Skip to main content
GKSolverGKSolver
HomeExam NewsMCQsMainsUPSC Prep
Login
Menu
Daily
HomeDaily NewsExam NewsStudy Plan
Practice
Essential MCQsEssential MainsUPSC PrepBookmarks
Browse
EditorialsStory ThreadsTrending
Home
Daily
MCQs
Saved
News

© 2025 GKSolver. Free AI-powered UPSC preparation platform.

AboutContactPrivacyTermsDisclaimer
GKSolverGKSolver
HomeExam NewsMCQsMainsUPSC Prep
Login
Menu
Daily
HomeDaily NewsExam NewsStudy Plan
Practice
Essential MCQsEssential MainsUPSC PrepBookmarks
Browse
EditorialsStory ThreadsTrending
Home
Daily
MCQs
Saved
News

© 2025 GKSolver. Free AI-powered UPSC preparation platform.

AboutContactPrivacyTermsDisclaimer
2 minAct/Law
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Concepts
  4. /
  5. Act/Law
  6. /
  7. Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
Act/Law

Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

What is Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968?

The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 provides the procedure for the removal of a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court by the Parliament of India. It outlines the process for investigating allegations of misbehavior or incapacity against a judge.

Historical Background

Enacted in 1968, the Act was a response to the need for a structured and transparent mechanism for addressing complaints against judges. It aims to balance judicial independence with accountability.

Evolution of Judicial Accountability in India

Key events and developments related to judicial accountability in India.

Judges (Inquiry) Act: Key Aspects

Mind map illustrating the key aspects and related concepts of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

2 minAct/Law
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Concepts
  4. /
  5. Act/Law
  6. /
  7. Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
Act/Law

Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

What is Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968?

The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 provides the procedure for the removal of a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court by the Parliament of India. It outlines the process for investigating allegations of misbehavior or incapacity against a judge.

Historical Background

Enacted in 1968, the Act was a response to the need for a structured and transparent mechanism for addressing complaints against judges. It aims to balance judicial independence with accountability.

Evolution of Judicial Accountability in India

Key events and developments related to judicial accountability in India.

Judges (Inquiry) Act: Key Aspects

Mind map illustrating the key aspects and related concepts of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

1950

Constitution of India adopted; Articles 124 & 217 lay the groundwork for judicial appointments and removal.

1968

Judges (Inquiry) Act enacted to provide a mechanism for investigating misconduct of judges.

1991

Ram Swamy case: First impeachment motion against a Supreme Court judge; failed to pass in Parliament.

2011

Impeachment motion against Justice Soumitra Sen of Calcutta High Court; he resigned before the impeachment could be completed.

2014

National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act passed, aiming to change the process of judicial appointments; later struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015.

2018

Impeachment motion against Chief Justice Dipak Misra; rejected by the Rajya Sabha Chairman.

2025

Allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad High Court lead to inquiry committee formation.

2026

Supreme Court upholds Speaker's inquiry panel move against Justice Varma.

Connected to current news
Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

Motion in Parliament

Inquiry Committee

Article 124(4)

Article 217

Safeguards for Judges

Accountability Mechanisms

Cumbersome Process

Lack of Success

Connections
Removal Process→Constitutional Basis
Removal Process→Judicial Independence
Criticisms & Challenges→Removal Process
1950

Constitution of India adopted; Articles 124 & 217 lay the groundwork for judicial appointments and removal.

1968

Judges (Inquiry) Act enacted to provide a mechanism for investigating misconduct of judges.

1991

Ram Swamy case: First impeachment motion against a Supreme Court judge; failed to pass in Parliament.

2011

Impeachment motion against Justice Soumitra Sen of Calcutta High Court; he resigned before the impeachment could be completed.

2014

National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act passed, aiming to change the process of judicial appointments; later struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015.

2018

Impeachment motion against Chief Justice Dipak Misra; rejected by the Rajya Sabha Chairman.

2025

Allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad High Court lead to inquiry committee formation.

2026

Supreme Court upholds Speaker's inquiry panel move against Justice Varma.

Connected to current news
Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

Motion in Parliament

Inquiry Committee

Article 124(4)

Article 217

Safeguards for Judges

Accountability Mechanisms

Cumbersome Process

Lack of Success

Connections
Removal Process→Constitutional Basis
Removal Process→Judicial Independence
Criticisms & Challenges→Removal Process

Key Points

9 points
  • 1.

    A motion for presenting an address to the President for the removal of a judge must be supported by at least 100 members of the Lok Sabha or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha.

  • 2.

    The Speaker/Chairman may admit the motion or refuse to admit it.

  • 3.

    If the motion is admitted, a 3-member committee is constituted to investigate the charges.

  • 4.

    The committee consists of: (a) a sitting or retired Judge of the Supreme Court, (b) a Chief Justice of a High Court, and (c) a distinguished jurist.

  • 5.

    If the committee finds the judge guilty of misbehavior or incapacity, the motion for removal is taken up in Parliament.

  • 6.

    The motion must be passed by a special majority in each House of Parliament (i.e., a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting).

  • 7.

    If the motion is passed by both Houses, the President issues an order removing the judge.

  • 8.

    The Act aims to ensure a fair and impartial inquiry while safeguarding judicial independence.

  • 9.

    The process is quasi-judicial in nature, involving evidence gathering and examination of witnesses.

Visual Insights

Evolution of Judicial Accountability in India

Key events and developments related to judicial accountability in India.

The need for judicial accountability has been debated since the inception of the Constitution. The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 was enacted to provide a framework for addressing allegations of misconduct against judges, balancing judicial independence with the need for accountability.

  • 1950Constitution of India adopted; Articles 124 & 217 lay the groundwork for judicial appointments and removal.
  • 1968Judges (Inquiry) Act enacted to provide a mechanism for investigating misconduct of judges.
  • 1991Ram Swamy case: First impeachment motion against a Supreme Court judge; failed to pass in Parliament.
  • 2011Impeachment motion against Justice Soumitra Sen of Calcutta High Court; he resigned before the impeachment could be completed.
  • 2014National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act passed, aiming to change the process of judicial appointments; later struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015.
  • 2018Impeachment motion against Chief Justice Dipak Misra; rejected by the Rajya Sabha Chairman.
  • 2025Allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad High Court lead to inquiry committee formation.
  • 2026Supreme Court upholds Speaker's inquiry panel move against Justice Varma.

Judges (Inquiry) Act: Key Aspects

Mind map illustrating the key aspects and related concepts of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

  • ●Removal Process
  • ●Constitutional Basis
  • ●Judicial Independence
  • ●Criticisms & Challenges

Related Concepts

Article 124Judicial Independence

Source Topic

SC Upholds Speaker's Inquiry Panel Move Against Justice Varma

Polity & Governance

UPSC Relevance

Important for UPSC GS Paper 2 (Polity and Governance). Questions can be asked about the procedure for removal of judges, the role of the Parliament, and the importance of judicial accountability. Frequently appears in Mains.

On This Page

DefinitionHistorical BackgroundKey PointsVisual InsightsRelated ConceptsUPSC RelevanceSource Topic

Source Topic

SC Upholds Speaker's Inquiry Panel Move Against Justice VarmaPolity & Governance

Related Concepts

Article 124Judicial Independence

Key Points

9 points
  • 1.

    A motion for presenting an address to the President for the removal of a judge must be supported by at least 100 members of the Lok Sabha or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha.

  • 2.

    The Speaker/Chairman may admit the motion or refuse to admit it.

  • 3.

    If the motion is admitted, a 3-member committee is constituted to investigate the charges.

  • 4.

    The committee consists of: (a) a sitting or retired Judge of the Supreme Court, (b) a Chief Justice of a High Court, and (c) a distinguished jurist.

  • 5.

    If the committee finds the judge guilty of misbehavior or incapacity, the motion for removal is taken up in Parliament.

  • 6.

    The motion must be passed by a special majority in each House of Parliament (i.e., a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting).

  • 7.

    If the motion is passed by both Houses, the President issues an order removing the judge.

  • 8.

    The Act aims to ensure a fair and impartial inquiry while safeguarding judicial independence.

  • 9.

    The process is quasi-judicial in nature, involving evidence gathering and examination of witnesses.

Visual Insights

Evolution of Judicial Accountability in India

Key events and developments related to judicial accountability in India.

The need for judicial accountability has been debated since the inception of the Constitution. The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 was enacted to provide a framework for addressing allegations of misconduct against judges, balancing judicial independence with the need for accountability.

  • 1950Constitution of India adopted; Articles 124 & 217 lay the groundwork for judicial appointments and removal.
  • 1968Judges (Inquiry) Act enacted to provide a mechanism for investigating misconduct of judges.
  • 1991Ram Swamy case: First impeachment motion against a Supreme Court judge; failed to pass in Parliament.
  • 2011Impeachment motion against Justice Soumitra Sen of Calcutta High Court; he resigned before the impeachment could be completed.
  • 2014National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act passed, aiming to change the process of judicial appointments; later struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015.
  • 2018Impeachment motion against Chief Justice Dipak Misra; rejected by the Rajya Sabha Chairman.
  • 2025Allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad High Court lead to inquiry committee formation.
  • 2026Supreme Court upholds Speaker's inquiry panel move against Justice Varma.

Judges (Inquiry) Act: Key Aspects

Mind map illustrating the key aspects and related concepts of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

  • ●Removal Process
  • ●Constitutional Basis
  • ●Judicial Independence
  • ●Criticisms & Challenges

Related Concepts

Article 124Judicial Independence

Source Topic

SC Upholds Speaker's Inquiry Panel Move Against Justice Varma

Polity & Governance

UPSC Relevance

Important for UPSC GS Paper 2 (Polity and Governance). Questions can be asked about the procedure for removal of judges, the role of the Parliament, and the importance of judicial accountability. Frequently appears in Mains.

On This Page

DefinitionHistorical BackgroundKey PointsVisual InsightsRelated ConceptsUPSC RelevanceSource Topic

Source Topic

SC Upholds Speaker's Inquiry Panel Move Against Justice VarmaPolity & Governance

Related Concepts

Article 124Judicial Independence