Analyzing BJP's Alleged Strategy of Fostering Division Among Minorities
Dana Ullman examines BJP's alleged divisive tactics targeting minority communities in India.
Editorial Analysis
The author analyzes the BJP's alleged strategy of pitting one minority group against another in India, arguing that this tactic is used to consolidate its Hindu nationalist base and weaken the opposition. The author suggests that this approach undermines social harmony and secular values, potentially leading to increased polarization and conflict within Indian society.
Main Arguments:
- The BJP is allegedly employing a strategy to pit minority groups against each other.
- This tactic is purportedly used to consolidate the BJP's Hindu nationalist base.
- The alleged strategy aims to weaken the opposition by creating divisions within minority communities.
- This approach is believed to undermine social harmony and secular values.
- The strategy may lead to increased polarization and conflict within Indian society.
In 2025, the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government in India was accused of vilifying religious minorities and expelling hundreds of Bengali-speaking Muslims and Rohingya refugees, labeling them as “illegal immigrants,” according to Human Rights Watch's World Report 2026. The report, released on February 4, 2026, also highlights a crackdown on government critics and pressure on the media to self-censor, leading to abuses by government officials and BJP supporters. A deadly attack in Jammu and Kashmir in April 2025, targeting Hindu tourists, resulted in a four-day armed conflict between India and Pakistan, during which Indian authorities suppressed dissent by briefly blocking independent media and arresting individuals for social media comments.
Hate speech, often linked to Hindu nationalist groups, and attacks against Muslims reportedly increased, with authorities carrying out unlawful demolitions of Muslim homes and properties, claiming they were illegally built or occupied by “illegal immigrants,” despite a Supreme Court ruling. In Ladakh in September 2025, police killed four people during protests demanding autonomy, leading to the temporary shutdown of mobile internet and the arrest of educator and climate activist Sonam Wangchuk under the National Security Act. Several activists, including students, remained jailed without charge under counterterrorism laws, while foreign funding laws and financial investigations were used to harass activists, civil society groups, and political opponents of the BJP.
The Election Commission also faced allegations of bias from opposition politicians and rights activists, including claims of voter fraud and inconsistencies in electoral rolls. Human Rights Watch urged Indian authorities to end discriminatory policies and hate speech against religious minorities, ensure justice for victims, and cease the harassment of civil society groups and political opponents. This situation raises concerns about the state of human rights and democracy in India, relevant for UPSC exams, particularly in GS Paper II (Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice and International relations).
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper II: Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice and International relations - specifically issues related to fundamental rights, minority rights, and the role of the judiciary.
Connects to the UPSC syllabus on fundamental rights (Articles 14, 15, 25), directive principles of state policy, and the role of the Supreme Court in protecting constitutional values.
Potential question types: Analytical questions on the balance between national security and individual liberties, critical evaluation of laws like UAPA and NSA, and the impact of religious polarization on governance.
In Simple Words
The article talks about how a political party might be trying to make different minority groups fight each other. It suggests this is done to make the party stronger and the people who disagree with them weaker. This kind of fighting can hurt how well people get along and can cause problems in society.
India Angle
In India, this could mean a political party tries to create tension between different religious or caste groups. This can affect how people vote, who gets jobs, and how safe people feel in their communities.
For Instance
Think of it like a school where the head student tries to get different groups of friends to argue so that no one can challenge their power.
It matters because when groups are divided, it's harder to solve problems together and build a fair society for everyone.
Dividing people weakens society.
Dana Ullman analyzes the BJP's alleged strategy of pitting one minority group against another in India. The article suggests that the BJP uses this tactic to consolidate its Hindu nationalist base and weaken the opposition.
Ullman argues that this approach undermines social harmony and secular values, potentially leading to increased polarization and conflict within Indian society. The analysis likely delves into specific instances and policies that exemplify this alleged strategy, examining its impact on different minority communities and the broader political landscape.
Expert Analysis
The Human Rights Watch report casts a spotlight on several critical concepts related to governance, human rights, and national security in India. The report highlights concerns regarding the treatment of religious minorities and the application of laws that impact fundamental freedoms.
The National Security Act (NSA), enacted in 1980, allows preventive detention for individuals deemed a threat to national security or public order. The detention can be extended up to 12 months without charge. In the context of the Human Rights Watch report, the NSA was invoked against Sonam Wangchuk, an educator and climate activist in Ladakh, following protests demanding autonomy in September 2025. This raises concerns about the potential misuse of the NSA to suppress dissent and peaceful activism.
The report also points to the issue of unlawful demolitions, particularly targeting Muslim homes and properties, often justified under the guise of illegal construction or occupation by “illegal immigrants.” These actions, according to the report, violate a Supreme Court ruling, although the specific ruling is not mentioned. Such demolitions raise serious questions about due process, the rule of law, and the protection of property rights, especially for vulnerable communities.
Another key concept is hate speech, often linked to Hindu nationalist groups, which the report claims has led to increased attacks against Muslims. While the report doesn't specify which laws are used to combat hate speech, India's legal framework includes provisions under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) that criminalize speech promoting enmity between different groups. The effectiveness of these laws and their enforcement remain a subject of debate, particularly in the context of rising religious polarization. For UPSC aspirants, understanding these concepts—the NSA, unlawful demolitions, and hate speech—is crucial for both Prelims and Mains, particularly in the context of fundamental rights, governance, and social justice (GS Paper II).
Visual Insights
Regions Affected by Alleged Unlawful Demolitions and Protests
Map showing states where unlawful demolitions and protests have been reported, along with key locations mentioned in the news.
Loading interactive map...
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
1. How might the BJP's alleged strategy of fostering division among minorities, as reported by Human Rights Watch, affect India's international standing?
Such reports can negatively impact India's reputation on global platforms, potentially affecting diplomatic relations, trade negotiations, and international collaborations. Concerns raised by human rights organizations can lead to increased scrutiny from international bodies and foreign governments.
2. What is the likely UPSC Prelims angle regarding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) mentioned in the context of suppressed dissent?
UPSC might ask about the UAPA's provisions, amendments, or recent Supreme Court rulings related to it. A likely distractor would be to confuse it with similar laws or misattribute its clauses. Remember key amendments and the grounds for invoking UAPA.
Exam Tip
Focus on landmark judgments related to UAPA and the specific conditions under which it can be invoked. Pay attention to the difference between UAPA and NSA (National Security Act).
3. How does the crackdown on government critics and media self-censorship, as alleged in the report, relate to fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution?
Such actions potentially violate the fundamental rights to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19) and the right to personal liberty (Article 21). The suppression of dissent and media censorship can undermine the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution.
4. What are the potential implications of labeling Bengali-speaking Muslims and Rohingya refugees as 'illegal immigrants'?
Labeling specific communities as 'illegal immigrants' can lead to their marginalization, discrimination, and denial of basic rights. It can also fuel xenophobia and create social divisions, making them vulnerable to exploitation and abuse.
5. In the context of the alleged divisive tactics, what is the government's official stance on the rights and treatment of minorities in India?
The government's official stance typically emphasizes its commitment to inclusive growth and development for all citizens, including minorities. It often highlights various schemes and initiatives aimed at empowering minority communities and ensuring their socio-economic well-being. However, the actual implementation and impact of these policies are often debated.
6. How does the alleged crackdown on dissent in India connect to broader global trends concerning freedom of expression and human rights?
The alleged crackdown aligns with a global trend of increasing restrictions on freedom of expression, particularly in countries experiencing political polarization or authoritarian tendencies. Many nations are witnessing similar patterns of suppressing dissent, targeting journalists, and using digital surveillance to monitor citizens.
7. If a Mains question asks to 'Critically examine' the role of the BJP in fostering division among minorities, what key arguments should be included?
A balanced answer should include arguments both supporting and contesting the claim. Arguments to consider: * Legislative and policy decisions perceived as discriminatory. * Instances of alleged hate speech by party members. * Government initiatives aimed at minority welfare. * Socio-economic data on minority development. * Independent reports from human rights organizations.
- •Legislative and policy decisions perceived as discriminatory.
- •Instances of alleged hate speech by party members.
- •Government initiatives aimed at minority welfare.
- •Socio-economic data on minority development.
- •Independent reports from human rights organizations.
8. What is the difference between 'hate speech' and 'free speech,' and how does the Indian Constitution address this?
Free speech, guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a), is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). Hate speech, which incites violence, discrimination, or hatred against a group, is not protected and can be penalized. The line is often blurry and subject to judicial interpretation.
9. Considering the report's claims, what specific facts related to Article 19 (freedom of speech) could UPSC test?
UPSC could test the reasonable restrictions on Article 19(1)(a) as defined in Article 19(2), such as 'public order', 'decency', 'morality', 'sovereignty and integrity of India'. They might present a scenario and ask which restriction applies. A common trap is misinterpreting the scope of these restrictions.
Exam Tip
Memorize the exact wording of Article 19(2) and understand the judicial interpretations of each restriction. Focus on recent Supreme Court cases related to freedom of speech and expression.
10. How might the alleged suppression of independent media and arrests for social media comments impact India's democracy?
Suppression of media and arrests for online speech can stifle public discourse, limit accountability, and erode trust in democratic institutions. It can lead to a chilling effect, where citizens self-censor to avoid government reprisal, undermining the principles of a free and open society.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the National Security Act (NSA) of 1980: 1. It allows preventive detention for individuals deemed a threat to national security or public order. 2. The detention period under NSA cannot exceed six months. 3. The NSA was invoked against Sonam Wangchuk in Ladakh following protests demanding autonomy. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: C
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The National Security Act (NSA) of 1980 indeed allows preventive detention for individuals deemed a threat to national security or public order. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: The detention period under the NSA can be extended up to 12 months without charge, not six months. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The NSA was invoked against Sonam Wangchuk, an educator and climate activist in Ladakh, following protests demanding autonomy in September 2025, as per the Human Rights Watch report.
Source Articles
Derek O’Brien writes: In its outreach to Bohra Muslims, BJP’s subtle divide-and-rule strategy | The Indian Express
Budget session of Gujarat Assembly: Congress stages walkout from Gujarat Assembly over ‘poor’ budgetary allocations for SC, OBC, minorities | Ahmedabad News - The Indian Express
Minority & the party | The Indian Express
Minority Status: News, Photos, Latest News Headlines about Minority Status - The Indian Express
‘Media exaggeration’: Bangladesh Border Chief dismisses minority attack reports in first talks post Hasina govt fall | India News - The Indian Express
About the Author
Anshul MannPublic Policy Enthusiast & UPSC Analyst
Anshul Mann writes about Polity & Governance at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.
View all articles →