For this article:

27 Feb 2026·Source: The Hindu
4 min
RS
Ritu Singh
|Northeast India
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesNEWS

Manipur Violence Inquiry Commission Faces Leadership Change

Justice Ajai Lamba resigns from Manipur inquiry; Justice Balbir Singh Chauhan appointed.

Manipur Violence Inquiry Commission Faces Leadership Change

Photo by Julian Yu

Balbir Singh Chauhan, a former Supreme Court judge, has replaced Ajai Lamba, the former Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court, as chairperson of the commission investigating the Manipur ethnic violence. Justice Lamba resigned from his position citing personal reasons. The commission was initially formed in June 2023 to investigate the causes and extent of the violence, the sequence of events, and any lapses by responsible authorities. It has received approximately 11,000 affidavits and has been granted multiple extensions. The ethnic violence in Manipur has resulted in around 250 deaths and the displacement of over 60,000 people.

This leadership change occurs as the commission continues its inquiry into the deeply troubling events in Manipur. The investigation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to the violence and to identify any failures in the response. The large number of affidavits submitted indicates the widespread impact of the violence on the population.

The findings of this commission will be crucial for informing future policy decisions and ensuring accountability. The change in leadership underscores the ongoing commitment to thoroughly investigate the Manipur violence. This news is relevant for UPSC aspirants, particularly for the Polity and Governance sections of the exam (GS Paper II).

Key Facts

1.

Ajai Lamba resigned as chairperson.

2.

Balbir Singh Chauhan is the new chairperson.

3.

The commission was formed in June 2023.

4.

The commission has received around 11,000 affidavits.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: Polity and Governance - Commissions of Inquiry, Constitutional provisions related to fundamental rights and state responsibility.

2.

GS Paper III: Internal Security - Linkage between development and spread of extremism, causes and spread of ethnic violence.

3.

GS Paper IV: Ethics - Accountability and ethical governance in conflict situations.

In Simple Words

A committee was formed to investigate the violence in Manipur. The head of this committee has now stepped down. A new judge will take over to continue the investigation.

India Angle

In India, such investigations are important to ensure justice and fairness, especially when there are conflicts between different communities. It affects how people trust the government and the legal system.

For Instance

Think of it like when your apartment complex has a dispute, and they hire an investigator. If the first investigator quits, they need to find another one to finish the job and find out what really happened.

It's important because these investigations can help prevent future violence and ensure that those responsible are held accountable, contributing to a more peaceful society.

Leadership changes, but the pursuit of truth and justice continues.

Ajai Lamba, former Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court, has resigned as chairperson of the commission investigating the Manipur ethnic violence. Balbir Singh Chauhan, former Supreme Court judge, will replace him. Justice Lamba cited personal reasons for his departure.

The commission, formed in June 2023, has been granted multiple extensions and has received approximately 11,000 affidavits. The commission is tasked with investigating the causes and extent of the violence, the sequence of events, and any lapses by responsible authorities. The ethnic violence in Manipur has resulted in around 250 deaths and the displacement of over 60,000 people.

Expert Analysis

The recent leadership change in the commission investigating the Manipur violence highlights the complexities and importance of such inquiries. To fully understand this news, several key concepts need to be considered, including the nature and purpose of commissions of inquiry, the legal framework governing them, and the socio-political context of ethnic violence.

The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 provides the legal framework for establishing commissions of inquiry by the central or state governments in India. These commissions are typically set up to investigate matters of public importance, such as the Manipur violence. The Act grants these commissions powers to summon witnesses, demand evidence, and conduct thorough investigations. The findings of a commission are advisory in nature, but they carry significant weight and can influence policy decisions and legal proceedings. In the context of the Manipur violence, the commission's role is to ascertain the facts, identify lapses, and recommend measures to prevent recurrence. The resignation of Justice Lamba and the appointment of Justice Chauhan do not alter the commission's mandate under this Act.

Another crucial concept is Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. In cases of widespread violence and displacement, the state's failure to protect its citizens' lives and livelihoods can be seen as a violation of this fundamental right. The Manipur violence, resulting in approximately 250 deaths and the displacement of over 60,000 people, raises serious questions about the state's ability to uphold Article 21. The commission's investigation will likely examine whether the state took adequate measures to prevent and control the violence, and whether any systemic failures contributed to the loss of life and displacement.

Finally, the concept of ethnic conflict itself is central to understanding the Manipur situation. Ethnic conflicts often arise from historical grievances, competition over resources, and political marginalization. In Manipur, the tensions between different ethnic communities have deep roots, and the recent violence is a manifestation of these underlying issues. The commission's investigation will need to delve into the historical and socio-economic factors that have fueled ethnic tensions in the state. Understanding the dynamics of ethnic conflict is essential for formulating effective strategies for peacebuilding and reconciliation. For UPSC aspirants, understanding these concepts is crucial for both prelims and mains, particularly in the context of polity, governance, and social issues.

Visual Insights

Key Statistics of Manipur Violence

Dashboard highlighting the key statistics related to the Manipur violence as reported in the news.

Estimated Deaths
250

Highlights the human cost of the ethnic violence. Important for understanding the scale of the crisis.

Displaced People
60,000+

Indicates the extent of the humanitarian crisis and the need for rehabilitation efforts.

Affidavits Received by Commission
11,000

Shows the level of public engagement with the inquiry process.

Manipur: Location of Ethnic Violence

Map highlighting Manipur, the location of the recent ethnic violence, with key details.

Loading interactive map...

📍Manipur
More Information

Background

Commissions of Inquiry in India are established under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. This Act empowers the government to appoint a commission to investigate any definite matter of public importance. The purpose is to gather facts, identify causes, and recommend measures for improvement. These commissions are ad-hoc bodies, meaning they are formed for a specific purpose and dissolve after submitting their report. The context of the Manipur violence is rooted in long-standing ethnic tensions between the Meitei community, who predominantly reside in the Imphal Valley, and the Kuki and other tribal communities living in the surrounding hills. These tensions have periodically erupted into violence, often triggered by disputes over land, resources, and political representation. The current crisis, which began in May 2023, is one of the most severe in recent years, leading to significant loss of life and widespread displacement. Article 355 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Union government to protect states against internal disturbance. In the case of Manipur, the Union government has invoked this article, deploying central forces to assist the state government in maintaining law and order. The ongoing inquiry commission is part of the efforts to address the root causes of the violence and prevent future occurrences.

Latest Developments

In recent years, there have been several attempts to address the underlying issues in Manipur through dialogue and development initiatives. However, these efforts have often been hampered by a lack of trust between the communities and a history of broken promises. The Supreme Court has also intervened in matters related to the violence, seeking reports on relief and rehabilitation efforts.

The central government has emphasized its commitment to restoring peace and normalcy in Manipur. Various measures have been taken to provide relief to the displaced population and to facilitate dialogue between the warring communities. The appointment of a new chairperson to the inquiry commission signals a continued focus on investigating the causes of the violence and holding those responsible accountable.

Looking ahead, the commission's report will be crucial in shaping future policy decisions and reconciliation efforts in Manipur. The recommendations are expected to address issues such as land rights, political representation, and economic development. The success of these efforts will depend on the willingness of all stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue and to address the root causes of the conflict.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What's the most likely Prelims question they'd ask about this Manipur violence inquiry?

UPSC might ask about the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, under which this commission was formed. They could present a statement like: 'Commissions of Inquiry are constitutional bodies with the power to enforce fundamental rights.' This is incorrect; they are statutory, not constitutional, and primarily fact-finding bodies.

Exam Tip

Remember: Commissions of Inquiry are NOT constitutional bodies. They are formed by the government under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952.

2. Why did Justice Ajai Lamba resign now, so soon after the commission was formed in June 2023?

Justice Lamba resigned citing personal reasons. While the exact reasons are not public, it's not uncommon for individuals to step down from such positions due to workload, health concerns, or other commitments. The timing is notable, but without further information, it's difficult to speculate on the specific cause.

3. How does this leadership change affect the commission's investigation into the Manipur violence?

A leadership change can potentially cause delays as the new chairperson, Justice Balbir Singh Chauhan, needs time to familiarize himself with the case, review the 11,000 affidavits received, and understand the progress made so far. However, the commission's mandate remains the same: to investigate the causes and extent of the violence and identify any lapses by authorities.

4. What is the role of the Central Government in this Commission of Inquiry?

The Central Government, under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, has the power to appoint such a commission to investigate any matter of public importance. While the commission operates independently, the government receives its report and is responsible for acting on its recommendations. The central government has also emphasized its commitment to restoring peace in Manipur.

5. If I were asked in an interview about the Manipur violence, how can I present a balanced view without taking sides?

You can acknowledge the complexities of the situation, highlighting the long-standing ethnic tensions and the breakdown of trust between communities. Emphasize the need for impartial investigation, accountability for those responsible for the violence, and a focus on long-term reconciliation and development initiatives. Acknowledge the government's efforts while also pointing out the need for greater community involvement and transparency.

6. How could this news about the Manipur violence inquiry be relevant to GS Paper 2 (Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International relations)?

This news directly relates to governance and polity. A question could address the effectiveness of Commissions of Inquiry in resolving conflicts and ensuring accountability. You could discuss the limitations of such commissions, the challenges in implementing their recommendations, and the need for a more comprehensive approach to address the root causes of ethnic violence. Mentioning Article 21 (Right to Life) and the state's responsibility to protect its citizens would also be relevant.

Exam Tip

When discussing Commissions of Inquiry, always link them to broader issues of governance, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952? 1. It empowers the Central Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry to investigate any matter of public importance. 2. The findings of a Commission of Inquiry are binding on the government. 3. A Commission of Inquiry can summon witnesses and demand evidence. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 empowers the Central Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry to investigate any definite matter of public importance. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: The findings of a Commission of Inquiry are advisory in nature and not binding on the government. The government may choose to accept or reject the recommendations. Statement 3 is CORRECT: A Commission of Inquiry has the power to summon witnesses and demand evidence to conduct a thorough investigation.

2. In the context of the Manipur violence, consider the following statements: 1. Article 355 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Union government to protect states against external aggression. 2. The violence primarily involves conflict between the Meitei community and Kuki community. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.2 only
  • C.Both 1 and 2
  • D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is INCORRECT: Article 355 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Union government to protect states against INTERNAL disturbance, not external aggression. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The violence in Manipur primarily involves conflict between the Meitei community and the Kuki community.

3. The Ajai Lamba Commission, recently in news, is associated with the investigation of which of the following events?

  • A.2002 Gujarat Riots
  • B.1984 Anti-Sikh Riots
  • C.Manipur Ethnic Violence
  • D.Kandhamal Violence
Show Answer

Answer: C

The Ajai Lamba Commission was formed to investigate the Manipur ethnic violence that began in June 2023. The commission's mandate includes investigating the causes and extent of the violence, the sequence of events, and any lapses by responsible authorities.

Source Articles

RS

About the Author

Ritu Singh

Governance & Constitutional Affairs Analyst

Ritu Singh writes about Polity & Governance at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →

GKSolverToday's News