For this article:

9 Mar 2026·Source: The Hindu
6 min
RS
Ritu Singh
|International
Polity & GovernanceInternational RelationsNEWS

US Military Leverages Pop Culture Memes in Psychological Operations Against Iran

The US military is employing SpongeBob, Iron Man, and Call of Duty memes in a covert online influence campaign targeting Iran.

UPSC-PrelimsUPSC-MainsSSC

Quick Revision

1.

The US military uses a 'Call of Duty' account on X (formerly Twitter) for psychological operations.

2.

The operations target Iran using popular culture memes like SpongeBob and Iron Man.

3.

The tactic aims to influence foreign audiences by creating culturally resonant content.

4.

Content is often disseminated without direct attribution to the US government.

5.

The entire operation is managed by CENTCOM (United States Central Command).

6.

This strategy highlights the evolving nature of information warfare and strategic communication.

7.

The US military has a long history of psychological operations and using social media for influence.

8.

Iran frequently uses social media to spread disinformation.

Key Dates

2026-03-09 (Date of newspaper publication, providing context for the news)

Visual Insights

US Military's Psychological Operations Targeting Iran

This map illustrates the geographical context of the US military's psychological operations (PsyOps) targeting Iran. While these operations are primarily digital, the strategic command (CENTCOM) is based in the US, directing influence efforts towards the target nation, Iran, located in the Middle East.

Loading interactive map...

📍CENTCOM HQ (USA)📍Iran

Mains & Interview Focus

Don't miss it!

The US military's pivot to leveraging pop culture memes in its psychological operations against Iran marks a significant evolution in information warfare. This tactic, managed by CENTCOM through platforms like X, underscores a strategic shift from overt propaganda to culturally resonant, often unattributed, digital influence. Such methods aim to shape foreign audiences' perceptions and behaviors, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of contemporary media consumption.

However, this approach carries substantial risks. While memes can bypass traditional media filters and resonate deeply, the lack of clear attribution blurs the lines of state communication and can erode trust if exposed. Maintaining credibility becomes challenging when an official military entity operates under the guise of a 'Call of Duty' account, potentially undermining broader diplomatic efforts.

The ethical and legal ambiguities surrounding these operations are profound. Is it legitimate strategic communication or covert manipulation? International law, particularly the laws of armed conflict, offers limited guidance on such digital influence campaigns in peacetime. This creates a grey zone where states can engage in activities that, while not kinetic, can destabilize regions and foster mistrust.

India must closely observe these developments. Nations like China and Russia have long employed sophisticated digital influence tactics, often targeting democratic processes. New Delhi needs to develop a robust counter-strategy, not merely defensive, but also proactive in shaping its own strategic narratives through culturally appropriate and transparent channels. This requires significant investment in digital literacy and resilient information infrastructure.

Ultimately, the proliferation of meme warfare necessitates a global dialogue on norms for state conduct in the digital information space. Without clear international consensus, such tactics will continue to escalate, making it increasingly difficult to discern truth from manipulation and fostering an environment of perpetual digital conflict. India's foreign policy must advocate for responsible state behavior in this evolving domain.

Exam Angles

1.

GS-II: अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध - राज्य और गैर-राज्य अभिकर्ताओं द्वारा सूचना युद्ध और प्रभाव अभियानों का प्रभाव।

2.

GS-III: आंतरिक सुरक्षा - साइबर सुरक्षा चुनौतियाँ, दुष्प्रचार और सामाजिक ध्रुवीकरण का मुकाबला करना।

3.

GS-III: विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी - न्यूरोटेक्नोलॉजी के नैतिक निहितार्थ और डेटा गोपनीयता।

4.

GS-IV: नैतिकता - मीडिया नैतिकता, सरकारी प्रभाव अभियानों में पारदर्शिता और जवाबदेही।

View Detailed Summary

Summary

The US military is using popular internet memes and video game references on social media, like X, to subtly influence people in countries such as Iran. They create content that resonates with local culture, often without directly saying it's from the US government, as a new way to communicate and try to shape opinions.

The US military's "Call of Duty" account on X (formerly Twitter) is actively engaged in psychological operations targeting Iran, utilizing popular culture memes such as SpongeBob and Iron Man. This specific operation, managed by CENTCOM, aims to influence foreign audiences by creating culturally resonant content, often without direct attribution to the US government, highlighting the evolving nature of information warfare and the strategic use of digital platforms.

This tactic aligns with the increasing recognition of cognition as a central domain of modern warfare, where the objective is to influence perception, belief formation, and decision-making within target populations, moving beyond exclusive focus on physical destruction. NATO analysis describes this as cognitive warfare, an effort to target how individuals interpret reality and respond to information environments. Psychological operations are a foundational tool in this battlespace, involving messaging designed to influence emotions, motives, and reasoning to advance strategic objectives, a concept recognized early by the CIA's Simple Sabotage Field Manual.

The use of pop culture memes by the US military exemplifies "memetic warfare," a concept rooted in Richard Dawkins’ idea of replicating cultural units, now a serious subject of study in information warfare. NATO analysts describe memetic warfare as competition over narrative and social control in a social-media battlefield, noting memes' efficiency due to their emotional, compressed, and frictionless nature, allowing them to travel faster than fact-checkers and linger longer than official statements. This phenomenon is observed in conflicts like the US-Israel-Iran escalation and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, where memes serve as psychological relief, political satire, or coordinated narrative shaping.

Historically, U.S. influence operations have relied on credible intermediaries, as seen in the mid-1970s congressional investigations into "Operation Mockingbird," which revealed the CIA's covert relationships with approximately 50 American journalists until February 1976, as confirmed by a CIA document. Modern intelligence investigations have documented Russia’s Internet Research Agency operating covert social media personas to shape political discourse during the 2016 U.S. election, while China's “Three Warfares” doctrine integrates psychological, public opinion, and legal warfare to shape perception without kinetic conflict. Recent examples include Meta dismantling coordinated inauthentic behavior tied to the Israeli political marketing firm STOIC in 2024, and OpenAI disrupting similar influence operations, which involved fake accounts, geofenced audience targeting, and compensated influencer messaging. The Cambridge Analytica scandal further demonstrated how psychographic data and behavioral profiling enable microtargeted messaging to influence voter attitudes and behavior.

This convergence of psyops, disinformation, influencer ecosystems, psychographic targeting, and emerging neurotechnology signifies a structural shift in conflict toward perception-centric competition. For India, protecting informational integrity, cognitive liberty, and democratic resilience emerges as a defining national security challenge in an era where strategic battles increasingly occur within perception itself, making this topic highly relevant for UPSC Mains GS Paper 2 (International Relations, Government Policies) and GS Paper 3 (Internal Security, Cyber Security).

Background

मनोवैज्ञानिक अभियानों (PsyOps) का इतिहास शीत युद्ध के दौरान गहरा है, जब राष्ट्रों ने प्रतिद्वंद्वी समाजों के भीतर धारणाओं और विश्वासों को आकार देने के लिए सूचना को एक रणनीतिक उपकरण के रूप में इस्तेमाल किया। सीआईए का सिंपल सबोटेज फील्ड मैनुअल जैसे दस्तावेज़ों ने शुरुआती दौर में ही व्यवहारिक हेरफेर और आंतरिक व्यवधान के माध्यम से संगठनों को कमजोर करने की संज्ञानात्मक रणनीति को मान्यता दी थी। सोवियत संघ ने भी वैचारिक समूहों का समर्थन करके प्रतिद्वंद्वी समाजों में आंतरिक विभाजन को बढ़ाने की रणनीति अपनाई थी, जो ध्रुवीकरण को मजबूत करने पर केंद्रित थी। संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका में, 1970 के दशक के मध्य में कांग्रेस की जांचों ने ऑपरेशन मॉकिंगबर्ड नामक सीआईए के मीडिया संगठनों और पत्रकारों के साथ गुप्त संबंधों को उजागर किया। फरवरी 1976 तक, सीआईए के लगभग 50 अमेरिकी पत्रकारों के साथ संबंध थे, जिससे स्वतंत्र रिपोर्टिंग की विश्वसनीयता पर सवाल उठे। इन ऐतिहासिक मिसालों ने स्थापित किया कि खुफिया सेवाएं विश्वसनीय संचारकों और सम्मानित संस्थानों को रणनीतिक संपत्ति के रूप में देखती थीं जो सार्वजनिक विमर्श में जानकारी को न्यूनतम घर्षण के साथ प्रसारित कर सकते थे। मेमेटिक युद्ध की अवधारणा रिचर्ड डॉकिन्स के मीम्स को दोहराने वाली सांस्कृतिक इकाइयों के मूल विचार में निहित है। यह अवधारणा सूचना युद्ध के भीतर अध्ययन का एक गंभीर विषय बन गई है, जिसमें नाटो विश्लेषकों ने इसे सोशल-मीडिया युद्धक्षेत्र में कथा और सामाजिक नियंत्रण पर प्रतिस्पर्धा के रूप में वर्णित किया है।

Latest Developments

आधुनिक डिजिटल युग में, संज्ञानात्मक युद्ध ने नए आयाम ले लिए हैं, जिसमें दुष्प्रचार अभियान पहचान-आधारित विभाजनों और भावनात्मक रूप से चार्ज की गई कथाओं का फायदा उठाते हैं। 2016 के अमेरिकी चुनाव के दौरान रूस की इंटरनेट रिसर्च एजेंसी द्वारा नकली सोशल मीडिया खातों का उपयोग राजनीतिक विमर्श को आकार देने के लिए किया गया था, जो विश्वास क्षरण और विभाजन की रणनीति को दर्शाता है। चीन की थ्री वॉरफेयर डॉक्ट्रिन मनोवैज्ञानिक युद्ध, जनमत युद्ध और कानूनी युद्ध को एकीकृत करती है ताकि गतिज संघर्ष के बिना धारणा को आकार दिया जा सके। हाल के घटनाक्रमों में, 2024 में मेटा ने इजरायली राजनीतिक मार्केटिंग फर्म STOIC से जुड़े समन्वित अप्रामाणिक व्यवहार को निष्क्रिय कर दिया, जिसमें राजनीतिक कथाओं को बढ़ावा देने के लिए नकली खातों का उपयोग किया गया था। OpenAI ने भी इसी फर्म से जुड़े प्रभाव अभियानों को बाधित किया। कैम्ब्रिज एनालिटिका घोटाला ने प्रदर्शित किया कि कैसे साइकोग्राफिक डेटा और व्यवहारिक प्रोफाइलिंग का उपयोग मतदाता के दृष्टिकोण और व्यवहार को प्रभावित करने के लिए लक्षित संदेशों को वितरित करने के लिए किया जा सकता है। भविष्य में, उभरती न्यूरोटेक्नोलॉजी मानसिक गोपनीयता और संज्ञानात्मक स्वायत्तता के संबंध में अतिरिक्त नैतिक चिंताएं पैदा करती है। न्यूरोसाइंटिस्ट राफेल युस्ते ने मस्तिष्क-कंप्यूटर इंटरफेस और न्यूरोडेटा संग्रह में प्रगति के अभूतपूर्व संज्ञानात्मक प्रभाव को सक्षम करने की चेतावनी दी है, जिससे न्यूरोराइट्स सुरक्षा के लिए आह्वान किया गया है।

Sources & Further Reading

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Which specific US command is responsible for the psychological operations targeting Iran using pop culture memes, and why is this detail important for Prelims?

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) is responsible for managing this specific operation. For Prelims, knowing the specific command is crucial as UPSC often tests factual details about international bodies or military commands involved in significant global events.

Exam Tip

Remember CENTCOM (Central Command) is focused on the Middle East. A common trap could be mentioning other commands like EUCOM (Europe) or INDOPACOM (Indo-Pacific). Link CENTCOM with 'Central' for Middle East.

2. Why is the US military now using pop culture memes like SpongeBob and Iron Man for psychological operations, rather than more traditional methods?

The shift to pop culture memes is a strategic evolution in information warfare, aiming for more effective and subtle influence.

  • Cultural Resonance: Memes create content that is culturally resonant and easily shareable, increasing their reach and impact among target audiences, especially youth.
  • Covert Influence: They allow for influencing foreign audiences often without direct attribution to the US government, making the message appear organic and less like state propaganda.
  • Cognitive Impact: This approach aims to subtly influence perception, belief formation, and decision-making by leveraging familiar and engaging content, aligning with the concept of cognitive warfare.

Exam Tip

When analyzing such shifts, focus on 'why' (effectiveness, reach, covert nature) rather than just 'what' (the tools used). This helps in Mains answers.

3. What is the key distinction between 'psychological operations' (PsyOps) and 'cognitive warfare' as highlighted in the context of this news?

While PsyOps traditionally focused on influencing emotions and attitudes to achieve specific behavioral outcomes, cognitive warfare represents an evolution with a deeper focus.

  • PsyOps (Psychological Operations): Historically aimed at influencing the emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. Often involved overt or covert dissemination of information.
  • Cognitive Warfare: A broader, more modern concept that views 'cognition as a central domain of modern warfare.' It aims to influence perception, belief formation, and decision-making within target populations, moving beyond exclusive focus on physical destruction. It often leverages digital platforms and culturally resonant content for deeper, more subtle influence.

Exam Tip

Remember that cognitive warfare is a newer, broader term encompassing PsyOps, with a deeper focus on influencing the very thought processes and decision-making, not just immediate behavior.

4. How does this US military tactic align with the broader global trend of information warfare, as seen in examples like Russia's IRA and China's Three Warfare Doctrine?

This tactic is a clear manifestation of the evolving nature of information warfare in the digital age, sharing common characteristics with other global actors.

  • Digital Platform Reliance: Like Russia's Internet Research Agency (IRA) using fake social media accounts to shape political discourse, the US military is leveraging digital platforms (X/Twitter) for influence.
  • Covert Influence & Attribution: Similar to the IRA's tactics of creating division and eroding trust, and China's 'Three Warfare Doctrine' (psychological, public opinion, legal warfare) which integrates non-kinetic means, the US operation often lacks direct attribution, making it harder to trace back to the state actor.
  • Cognitive Domain Focus: All these examples highlight a shift towards influencing perceptions, beliefs, and decision-making within target populations, recognizing cognition as a central battleground, moving beyond traditional kinetic warfare.

Exam Tip

When comparing, focus on commonalities like digital platforms, covert nature, and the shift towards cognitive influence, rather than just listing examples.

5. What are the ethical and international law implications of a state military conducting covert influence operations using pop culture against another nation's population?

Such operations raise significant ethical and international law concerns, particularly regarding transparency, sovereignty, and the potential for manipulation.

  • Sovereignty Violation: Covert operations that aim to influence a foreign population's perceptions and decision-making can be seen as an infringement on the target nation's sovereignty and internal affairs.
  • Ethical Concerns: The use of deceptive tactics and lack of attribution raises questions about honesty and integrity in international relations. It can erode trust and manipulate public opinion without informed consent.
  • International Law Ambiguity: While direct military aggression is prohibited, the legal framework for information warfare and cognitive operations is still evolving and often ambiguous. There's no clear consensus on when such influence crosses the line into illegal interference or aggression.
  • Escalation Risk: These tactics can escalate tensions, contribute to misinformation, and potentially provoke retaliatory measures in the information domain, further destabilizing international relations.

Exam Tip

For Mains, always present a balanced view, discussing both the strategic advantages (for the perpetrator) and the ethical/legal challenges (for the international community).

6. What are the primary objectives of these meme-based psychological operations, and how might UPSC test the understanding of these objectives?

The core objective of these operations is to influence the target audience's cognitive processes, aligning with the broader strategic goals.

  • Influence Perception: To shape how foreign audiences view certain events, policies, or actors.
  • Belief Formation: To instill or alter specific beliefs within the target population.
  • Decision-Making: Ultimately, to influence the decisions made by individuals or groups within the target nation, aligning with the broader strategic goals of the operating power.

Exam Tip

UPSC might present a scenario or a statement and ask which objective it primarily serves. Focus on the 'cognition' aspect: influencing thoughts, beliefs, and decisions, rather than just spreading information.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding 'Cognitive Warfare': 1. NATO analysis describes it as an effort to target how individuals interpret reality and respond to information environments. 2. Its primary focus is on physical destruction rather than influencing perception. 3. Psychological operations are considered a foundational tool within the cognitive battlespace. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement 1 is CORRECT: NATO analysis explicitly describes cognitive warfare as an effort to target how individuals interpret reality and respond to information environments. This is directly stated in Source 1. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: Contemporary conflict, including cognitive warfare, seeks to influence perception, belief formation, and decision-making, rather than focusing exclusively on physical destruction. Source 1 clearly states this shift. Statement 3 is CORRECT: Psychological operations are indeed identified as a foundational tool within the cognitive battlespace, involving messaging designed to influence emotions, motives, and reasoning to advance strategic objectives. This is also from Source 1. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

2. With reference to 'Memetic Warfare', consider the following statements: 1. The concept is rooted in Richard Dawkins’ original idea of memes as replicating cultural units. 2. NATO analysts describe it as competition over narrative and social control in a social-media battlefield. 3. Memes are generally slow to spread and easily fact-checked due to their complex nature. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 2 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement 1 is CORRECT: Source 2 explicitly states that the concept of “memetic warfare” is rooted in Richard Dawkins’ original idea of memes as replicating cultural units. Statement 2 is CORRECT: NATO analysts have described memetic warfare as competition over narrative and social control in a social-media battlefield, as mentioned in Source 2. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: Source 2 highlights that memes are efficient because they are emotional, compressed, and frictionless, traveling faster than fact-checkers and lingering longer than official statements. This contradicts the idea that they are slow to spread and easily fact-checked. Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct.

3. Which of the following historical events or doctrines is NOT correctly matched with its description in the context of cognitive warfare and influence operations? A) Operation Mockingbird: CIA's covert relationships with U.S. journalists and media organizations until February 1976. B) Russia's Internet Research Agency: Operated covert social media personas to shape political discourse during the 2016 U.S. election. C) China's "Three Warfares" doctrine: Integrates psychological, public opinion, and legal warfare to shape perception without kinetic conflict. D) Cambridge Analytica scandal: Primarily involved overt propaganda campaigns targeting mass audiences through traditional media.

  • A.Operation Mockingbird
  • B.Russia's Internet Research Agency
  • C.China's "Three Warfares" doctrine
  • D.Cambridge Analytica scandal
Show Answer

Answer: D

Option A is CORRECTLY matched: Source 1 states that congressional investigations brought to light the extent of the CIA’s covert relationships with journalists and media organizations during the Cold War, confirming that "until February 1976" the Agency maintained covert relationships with "about 50 American journalists or employees of U.S. media organizations." Option B is CORRECTLY matched: Source 1 mentions modern intelligence investigations determined that Russia’s Internet Research Agency operated covert social media personas to shape political discourse during the 2016 U.S. election. Option C is CORRECTLY matched: Source 1 describes China’s “Three Warfares” doctrine as integrating psychological warfare, public opinion warfare, and legal warfare into a coordinated strategy designed to shape perception without kinetic conflict. Option D is NOT correctly matched: The Cambridge Analytica scandal demonstrated how psychographic data and behavioral profiling could be used to deliver *targeted political messaging tailored to psychological traits*, illustrating cognitive influence through *data-driven personalization* rather than overt propaganda campaigns targeting mass audiences through traditional media. This was about microtargeted messaging, not overt propaganda. Source 1 explicitly states this.

RS

About the Author

Ritu Singh

Governance & Constitutional Affairs Analyst

Ritu Singh writes about Polity & Governance at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →