagar, Gujarat, for allegedly running a money laundering racket and systematically extorting bribes for land-use applications. The ED recovered ₹67.50 lakh in cash from Mori's residence. Following this, the Gujarat State Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) registered a case against Surendranagar Collector Rajendrakumar Patel, Mori, and two other staff members.

Consequently, Collector Patel was transferred. This case highlights the ongoing efforts to combat corruption in public administration and the stringent application of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against illicit financial activities, a critical aspect of governance and internal security.

मुख्य तथ्य

1.

Deputy mamlatdar Chandrasinh Mori arrested by ED

2.

Case registered under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

3.

₹67.50 lakh cash recovered from Mori's residence

4.

Surendranagar Collector Rajendrakumar Patel transferred

5.

Gujarat State Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) also registered a case

UPSC परीक्षा के दृष्टिकोण

1.

Powers and jurisdiction of Enforcement Directorate (ED) under PMLA.

2.

Role and structure of state Anti-Corruption Bureaus (ACBs).

3.

Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) - key provisions, scheduled offences, concept of 'proceeds of crime'.

4.

Challenges of corruption in public administration and governance.

5.

Accountability and transparency in district administration (role of Collector).

6.

Inter-agency coordination in combating financial crimes and corruption.

7.

Money laundering as a threat to internal security and economic stability.

दृश्य सामग्री

Gujarat Corruption Case: Location of Incident

This map highlights Surendranagar district in Gujarat, where the deputy mamlatdar was arrested by the ED in a PMLA case. It also marks Ahmedabad, the state capital, as a key administrative and investigative hub.

Loading interactive map...

📍Surendranagar📍Ahmedabad

Key Statistics: Gujarat Corruption Case & PMLA Context

This dashboard highlights the financial aspect of the Gujarat corruption case and provides broader context on the Enforcement Directorate's activities under PMLA, reflecting the ongoing efforts against economic crimes.

Cash Recovered (Surendranagar)
₹67.50 Lakh

This significant amount recovered from a single deputy mamlatdar underscores the prevalence of petty corruption and illicit enrichment in public administration.

ED PMLA Cases Registered (India)
Increased Trend

The Enforcement Directorate has significantly ramped up investigations under PMLA, with a consistent increase in registered cases over the last few years, reflecting a stringent approach to economic offenses.

Value of Assets Attached by ED (India)
₹1.5 Lakh Crore+

Cumulatively, the ED has attached assets worth over ₹1.5 lakh crore under PMLA, demonstrating its effectiveness in recovering proceeds of crime and deterring illicit financial activities.

और जानकारी

पृष्ठभूमि

Corruption in public administration, particularly in land revenue departments, has been a persistent challenge in India. Historically, land records and revenue collection have been susceptible to malpractices due to complex procedures, lack of transparency, and discretionary powers.

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), enacted in 2002, gained significant teeth over the years through amendments, empowering agencies like the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to tackle financial crimes, including those arising from corruption, more stringently. The establishment of state-level Anti-Corruption Bureaus (ACBs) and central bodies like the CBI and CVC further strengthens the anti-corruption framework.

नवीनतम घटनाक्रम

The arrest of a deputy mamlatdar by the ED under PMLA for alleged money laundering and extortion in land-use applications, followed by an ACB case against the Collector and subsequent transfer, highlights the multi-pronged approach to combating corruption. It demonstrates the active role of central agencies (ED) alongside state agencies (ACB) in addressing graft, particularly when illicit funds are involved. The application of PMLA signifies a shift towards targeting the 'proceeds of crime' rather than just the act of bribery, adding a significant deterrent.

बहुविकल्पीय प्रश्न (MCQ)

1. With reference to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, consider the following statements: 1. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is the primary agency responsible for enforcing the PMLA. 2. Money laundering is defined as an independent offence under PMLA, irrespective of the predicate offence. 3. The Act allows for provisional attachment of property for a period not exceeding 180 days, which can be confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Statement 1 is correct. The ED, under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, is the primary agency for enforcing PMLA. Statement 2 is incorrect. Money laundering under PMLA is not an independent offence; it is always linked to a 'scheduled offence' (also known as a predicate offence). Without a scheduled offence, there can be no money laundering under PMLA. Statement 3 is correct. Section 5(1) of PMLA allows for provisional attachment of property for a period not exceeding 180 days, which can be confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority.

2. Consider the following statements regarding anti-corruption mechanisms in India: 1. The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is a constitutional body established to inquire into offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. State Anti-Corruption Bureaus (ACBs) derive their powers from the state governments and primarily investigate corruption cases involving state government employees. 3. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigates economic offences and money laundering, reporting directly to the Ministry of Home Affairs. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Statement 1 is incorrect. The CVC is a statutory body, not a constitutional body, established under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. It supervises vigilance administration and advises on corruption matters, but does not directly inquire into offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act in the same way an investigative agency does. Statement 2 is correct. ACBs are state-level investigative agencies, typically under the administrative control of the state's Home Department or General Administration Department, and are empowered to investigate corruption cases involving state government officials. Statement 3 is incorrect. The ED reports to the Department of Revenue under the Ministry of Finance, not the Ministry of Home Affairs.

3. In the context of public administration and accountability, which of the following statements is NOT correct regarding the role of a District Collector/Magistrate in India?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: C

Statement A is correct. Land revenue administration is a core function of the Collector. Statement B is correct. The District Magistrate has significant powers under CrPC for law and order. Statement C is incorrect. The transfer of a District Collector (an IAS officer) is decided by the respective State Government, in consultation with the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) for All India Services officers, not solely by the UPSC. UPSC is primarily involved in recruitment. Statement D is correct. The Collector is the pivot of district administration, coordinating all government activities.

4. Which of the following best describes the primary objective of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in India?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Option A is primarily covered by the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, although PMLA can be invoked if bribe money is laundered. Option B correctly identifies the core objectives of PMLA: to prevent money laundering, confiscate 'proceeds of crime' (property derived from or involved in money laundering), and to combat terrorism financing, which often relies on laundered funds. Option C is primarily covered by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). Option D is related to international legal frameworks, not the primary objective of PMLA itself, though PMLA does have provisions for international cooperation.

GKSolverआज की खबरें