For this article:

18 Mar 2026·Source: The Indian Express
4 min
EconomyPolity & GovernanceNEWS

Parliamentary Panel Urges 90-Day Crude Oil Stock for Energy Security

UPSC-PrelimsUPSC-MainsSSC

Quick Revision

1.

A parliamentary standing committee urged the Petroleum Ministry to achieve a 90-day crude oil stock.

2.

The goal is to safeguard India against potential supply shocks and external uncertainties.

3.

The committee recommended exploring the construction of more strategic reserve caverns nationwide.

4.

These recommendations are part of the seventh report on demands for grants presented in the Lok Sabha.

5.

The committee noted significant gaps between Budget Estimate (BE), Revised Estimate (RE), and Actual Expenditure (AE) in maintaining existing strategic petroleum reserves.

6.

Actual expenditure was 75%, 45%, and 47% of BE in 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26, respectively.

7.

Reasons for reduced expenditure include non-deployment of planned security personnel, lower electricity and manpower costs, delays in staff deputation, lower crude oil operational activities, and delays in finalising warehousing agreements (e.g., with Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited).

8.

The 31-member committee is led by Raigad MP Sunil Dattatray Tatkare (NCP).

Key Dates

2023-242024-252025-26Tuesday (when the report was presented in Lok Sabha)

Key Numbers

@@90-day@@ (crude oil stock target)@@75%@@ (actual expenditure of BE in 2023-24)@@45%@@ (actual expenditure of BE in 2024-25)@@47%@@ (actual expenditure of BE in 2025-26)@@31-member@@ (committee size)@@21@@ (Lok Sabha MPs in committee)@@10@@ (Rajya Sabha MPs in committee)

Visual Insights

Mains & Interview Focus

Don't miss it!

The parliamentary standing committee's recommendation for India to achieve a 90-day crude oil stock is a critical policy imperative, aligning the nation with global best practices for energy security. India's substantial reliance on crude oil imports, with a significant portion traversing volatile geopolitical regions, necessitates robust strategic reserves. The current capacity, while growing, remains insufficient to cushion against prolonged supply disruptions effectively.

The committee's observation of significant expenditure gaps—with actual spending at 75%, 45%, and 47% of budget estimates in recent financial years—is deeply concerning. This fiscal misalignment directly undermines the efficacy of the Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) program. Reasons cited, such as non-deployment of security personnel and delays in warehousing agreements with entities like Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited, point to systemic inefficiencies in project execution and inter-agency coordination.

Building more strategic reserve caverns, as suggested, is a sound long-term strategy. However, the immediate challenge lies in optimizing the utilization and maintenance of existing facilities. The Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL) must be empowered with greater autonomy and accountability to streamline procurement, deployment, and operational activities. Furthermore, a transparent mechanism for tracking budgetary allocations versus actual expenditure is essential to prevent future shortfalls.

Other major economies, including the United States and Japan, maintain substantial strategic reserves, often exceeding 90 days of net imports, recognizing their critical role in national resilience. India's aspiration to become a major global economic power demands a commensurate level of energy preparedness. This is not merely an economic issue; it is a fundamental component of national security and geopolitical leverage.

To move forward, the Petroleum Ministry must establish clear, time-bound targets for SPR expansion and operational efficiency. This includes fast-tracking land acquisition for new caverns, ensuring timely deployment of personnel, and finalizing all necessary logistical agreements. Prioritizing investment in this critical infrastructure will yield substantial dividends in terms of economic stability and strategic autonomy.

Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper III: Economy - Energy Security, Infrastructure, Investment Models, Critical Minerals

2.

GS Paper II: Governance - Government Policies and Interventions, Role of Parliamentary Committees, Fiscal Federalism

3.

GS Paper III: Environment - Biofuels, Renewable Energy, Climate Change Mitigation

View Detailed Summary

Summary

A parliamentary committee wants India to store enough crude oil for 90 days to protect the country from future oil supply problems. This means building more underground storage facilities and fixing issues that are currently slowing down the maintenance of existing oil reserves, acting like a national emergency fuel tank.

On March 18, 2026, the Standing Committee on Petroleum and Natural Gas presented its seventh report on demands for grants in the Lok Sabha, urging the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas to achieve the global standard of maintaining a 90-day crude oil stock. This recommendation aims to safeguard India against potential supply shocks and external uncertainties, thereby strengthening the country's energy security. The 31-member committee, led by Raigad MP Sunil Dattatray Tatkare (NCP), also called for exploring the construction of more strategic reserve caverns across the nation.

Background

India, being the world's third-largest energy consumer, heavily relies on crude oil imports to meet its energy demands, making it vulnerable to global oil price volatility and supply disruptions. To mitigate these risks, the concept of Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPRs) was introduced, involving the storage of crude oil in underground caverns. These reserves serve as a crucial buffer during emergencies, ensuring the nation's energy security. The functioning of various government schemes and infrastructure projects is integral to India's energy landscape. The Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) aims to provide clean cooking fuel (LPG) to rural and deprived households, promoting health and environmental benefits. Similarly, the Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited project focuses on developing a gas pipeline network in the North-Eastern region to enhance natural gas availability and promote industrial growth. Furthermore, initiatives like the Pradhan Mantri JI-VAN Yojana support the development of advanced biofuels and 2G ethanol technologies, aligning with India's commitment to reducing its carbon footprint and diversifying its energy sources. The expansion of the City Gas Distribution (CGD) network is vital for increasing access to Piped Natural Gas (PNG) for domestic, commercial, and industrial consumers, contributing to a cleaner and more efficient energy supply.

Latest Developments

In recent years, global geopolitical events and supply chain disruptions have underscored the persistent volatility in international crude oil markets, prompting nations like India to re-evaluate their energy security strategies. India has been actively pursuing a multi-pronged approach, including increasing domestic oil and gas exploration, diversifying import sources, and investing in renewable energy and alternative fuels to reduce its reliance on fossil fuel imports. The government's focus on critical minerals has intensified, recognizing their indispensable role in emerging technologies like electric vehicles and renewable energy systems. Efforts are underway to secure international supply chains and boost domestic capabilities in exploration and processing of these minerals. Simultaneously, there is a strong emphasis on fiscal prudence, with parliamentary panels recommending measures like a 'Structural Reform Bridge' for states and a 'Sinking Fund' to manage long-term bond redemptions, aiming to strengthen the nation's internal economic fabric. Looking ahead, India aims to significantly expand its natural gas infrastructure, with a target of 12 crore Piped Natural Gas (PNG) connections by 2034, demonstrating a clear trajectory towards a gas-based economy. The ongoing push for advanced biofuels and the operationalization of social security frameworks for the informal workforce also reflect a broader commitment to sustainable and inclusive development, addressing both energy and social challenges.

Sources & Further Reading

Frequently Asked Questions

1. The parliamentary panel recommended a '90-day' crude oil stock. What is the global standard this recommendation refers to, and what specific detail might UPSC try to confuse aspirants with regarding SPRs?

The '90-day crude oil stock' recommendation refers to the global standard set by the International Energy Agency (IEA) for its member countries. While India is not a full IEA member, this standard is often cited as a benchmark for energy security. UPSC might try to confuse aspirants by asking about the *current* operational capacity or actual stock levels versus the *recommended* 90-day target, or by misattributing the standard to a different international body.

Exam Tip

Remember that the 90-day stock is a *target* or *recommendation* based on a global standard, not India's current achievement. Also, distinguish between the *capacity* of existing SPRs and the *actual stock* maintained. UPSC loves to test this difference.

2. The panel urged a 90-day crude oil stock. Given India's long-standing energy import reliance, why is this recommendation being highlighted now, and what specific issues did the committee find with existing reserve management?

This recommendation is being highlighted now due to persistent volatility in international crude oil markets, exacerbated by recent global geopolitical events and supply chain disruptions. These factors underscore India's vulnerability as the world's third-largest energy consumer, heavily reliant on imports. The committee found significant gaps in existing reserve management, specifically noting discrepancies between Budget Estimate (BE), Revised Estimate (RE), and Actual Expenditure (AE) for maintaining strategic petroleum reserves in recent years (e.g., 75% AE of BE in 2023-24, 45% in 2024-25, 47% in 2025-26).

3. Beyond increasing crude oil stock, how does this recommendation fit into India's overall multi-pronged energy security strategy, and what are the practical challenges in achieving the 90-day target and building more caverns?

This recommendation complements India's multi-pronged energy security strategy by strengthening the 'buffer' component against supply shocks. India's broader strategy includes increasing domestic oil and gas exploration, diversifying import sources, and investing in renewable energy and alternative fuels. Practical challenges in achieving the 90-day target and building more caverns include: acquiring suitable land, significant capital investment, geological surveys for underground caverns, environmental clearances, and the logistical complexities of filling and maintaining such large reserves. The committee's observation of expenditure gaps also points to potential budgetary and implementation hurdles.

4. The recommendation came from a 'Standing Committee on Petroleum and Natural Gas' during its report on 'demands for grants'. What is the role of such a committee, and what does 'demands for grants' signify in the parliamentary process for UPSC Prelims?

A Parliamentary Standing Committee, like the one on Petroleum and Natural Gas, is a permanent and regular committee that examines bills, policies, and the functioning of ministries. Its role is to provide detailed scrutiny of specific subjects, often involving public input, and to present reports to Parliament. 'Demands for Grants' are proposals from various ministries seeking funds from the Consolidated Fund of India for their expenditure in the upcoming financial year. The committee's report on these demands allows for parliamentary oversight and recommendations on how funds should be allocated and utilized, highlighting areas like the strategic petroleum reserves.

Exam Tip

For Prelims, remember that Standing Committees are permanent, unlike Ad Hoc Committees. 'Demands for Grants' are presented to the Lok Sabha and are part of the budget process, requiring parliamentary approval for government spending. Don't confuse them with 'Supplementary Grants' or 'Votes on Account'.

5. India is pursuing a multi-pronged approach for energy security. How do Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPRs) specifically differ in their role and immediate impact compared to other measures like diversifying import sources or investing in renewable energy?

Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPRs) primarily serve as an immediate, physical buffer against sudden supply shocks or geopolitical disruptions, ensuring short-term energy availability during emergencies. Their role is reactive and crisis-oriented. In contrast, diversifying import sources aims to reduce long-term reliance on any single supplier, enhancing resilience over time. Investing in renewable energy and alternative fuels is a proactive, long-term strategy to fundamentally reduce fossil fuel dependence and mitigate climate change, offering a more sustainable energy future rather than just managing supply disruptions of existing fuels. SPRs provide quick relief, while diversification and renewables offer structural changes.

6. A parliamentary panel has made this recommendation. What are the immediate next steps or implications for the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, and what future developments should aspirants track regarding India's energy security?

Following the parliamentary panel's recommendation, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas will likely review the report and formulate an action plan. This could involve increasing budgetary allocations for SPR maintenance and expansion, initiating feasibility studies for new cavern sites, and potentially setting timelines for achieving the 90-day stock target. Aspirants should track: actual steps taken by the Ministry, progress on new SPR projects, any policy changes related to crude oil procurement for reserves, and India's engagement in international energy forums. Also, watch for updates on India's overall energy mix, including progress in renewable energy and domestic oil exploration, as these are interconnected aspects of energy security.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the recent recommendations of the Standing Committee on Petroleum and Natural Gas: 1. The committee urged the Ministry to maintain a 90-day crude oil stock, aligning with global standards. 2. It noted that actual expenditure for Strategic Petroleum Reserve facilities consistently exceeded Budget Estimates in the last three financial years. 3. The committee recommended exploring the construction of more strategic reserve caverns across the country. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The Standing Committee on Petroleum and Natural Gas urged the Ministry to "make every possible effort" to achieve the global standard of maintaining 90-day crude oil stock to safeguard the country against potential supply shocks and external uncertainties. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: The committee noted a gap where actual expenditure (AE) stood at 75%, 45%, and 47% of the Budget Estimate (BE) allocated in 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26, respectively. This indicates actual expenditure was consistently *lower* than the Budget Estimates, not exceeding them. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The committee also asked the ministry to explore the possibility of constructing more strategic reserve caverns across the country to enhance energy security. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

2. With reference to the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Finance, consider the following statements: 1. It recommended that the Department of Economic Affairs develop a strategic energy mitigation framework to combat oil shocks. 2. The panel emphasized securing diversified international supply chains for critical minerals like lithium and cobalt. 3. It suggested linking 'Special Assistance for Capital Investment' to states' successful rationalisation of revenue expenditure to discourage fiscal populism. Which of the statements given above are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: D

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The Standing Committee on Finance suggested that the Department of Economic Affairs should develop a strategic energy mitigation framework to protect the economy from oil shocks and ensure long-term stability. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The committee emphasized the rapidly evolving global competition for critical minerals and rare earth elements and recommended accelerating efforts to secure diversified international supply chains for critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The committee recommended facilitating a 'Structural Reform Bridge' to help states transition away from revenue deficit grants (RDGs), which must include a rigorous mechanism to discourage fiscal populism by linking 'Special Assistance for Capital Investment' to the successful rationalisation of revenue expenditure. All three statements are correct as per the source.

3. In the context of India's energy security and social welfare, consider the following statements: 1. The Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) aims to provide free LPG connections to rural households, with a focus on increasing refill rates in underserved regions. 2. The Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited project is primarily focused on expanding the City Gas Distribution (CGD) network in the North-Eastern states. 3. The Pradhan Mantri JI-VAN Yojana promotes collaboration for advanced biofuels, specifically 2G ethanol technologies. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The committee recommended exploring targeted LPG subsidies for regions with the lowest refill rates under PMUY, using granular data from 10.43 crore PMUY consumers to identify households unable to use LPG regularly and design specific interventions for clean cooking. PMUY's core aim is to provide clean cooking fuel (LPG) connections. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: The Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited project is focused on developing a gas pipeline network in the North-Eastern region to achieve the Hydrocarbon Vision 2030 for the North-East. While it contributes to gas distribution, its primary focus is on the regional gas grid, not solely on CGD network expansion. CGD network expansion is a separate recommendation for PNG connections. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The Pradhan Mantri JI-VAN Yojana, as per the report, suggests promoting collaboration with research institutions and industry stakeholders to support technology validation and troubleshooting for advanced biofuels and 2G ethanol technologies. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

Source Articles

RS

About the Author

Richa Singh

Public Policy Enthusiast & UPSC Analyst

Richa Singh writes about Economy at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →