For this article:

29 Dec 2025·Source: The Indian Express
2 min
Environment & EcologySocial IssuesPolity & GovernanceNEWS

Chhattisgarh Villagers Secure Win Against Mining After Violent Protests

Chhattisgarh villagers win against mining in Hasdeo Arand after protests, highlighting tribal rights and environmental concerns.

Chhattisgarh Villagers Secure Win Against Mining After Violent Protests

Photo by Avinash Misra

Following violent protests, villagers in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo Arand region have secured a significant win against coal mining. The state government, under new Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai, announced a review of the Parsa coal block allocation to the Adani Group, effectively halting further mining activities.

The protests, which had turned violent, centered on the violation of Gram Sabha resolutions and the destruction of ecologically sensitive forest areas crucial for tribal livelihoods. This development underscores the critical role of tribal rights, environmental protection, and the Panchayats Extension to Scheduled Areas (PESA) Act in resource governance.

मुख्य तथ्य

1.

Chhattisgarh government announced review of Parsa coal block allocation

2.

Decision followed violent anti-mining protests in Hasdeo Arand

3.

Protests concerned tribal rights and Gram Sabha resolutions

4.

Adani Group was allocated the Parsa coal block

UPSC परीक्षा के दृष्टिकोण

1.

Role and implementation of PESA Act, 1996

2.

Provisions and challenges of Forest Rights Act, 2006

3.

Environmental governance, EIA, and forest clearances for mining projects

4.

Tribal rights, self-governance, and resource management in Scheduled Areas (Fifth Schedule)

5.

Conflict between development and environmental/social justice

6.

Geography and ecology of Hasdeo Arand region

दृश्य सामग्री

Hasdeo Arand: A Flashpoint for Tribal Rights & Environment in Chhattisgarh

This map highlights the location of Hasdeo Arand forest in Chhattisgarh, a region critical for tribal livelihoods, biodiversity, and rich in coal reserves. It contextualizes the recent protests against mining and the role of PESA-mandated Gram Sabha resolutions.

Loading interactive map...

📍Chhattisgarh📍Hasdeo Arand

Timeline of Hasdeo Arand Conflict & PESA Assertion (2014-2025)

This timeline illustrates the key events leading to the recent halt of mining activities in Hasdeo Arand, highlighting the persistent struggle of tribal communities and the assertion of Gram Sabha powers under PESA.

The Hasdeo Arand conflict represents a decade-long struggle where tribal communities, empowered by PESA and FRA, have consistently resisted industrial exploitation of their ancestral lands and critical forest resources. This timeline shows the culmination of their sustained efforts and advocacy.

  • 2014Initial coal block allocations in Hasdeo Arand, sparking local protests and concerns over forest clearances.
  • 2018-2021Intensification of Gram Sabha resolutions against mining, citing violations of PESA Act and Forest Rights Act. Legal challenges initiated by tribal communities.
  • 2022Major 'padyatras' (foot marches) by villagers to Raipur and Delhi, drawing national attention to the Hasdeo Arand issue. Some forest clearances granted amidst protests.
  • 2023 (Early)Protests escalate, including instances of violent clashes between villagers and authorities/company personnel over land demarcation and tree felling.
  • 2023 (Late)State Assembly Elections in Chhattisgarh; change in government. New Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai takes office, promising review of contentious projects.
  • 2025 (Current News)Chhattisgarh government announces a review of the Parsa coal block allocation to Adani Group, effectively halting further mining activities in Hasdeo Arand, marking a significant win for villagers.
और जानकारी

पृष्ठभूमि

The Hasdeo Arand region in Chhattisgarh has been a focal point of conflict between industrial development (coal mining) and environmental conservation/tribal rights for over a decade. It's one of the largest contiguous dense forest areas in Central India, rich in biodiversity, and home to several tribal communities whose livelihoods depend on the forest.

The region is also a critical elephant corridor. Previous protests and legal battles have highlighted issues related to the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), Forest Rights Act (FRA), and environmental clearances.

नवीनतम घटनाक्रम

Following renewed violent protests, the Chhattisgarh state government, under the new Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai, announced a review of the Parsa coal block allocation to the Adani Group. This decision effectively halts further mining activities, marking a significant victory for the local villagers and environmental activists. The protests centered on alleged violations of Gram Sabha resolutions and the ecological destruction of the sensitive forest area.

बहुविकल्पीय प्रश्न (MCQ)

1. With reference to the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), consider the following statements: 1. It empowers the Gram Sabha to approve plans, programmes and projects for social and economic development before their implementation in Scheduled Areas. 2. The Gram Sabha's recommendation is mandatory for granting prospecting license or mining lease for both minor and major minerals in Scheduled Areas. 3. PESA applies to all Scheduled Areas specified under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Statement 1 is correct. PESA mandates that the Gram Sabha or the Panchayats at the appropriate level shall be consulted before making the acquisition of land in the Scheduled Areas for development projects and before resettling or rehabilitating persons affected by such projects. It also empowers them to approve plans, programmes and projects for social and economic development. Statement 2 is incorrect. Under PESA, the recommendation of the Gram Sabha is mandatory for granting prospecting license or mining lease for minor minerals. However, for major minerals, the Gram Sabha's recommendation is consultative, not mandatory. The news refers to a coal block, which is a major mineral. Statement 3 is correct. PESA extends the provisions of Part IX of the Constitution relating to Panchayats to the Scheduled Areas mentioned in the Fifth Schedule, with certain modifications and exceptions. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

2. In the context of the Hasdeo Arand region, which recently featured in news, consider the following statements: 1. It is located in the state of Chhattisgarh and is known for its rich biodiversity and dense forest cover. 2. The region is recognized as a critical elephant corridor and is part of the catchment area for the Mahanadi river. 3. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA) grants Community Forest Rights (CFR) to tribal communities over minor forest produce in this region, but not over major forest produce. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: A

Statement 1 is correct. Hasdeo Arand is indeed located in Chhattisgarh and is renowned for its ecological significance, including dense forests and rich biodiversity. Statement 2 is correct. The region is a vital elephant corridor connecting different forest patches and is part of the catchment area for the Hasdeo River, a tributary of the Mahanadi. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA) recognizes and vests forest rights and occupation in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers. Community Forest Rights (CFRs) under FRA include rights over all forest produce (minor and major), not just minor forest produce. The distinction between minor and major forest produce is more relevant in the context of PESA for Gram Sabha's ownership rights over minor forest produce.

3. With reference to the allocation of coal blocks and environmental governance in India, consider the following statements: 1. The 'No-Go' areas policy, which restricts mining in ecologically sensitive forest areas, is currently a legally binding framework for coal block allocation. 2. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports for mining projects are primarily prepared by government agencies to ensure impartiality. 3. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) is the sole authority for granting forest clearance for mining projects in forest areas under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: C

Statement 1 is incorrect. The 'No-Go' areas policy was proposed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (now MoEFCC) to identify and restrict mining in ecologically sensitive forest areas. However, it faced significant resistance from the Ministry of Coal and other stakeholders and was never formally implemented as a legally binding framework. It remains a guiding principle but not a strict legal barrier. Statement 2 is incorrect. EIA reports are typically prepared by private consultants or agencies hired by the project proponent (the company seeking clearance), not primarily by government agencies. This model often raises concerns about the impartiality and quality of EIA reports. Statement 3 is correct. Under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) is the nodal ministry responsible for granting forest clearance for any non-forest activity, including mining, in forest areas.

GKSolverआज की खबरें