For this article:

23 Mar 2026·Source: The Hindu
4 min
AM
Anshul Mann
|South India
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesNEWS

States and partners must collaborate for grassroots sports development

Telangana, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar officials discuss the necessity of PPP models for sports development.

UPSCSSC

Quick Revision

1.

Administrators from Telangana, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar discussed the shift towards grassroots sports and infrastructure development.

2.

A Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model was endorsed for sports development.

3.

Telangana's government focuses on infrastructure and grassroots talent, while partners manage facilities and coaching.

4.

Tamil Nadu highlighted the success of the Chief Minister's Trophy, engaging thirteen lakh sportspersons.

5.

Bihar has a three-stage sports scholarship policy: Prerna (grassroots), Saksham (national), and Udaan (international).

6.

Under Bihar's Udaan scholarship, athletes receive up to ₹20 lakh per annum.

7.

Under Bihar's Saksham scholarship, athletes receive ₹5 lakh.

8.

Under Bihar's Prerna scholarship, athletes receive ₹3 lakh.

Key Numbers

Thirteen lakh sportspersons participated in Tamil Nadu's Chief Minister's Trophy.13,000 participants were from the school level in Tamil Nadu's CM Trophy.12,000 participants were from the college level in Tamil Nadu's CM Trophy.800 athletes are under Bihar's sports scholarship policy.₹20 lakh is the maximum annual scholarship for athletes under Bihar's Udaan policy.₹5 lakh is the annual scholarship for athletes under Bihar's Saksham policy.₹3 lakh is the annual scholarship for athletes under Bihar's Prerna policy.

Visual Insights

States Discussing Grassroots Sports Development

This map highlights the states (Telangana, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar) that participated in discussions regarding the shift towards grassroots sports development and the adoption of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models.

Loading interactive map...

📍Telangana📍Tamil Nadu📍Bihar

Mains & Interview Focus

Don't miss it!

The discourse around sports development in India, as captured in this report, underscores a critical juncture. For too long, our approach has been akin to building a magnificent skyscraper on a foundation of sand. The emphasis has often been on high-profile events and elite athlete support, neglecting the fundamental need for a robust grassroots ecosystem. This article rightly champions the shift towards grassroots development and infrastructure building, a strategy that is not merely desirable but essential for sustainable sporting success.

The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, as articulated by Jayesh Ranjan, presents a pragmatic way forward. Governments possess the mandate and resources for land acquisition and initial infrastructure, while private entities bring specialized management, coaching expertise, and operational efficiency. This division of labor, if implemented transparently and with clear accountability mechanisms, can prevent the over-bureaucratization that often plagues public sports administration. Telangana's tie-ups with FIFA and Juventus serve as tangible examples of this collaborative potential.

Tamil Nadu's Chief Minister's Trophy, engaging over thirteen lakh participants, demonstrates the power of structured, large-scale grassroots competitions. Such initiatives are vital not just for talent identification but also for fostering a widespread sporting culture, making sports accessible and aspirational for a larger segment of the population. Similarly, Bihar's tiered scholarship policy—Prerna, Saksham, and Udaan—offers a structured pathway from local talent to international aspiration, with increasing financial support at each stage. This tiered approach is a commendable effort to provide sustained support.

However, the success of these initiatives hinges on effective implementation and equitable distribution of resources. We must guard against the tendency for funds and opportunities to be concentrated in urban centers or specific disciplines. Furthermore, the integration of sports with education, as suggested by Abhinav Bindra, needs deeper exploration. A holistic approach that views sports not just as a competitive pursuit but as a crucial component of physical and mental development from childhood is paramount. Norway's model, where early childhood sports are inclusive and development-focused rather than selection-driven, offers valuable lessons.

Ultimately, the aspiration to host major events like the Olympics must be underpinned by a strong domestic sports structure. The article's focus on collaboration between state governments and partners is a positive signal. Moving forward, a consistent, long-term vision that prioritizes grassroots development, coupled with effective PPP frameworks and a commitment to holistic athlete development, will be key to unlocking India's true sporting potential and ensuring that the legacy of any major event is a thriving national sports ecosystem.

Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper I: Society - Social issues, urbanization and their effects, diversity of India.

2.

GS Paper II: Governance - Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Role of non-State and private actors in governance.

3.

GS Paper III: Economy - Infrastructure: energy, ports, roads, airports and railways, etc. (Sports infrastructure as a part of it).

4.

Current Events: National and international importance of sports, government schemes for sports development.

View Detailed Summary

Summary

Sports officials from different Indian states are talking about how to get more people involved in sports from a young age. They believe that by working together, governments and private companies can build better sports facilities and find new talent. This approach aims to create a stronger foundation for sports across the country, not just for a few top athletes.

Jayesh Ranjan, Principal Secretary of Industries and Commerce in Telangana, highlighted the crucial role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in grassroots sports development, stating that governments should focus on building infrastructure and identifying talent, while private partners manage facilities and coaching. This perspective was shared during discussions involving administrators from Telangana, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar on shifting focus towards grassroots sports and infrastructure. J. Meghanatha Reddy from Tamil Nadu pointed to the success of the Chief Minister's Trophy as a testament to effective sports promotion. In Bihar, Raveendran Sankaran detailed the state's three-stage sports scholarship policy: 'Prerna' for beginners, 'Saksham' for intermediate athletes, and 'Udaan' for advanced sportspersons, each offering varying levels of financial support to nurture talent from the ground up. These discussions underscore a collaborative approach, integrating government support with private sector efficiency to strengthen India's sports ecosystem from its foundation.

This focus on grassroots development and PPP models is vital for India's sporting future, aiming to create a robust pipeline of talent and improve sports infrastructure nationwide. It is relevant for the Polity and Governance aspects of the UPSC Civil Services Exam.

Background

भारत में खेल विकास को ऐतिहासिक रूप से सरकारी निकायों द्वारा नियंत्रित किया गया है, जिनमें भारतीय खेल प्राधिकरण (SAI) जैसे संगठन प्रमुख रहे हैं। हालांकि, जमीनी स्तर पर प्रतिभा की पहचान और पोषण में अक्सर चुनौतियां रही हैं। हाल के वर्षों में, सरकार ने सार्वजनिक-निजी भागीदारी (PPP) मॉडल को बढ़ावा देने पर जोर दिया है, ताकि खेल के बुनियादी ढांचे के विकास और खेल के प्रचार में निजी क्षेत्र की विशेषज्ञता और संसाधनों का लाभ उठाया जा सके। यह खेल को केवल एक मनोरंजन के बजाय एक उद्योग के रूप में देखने की दिशा में एक बदलाव का संकेत देता है। खेलों में भारत की सफलता, विशेष रूप से ओलंपिक और राष्ट्रमंडल खेलों जैसे बड़े मंचों पर, अक्सर व्यक्तिगत प्रतिभाओं पर निर्भर रही है, जिनके पास सीमित जमीनी समर्थन होता है। इस कमी को दूर करने के लिए, सरकारें अब खेल को स्कूली शिक्षा और सामुदायिक कार्यक्रमों में एकीकृत करने के तरीकों की तलाश कर रही हैं। राष्ट्रीय खेल विकास संहिता जैसे प्रयास खेल प्रशासन में अधिक पारदर्शिता और जवाबदेही लाने के उद्देश्य से किए गए हैं।

Latest Developments

हाल के वर्षों में, भारत सरकार ने खेल को बढ़ावा देने के लिए कई पहलों की शुरुआत की है, जैसे कि खेलो इंडिया कार्यक्रम, जिसका उद्देश्य जमीनी स्तर पर खेल संस्कृति को पुनर्जीवित करना और विभिन्न आयु समूहों के बीच खेल प्रतिभाओं को विकसित करना है। इस कार्यक्रम के तहत, खेल के बुनियादी ढांचे के विकास और विभिन्न खेलों में प्रशिक्षण सुविधाओं को बढ़ाने पर जोर दिया गया है। इसके अतिरिक्त, राज्यों ने भी अपनी अनूठी खेल नीतियों और छात्रवृत्ति योजनाओं को लागू करना शुरू कर दिया है। तमिलनाडु की मुख्यमंत्री ट्रॉफी और बिहार की 'प्रेरणा', 'सक्षम', और 'उड़ान' जैसी छात्रवृत्ति योजनाएं जमीनी स्तर पर एथलीटों को प्रोत्साहित करने और उनका समर्थन करने के सरकारी प्रयासों का उदाहरण हैं। सार्वजनिक-निजी भागीदारी को प्रोत्साहित करने पर भी जोर दिया जा रहा है, ताकि खेल के क्षेत्र में निवेश और विशेषज्ञता को बढ़ाया जा सके।

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the sports development initiatives discussed by administrators from Telangana, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar: 1. Telangana's approach emphasizes government's role in infrastructure and talent identification, with private partners managing facilities and coaching. 2. Tamil Nadu highlighted the success of the 'Chief Minister's Trophy' in promoting sports. 3. Bihar's sports scholarship policy includes stages named 'Prerna', 'Saksham', and 'Udaan' for financial support. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.1 and 2 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: D

Statement 1 is CORRECT. Jayesh Ranjan from Telangana highlighted that governments should focus on infrastructure and grassroots talent, while partners manage facilities and coaching. Statement 2 is CORRECT. J. Meghanatha Reddy from Tamil Nadu noted the success of the Chief Minister's Trophy. Statement 3 is CORRECT. Raveendran Sankaran detailed Bihar's three-stage scholarship policy: Prerna, Saksham, and Udaan, with varying financial support. All three statements accurately reflect the information provided in the summary regarding the discussions.

2. Which of the following is a key characteristic of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model in grassroots sports development as discussed by administrators?

  • A.Private entities solely fund and manage all sports infrastructure.
  • B.Government focuses on infrastructure and talent identification, while partners handle operations and coaching.
  • C.PPP model is limited to organizing national-level tournaments only.
  • D.Public sector is entirely withdrawn, allowing complete private control over sports.
Show Answer

Answer: B

The summary explicitly states that Jayesh Ranjan highlighted the government's role in infrastructure and grassroots talent, while partners manage facilities and coaching. This division of roles is the core of the discussed PPP model. Option A is incorrect as it suggests sole private funding and management, which is not the case. Option C is incorrect as the focus is on grassroots development, not just national tournaments. Option D is incorrect as it implies complete withdrawal of the public sector, whereas the model suggests collaboration.

3. Consider the following statements regarding sports scholarship policies in India: 1. The 'Khel Ratna' award is a scholarship provided to young athletes at the grassroots level. 2. Bihar's 'Udaan' scholarship is aimed at beginners in sports. 3. Many states are now focusing on multi-stage scholarship programs to support athletes throughout their careers. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.2 only
  • C.3 only
  • D.1 and 3 only
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement 1 is INCORRECT. The 'Khel Ratna' award (now Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna Award) is the highest sporting honour in India, not a scholarship for grassroots athletes. Statement 2 is INCORRECT. Bihar's 'Udaan' scholarship is for advanced sportspersons, while 'Prerna' is for beginners. Statement 3 is CORRECT. The discussion on Bihar's multi-stage policy ('Prerna', 'Saksham', 'Udaan') and the general trend in sports development indicate a focus on supporting athletes throughout their careers, which is a broader trend beyond just Bihar.

Source Articles

AM

About the Author

Anshul Mann

Public Policy Enthusiast & UPSC Analyst

Anshul Mann writes about Polity & Governance at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →