For this article:

7 Mar 2026·Source: The Indian Express
6 min
Environment & EcologyInternational RelationsNEWS

UN Report Reveals Decline in Half of Migratory Wildlife Species

A UN report highlights that nearly half of the world's migratory wildlife species are declining despite international protection.

UPSC-PrelimsUPSC-MainsSSC

Quick Revision

1.

Almost half of the world's migratory wildlife species are experiencing population declines.

2.

One-fifth (22%) of migratory species protected under the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) are threatened with extinction.

3.

The report, 'State of the World's Migratory Species', is the first of its kind.

4.

44% of all CMS-listed species are showing population declines.

5.

Migratory fish are the most threatened, with 82% of their CMS-listed species facing extinction.

6.

In Central Asia, 97% of CMS-listed fish species are threatened.

7.

Only 3% of CMS-listed species have shown increasing populations.

8.

The main threats are overexploitation, habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation, along with climate change.

Key Numbers

@@half@@ of migratory wildlife species@@one-fifth (22%)@@ facing extinction@@44%@@ of CMS-listed species declining@@82%@@ of migratory fish species threatened@@97%@@ of Central Asian migratory fish species threatened@@3%@@ of species showing increasing populations

Visual Insights

Global Migratory Species Status (March 2026)

Key statistics from the 2026 interim UN report on migratory wildlife species, highlighting the alarming decline and extinction risk.

Migratory Species Populations Declining
49%+5%

This indicates a 5% increase in declining populations in just two years (since 2024), showing a worsening trend despite protection efforts.

Migratory Species Facing Extinction
24%+2%

A quarter of all migratory species are now at risk of extinction, a 2% rise since 2024, emphasizing the urgent need for stronger conservation.

CMS-listed Species Moved to Higher Extinction Risk
26

This includes 18 migratory shorebirds, highlighting specific vulnerable groups and the inadequacy of current protection measures for some species.

Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) Unprotected
47%

Nearly half of the critical habitats for migratory species lack formal protection, indicating a significant gap in on-ground conservation efforts.

Key Milestones in Migratory Species Conservation & Threats

A chronological overview of significant events, conventions, and reports related to migratory species conservation, leading up to the current situation.

The increasing recognition of transboundary environmental issues led to the establishment of international bodies and treaties like UNEP and CMS. Over decades, these frameworks have evolved to address new challenges, with recent reports highlighting the urgent need for stronger, coordinated action as threats like habitat loss, overexploitation, climate change, and diseases like HPAI intensify.

  • 1972United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) established at Stockholm Conference.
  • 1979Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) signed in Bonn, Germany.
  • 1983CMS (Bonn Convention) came into force, establishing a legal framework for international cooperation.
  • 2021Widespread emergence of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1, causing mass mortality in birds and mammals globally.
  • 2024First comprehensive 'State of World’s Migratory Species' report released, providing a baseline assessment.
  • 2026Interim 'State of World’s Migratory Species' report released, highlighting worsening trends.
  • March 23-29, 202615th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CMS (CMS COP 15) scheduled in Campo Grande, Brazil.

Mains & Interview Focus

Don't miss it!

The recent UN report on migratory wildlife species underscores a critical failure in global environmental governance, particularly concerning the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). Despite the existence of a dedicated international treaty, nearly half of these species are in decline, with one-fifth facing extinction. This stark reality demands a re-evaluation of current conservation paradigms and a more robust implementation strategy.

A primary driver of this decline is the pervasive issue of habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation. Development projects, agricultural expansion, and urbanization continue to encroach upon critical migratory routes and breeding grounds. For instance, the destruction of wetlands in India, vital stopover sites for many bird species, directly impacts their survival. Overexploitation, particularly in marine environments, also plays a significant role; 82% of CMS-listed migratory fish species are threatened, highlighting unsustainable fishing practices.

Furthermore, climate change exacerbates these pressures, altering migration patterns, food availability, and breeding cycles. Rising sea levels threaten coastal habitats, while extreme weather events disrupt delicate ecological balances. The report's findings, such as the 97% decline in Central Asian migratory fish, reveal regional vulnerabilities that demand targeted, transboundary interventions, not just generic policy statements.

Effective conservation requires a multi-sectoral approach that integrates environmental protection into broader economic and development planning. Nations must move beyond mere ratification of treaties to active enforcement and resource allocation. India, for example, could strengthen its Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, by specifically incorporating provisions for migratory species corridors and ensuring their protection across state boundaries. This would involve collaboration between the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change and state forest departments.

Ultimately, the report serves as a clarion call for urgent, coordinated action. Governments must prioritize the establishment and effective management of protected areas along migratory routes, combat illegal wildlife trade, and invest in climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Without such decisive interventions, the continued decline of these ecologically vital species is inevitable, signaling a broader collapse in ecosystem health.

Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper III (Environment & Ecology): Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment.

2.

GS Paper II (International Relations): Important international institutions, agencies and fora, their structure, mandate.

3.

Prelims: Questions on international conventions (CMS, IUCN), specific endangered species, threats to biodiversity, geographical distribution of migratory routes, diseases affecting wildlife.

4.

Mains: Analytical questions on effectiveness of international treaties, challenges in biodiversity conservation, human-wildlife conflict, impact of climate change on migratory species, India's role in global conservation efforts.

View Detailed Summary

Summary

A new UN report shows that almost half of the world's migratory animals, like birds and fish that travel long distances, are disappearing. Even though there's an international agreement to protect them, their homes are being destroyed, they are being hunted too much, and climate change is making it harder for them to survive.

An interim global report released on March 6, 2026, has warned that 49 percent of the migratory species populations protected under the UN’s Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) are declining, with 24 percent of species now facing extinction. This alarming trend shows a 5 percent increase in the threat of population decline and a 2 percent rise in extinction risk in just two years since the landmark State of World’s Migratory Species report was first released in 2024. Out of 1,189 total species listed under the global treaty, 582 migratory species are experiencing population decline challenges.

The report, which tracked changes in conservation status using data from the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List and scientific literature, highlighted that 26 CMS-listed species have moved to a higher extinction risk category, with 18 of these being migratory shorebirds. Species facing these risks include various bird species, ungulates like Wildebeest and Llama, freshwater fish, and marine species such as sharks, rays, and turtles. Notably, the mobility of the Mongolian Gazelle, known for long-distance movements, declined significantly between 2002 and 2021. Despite the overall decline, seven CMS-listed species, including the Saiga Antelope, Scimitar-Horned Oryx, and Mediterranean Monk Seal, have shown improvement in their conservation status. Vulture populations in South Asia are also slowly improving.

A significant concern flagged by the report is the highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1), which has caused substantial mortality across multiple continents in a broad range of birds and mammals, including Critically endangered African Penguins and South American Sea Lions. CMS Executive Secretary Amy Fraenkel stated that overexploitation, and habitat loss and fragmentation are the two greatest threats to migratory species worldwide, with barriers like railways, roads, fences, and pipelines particularly impacting ungulates in Central Asia. The report identified 9,372 Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) important for migratory species, but 47 percent of these areas are not covered by protected and conserved areas. The global extinction of the Appendix I-listed Slender-billed Curlew is now confirmed.

The interim report precedes the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CMS (CMS COP 15), scheduled from March 23-29 in Campo Grande, Brazil. The CMS, a legally binding global treaty signed in 1979 under the United Nations Environment Programme, aims to conserve migratory animals and their habitats across national borders. Its Appendix I lists 188 endangered migratory species, requiring strict protection from range states. For India, the report noted pronounced long-term declines in migratory shorebirds at coastal sites and extinction risks for sharks and rays in the northern Indian Ocean. Several Indian species, including the Great Indian Bustard, Asian Elephant, Bengal Florican, Siberian Crane, Hawksbill Sea Turtle, Olive Ridley turtle, and Leatherback Sea Turtle, are listed in Appendix I of CMS, underscoring the nation's critical role in their conservation. This topic is highly relevant for UPSC Prelims and Mains under Environment & Ecology (GS Paper III).

Background

The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), also known as the Bonn Convention, is a legally binding global treaty signed in 1979 under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Its primary objective is to conserve migratory animals and their habitats across national boundaries. The convention recognizes that migratory species, by their very nature, cross national borders and require international cooperation for their protection, as a single country cannot ensure their survival alone. CMS operates through two appendices: Appendix I lists migratory species that are endangered and require strict protection, including prohibition of hunting or capturing, habitat restoration, and addressing migration challenges. Appendix II lists migratory species that have an unfavourable conservation status and would benefit significantly from international cooperative agreements. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of threatened species serves as a crucial tool for assessing the global conservation status of species, providing a standardized set of rigorous scientific criteria to assign species to broad categories of extinction risk.

Latest Developments

The interim report, which updates the 2024 State of World’s Migratory Species, is being presented ahead of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CMS (CMS COP 15), scheduled from March 23-29 in Campo Grande, Brazil. This meeting is a critical platform for governments to debate and decide on future conservation actions for species that cross borders and oceans. A key focus of recent discussions and the report itself is the increasing threat posed by Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1, which has caused widespread mortality in both birds and mammals across multiple continents since 2021, adding significant pressure to already vulnerable migratory populations. Furthermore, there is a growing emphasis on identifying and protecting Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) and improving migration mapping initiatives, such as the Global Initiative on Ungulate Migration and BirdLife International's marine flyways work. Despite these efforts, the report highlights that 47 percent of identified KBAs important for migratory species are not yet covered by protected and conserved areas, indicating a significant gap in current conservation strategies. The upcoming CMS COP15 is also expected to launch a Global Initiative on Taking of Migratory Species, aiming to establish rules for legal, sustainable, and safe taking, acknowledging that domestic use can be a major threat.

Sources & Further Reading

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What specific numbers and percentages from this UN report are crucial for UPSC Prelims, and what common factual traps should I be aware of?

For Prelims, focus on the key percentages and the overall trend. Examiners often try to confuse similar-sounding numbers or dates.

  • Nearly half (49%) of CMS-protected migratory species populations are declining.
  • One-fifth (24%) of these species are now facing extinction, a 2% rise in two years.
  • The decline in population threat has increased by 5% in two years.
  • Out of 1,189 total CMS-listed species, 582 are declining.
  • Migratory fish are the most threatened, with 82% of their CMS-listed species facing extinction, and 97% of Central Asian migratory fish species threatened.

Exam Tip

Remember the 'half' (49%) for overall decline and 'one-fifth' (24%) for extinction risk. Don't confuse the 2024 'landmark' report with the 2026 'interim' update. Also, note the specific high percentages for migratory fish.

2. Beyond the report's findings, what key details about the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) itself are essential for Prelims, especially its origin and relation to other UN bodies?

The CMS, also known as the Bonn Convention, is a foundational treaty for migratory species conservation.

  • It's a legally binding global treaty signed in 1979.
  • It operates under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
  • Its primary objective is to conserve migratory animals and their habitats across national boundaries, recognizing their need for international cooperation.
  • The report uses data from the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List, showing collaboration between these bodies.

Exam Tip

Remember CMS = Bonn Convention, 1979, under UNEP. UPSC often tests the parent organization or founding year of such conventions. Also, note IUCN's role as a data source.

3. What kind of Mains question could be framed around this report on migratory species decline, and how should I approach structuring a 250-word answer?

A Mains question could ask about the significance of the report, challenges in migratory species conservation, and India's role.

  • Possible Question: 'Despite international conventions, migratory wildlife species continue to decline globally. Critically examine the reasons for this trend and suggest measures for more effective conservation, with a focus on India's potential contributions.'
  • Structure for 250 words: Introduction (Briefly mention the UN report and its alarming findings). Body Paragraph 1 (Reasons for decline: habitat loss, climate change, pollution, HPAI H5N1, lack of cross-border coordination). Body Paragraph 2 (Challenges in conservation: transboundary nature, enforcement issues, funding). Body Paragraph 3 (Measures: stronger international cooperation, habitat restoration, addressing HPAI, India's role in policy advocacy and local conservation). Conclusion (Reiterate urgency and call for collective action).

Exam Tip

Always start with the context (the report), then analyze causes/challenges, propose solutions, and include an India-specific angle if relevant. Use keywords like 'transboundary cooperation,' 'habitat fragmentation,' and 'climate change impacts.'

4. Why is an 'interim report' being released now, just two years after the first 'State of World's Migratory Species' report in 2024, and what does this urgency signify for global conservation?

The release of an interim report so soon highlights the alarming pace of decline and the urgent need for updated information and action.

  • The interim report updates the 2024 landmark report, showing a rapid deterioration in the status of migratory species.
  • It reveals a 5% increase in population decline threat and a 2% rise in extinction risk in just two years.
  • The report is strategically released ahead of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CMS (CMS COP 15) in Brazil.
  • This timing is crucial to inform governments and push for stronger conservation actions and policy decisions at the COP, emphasizing the escalating crisis.

Exam Tip

Understand 'interim' implies a quick update due to rapid changes, not a full new assessment. Connect it to the urgency of the upcoming CMS COP 15.

5. What makes the conservation of 'migratory species' uniquely challenging compared to other wildlife, and how does the CMS try to address this specific difficulty?

The very nature of migratory species, crossing national borders, makes their conservation inherently complex, requiring a coordinated international approach.

  • Transboundary Movement: Migratory species travel vast distances, often across multiple countries, oceans, and diverse habitats.
  • Varied Threats: They face different threats (habitat loss, poaching, pollution, climate change) in each region they pass through or reside in.
  • Jurisdictional Gaps: Conservation efforts in one country can be undermined if other countries along their migratory routes do not have similar protections.
  • CMS Approach: The CMS (Bonn Convention) directly addresses this by being a global treaty that promotes international cooperation and legally binding agreements among 'Range States' (countries through which migratory species pass) to protect these animals and their habitats.

Exam Tip

The core idea is 'international cooperation for transboundary species'. Think of it as a chain – a weak link anywhere affects the whole migratory route.

6. The report uses data from the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List. What is the significance of this collaboration, and what does it tell us about global conservation efforts?

The use of IUCN Red List data by the CMS report signifies a crucial collaboration between leading global conservation bodies, enhancing the credibility and scientific basis of the findings.

  • Credibility and Standardization: IUCN Red List is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of biological species. Using its data provides a standardized, scientifically robust assessment.
  • Complementary Roles: IUCN focuses on assessing species' extinction risk, while CMS focuses on conserving migratory species through international cooperation. Their collaboration ensures that policy (CMS) is informed by the best available scientific data (IUCN).
  • Holistic View: This integration allows for a more holistic understanding of the threats and conservation status of migratory species, moving beyond just their migratory routes to their overall vulnerability.
  • Resource Optimization: It avoids duplication of effort, as IUCN already has established methodologies and extensive data sets for species assessment, which CMS can leverage for its policy-making.

Exam Tip

Remember IUCN provides the 'what' (status of species) and CMS provides the 'how' (international framework for conservation). This synergy is key.

7. As India is a signatory to CMS, what are the implications of this report for India's wildlife conservation efforts, and what strategic role can India play at the upcoming CMS COP 15?

The report underscores the urgency for India to strengthen its conservation strategies for migratory species, many of which use Indian flyways and habitats.

  • Enhanced National Action: India hosts numerous migratory birds and animals. The report's findings necessitate a review and strengthening of national policies, habitat protection, and anti-poaching measures along migratory routes within India.
  • Regional Cooperation: India can leverage its position to foster greater regional cooperation with neighboring countries (e.g., through the Central Asian Flyway initiative) to ensure coordinated conservation efforts.
  • Advocacy at COP 15: At CMS COP 15, India can advocate for stronger global commitments, increased funding for conservation, and the adoption of effective measures to combat threats like habitat degradation and HPAI H5N1.
  • Knowledge Sharing: India can share its experiences and best practices in migratory species conservation, such as its efforts in wetland management and protected area networks, to contribute to global solutions.

Exam Tip

When discussing India's role, always think of internal actions (policy, enforcement) and external actions (international advocacy, regional cooperation).

8. What is the primary focus or expected outcome of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CMS (CMS COP 15) in Brazil, especially in light of the report's grim findings and the mention of HPAI H5N1?

CMS COP 15 is a critical platform for governments to respond to the alarming decline, debate future conservation actions, and address emerging threats like HPAI H5N1.

  • Policy Decisions: Governments will likely debate and decide on new or strengthened conservation actions for species that cross borders and oceans, aiming to reverse the declining trends.
  • Addressing HPAI H5N1: A key focus will be the increasing threat posed by Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1, with discussions on mitigation strategies to protect migratory birds without harming human health or livestock.
  • Enhanced Cooperation: The COP will seek to foster greater international cooperation and resource mobilization to implement conservation measures effectively across migratory routes.
  • Listing New Species: Parties may also consider proposals to add new species to the CMS appendices, granting them international protection.

Exam Tip

Connect the COP's purpose to the report's findings and the specific 'current development' (HPAI H5N1). It's about turning data into action.

9. How does the increasing threat from Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 complicate the conservation of migratory birds, and why is this disease specifically highlighted in the current developments?

HPAI H5N1 poses a dual challenge: it directly threatens migratory bird populations and creates a dilemma for conservationists due to its potential to spread to domestic poultry and humans.

  • Direct Mortality: HPAI H5N1 can cause widespread mortality among wild bird populations, including many migratory species, directly contributing to their decline.
  • Disease Spread: Migratory birds act as vectors, potentially carrying the virus across continents along their flyways, making containment extremely difficult.
  • Conservation Dilemma: Measures to control the disease (e.g., culling affected populations) can conflict with conservation goals of protecting endangered migratory species.
  • Economic and Public Health Concerns: The virus's ability to infect domestic poultry and, in rare cases, humans, adds a significant economic and public health dimension, making it a high-priority issue for governments and international bodies like CMS.

Exam Tip

Think of HPAI H5N1 as a 'double-edged sword' for migratory birds: it kills them and makes their conservation politically and practically complex due to human/economic risks.

10. The report mentions a 5% increase in population decline threat and a 2% rise in extinction risk in just two years. What does this rapid acceleration imply about the current state of global conservation efforts?

This rapid acceleration indicates that current global conservation efforts, despite international treaties like CMS, are largely insufficient to halt or reverse the decline of migratory species.

  • Inadequate Measures: The increase suggests that existing protection mechanisms, habitat restoration projects, and policy implementations are not keeping pace with the threats.
  • Escalating Threats: It points to the growing intensity of pressures like habitat destruction, climate change impacts, pollution, and emerging diseases (like HPAI H5N1), which are overwhelming current conservation capacities.
  • Urgent Need for Stronger Action: The acceleration serves as a stark warning, demanding more ambitious targets, increased funding, better enforcement, and more integrated, cross-sectoral approaches to conservation.
  • Policy-Implementation Gap: There might be a significant gap between the commitments made in international forums and their effective implementation on the ground across all 'Range States'.

Exam Tip

When analyzing 'implications of rapid change,' think about the effectiveness of current policies, the intensity of threats, and the urgency for future actions.

11. How does the continuous decline of migratory species, despite international protection under CMS, reflect on the effectiveness of global conservation treaties?

The continuous decline, despite CMS protection, indicates that while treaties provide a crucial framework, their effectiveness is often hampered by implementation challenges, lack of political will, and escalating environmental pressures.

  • Framework vs. Implementation: Treaties like CMS establish legal and cooperative frameworks, but their success depends on individual member states' commitment to implement and enforce the provisions effectively.
  • Funding and Resources: Many nations, especially developing ones, may lack the necessary financial resources, technical expertise, and infrastructure to fully implement conservation measures across vast migratory routes.
  • Transboundary Challenges: The very nature of migratory species means that conservation success requires consistent effort across multiple sovereign nations, making it vulnerable to political instability or differing priorities among 'Range States'.
  • Overwhelming Threats: Global threats like climate change, widespread habitat destruction, pollution, and unsustainable resource use are often so pervasive and powerful that current conservation efforts, even under treaties, struggle to counteract them effectively.

Exam Tip

When critically examining effectiveness, consider the gap between 'intent' (treaty goals) and 'impact' (real-world outcomes). Focus on systemic issues beyond the treaty itself.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the recent interim report on migratory species: 1. The report states that 49 percent of migratory species populations protected under the CMS are declining. 2. The threat of population decline has risen by 5 percent, and the percentage of species facing extinction has risen by 2 percent, over the last two years. 3. The report highlights that 18 migratory shorebirds have moved to a higher extinction risk category under the IUCN Red List. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: D

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The interim report explicitly states that 49 percent of the migratory species population protected by the UN’s Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) are declining. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The report highlights that the threat of population decline has risen by 5 percent in just two years, and the percentage of species facing extinction has risen by 2 percent over the same period. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The report specifically notes that 26 species listed under the treaty have moved to a higher extinction risk category under IUCN’s list, and among these, 18 are migratory shorebirds. All three statements are factually accurate as per the provided sources.

2. In the context of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), which of the following statements is NOT correct?

  • A.यह संयुक्त राष्ट्र पर्यावरण कार्यक्रम के तहत 1979 में हस्ताक्षरित एक कानूनी रूप से बाध्यकारी वैश्विक संधि है।
  • B.इसकी परिशिष्ट I में लुप्तप्राय प्रवासी प्रजातियाँ सूचीबद्ध हैं जिन्हें सख्त सुरक्षा की आवश्यकता है।
  • C.भारत से ग्रेट इंडियन बस्टर्ड और एशियाई हाथी CMS परिशिष्ट I में सूचीबद्ध प्रजातियों में से हैं।
  • D.अंतरिम रिपोर्ट इंगित करती है कि दक्षिण एशिया में गिद्धों की आबादी तेजी से घट रही है।
Show Answer

Answer: D

Option A is CORRECT: The CMS is indeed a legally binding global treaty signed in 1979 under the United Nations Environment Programme. Option B is CORRECT: CMS Appendix I lists endangered migratory species that require strict protection from range states. Option C is CORRECT: The Great Indian Bustard and Asian Elephant are explicitly mentioned as Indian species included in Appendix I of CMS. Option D is INCORRECT: The report states, 'vulture populations are improving slowly in South Asia,' directly contradicting the statement that they are facing rapid decline.

3. With reference to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, consider the following statements: 1. The IUCN Red List assigns species to broad categories of extinction risk based on a standardized set of rigorous scientific criteria. 2. A species categorized as 'Critically Endangered' on the IUCN Red List is considered to be at a higher risk of extinction than a species categorized as 'Vulnerable'. 3. The interim report on migratory species relies solely on the IUCN Red List for its data on extinction risk. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.केवल 1
  • B.केवल 1 और 2
  • C.केवल 2 और 3
  • D.1, 2 और 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The IUCN Red List is explicitly mentioned as assigning species to broad categories of extinction risk based on a standardized set of rigorous scientific criteria. Statement 2 is CORRECT: In the IUCN Red List hierarchy of extinction risk, 'Critically Endangered' (CR) signifies a much higher risk of extinction than 'Vulnerable' (VU). The order of increasing risk is Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: The interim report tracked changes based on data from the IUCN Red List *and* population trends and changes in extinction risk documented in scientific literature, not solely the IUCN Red List.

4. Which of the following are identified as major threats to migratory species in the recent UN report? 1. Overexploitation 2. Habitat loss and fragmentation 3. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) 4. Railways, roads, fences, and pipelines Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • A.केवल 1 और 2
  • B.केवल 1, 2 और 3
  • C.केवल 3 और 4
  • D.1, 2, 3 और 4
Show Answer

Answer: D

Statement 1 is CORRECT: CMS Executive Secretary Amy Fraenkel explicitly stated that 'Overexploitation' is one of the two greatest threats. Statement 2 is CORRECT: 'Habitat loss and fragmentation' is also identified by Amy Fraenkel as one of the two greatest threats. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The report noted that 'H5N1, the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)' has caused substantial mortality and added to pressures on migratory species. Statement 4 is CORRECT: The report specifically mentioned 'threats to migration of hooved animals or ungulates from railways, roads, fences, and pipelines, especially in Central Asia.' All four options are identified as major threats in the report.

Source Articles

RS

About the Author

Ritu Singh

Ecology & Sustainable Development Researcher

Ritu Singh writes about Environment & Ecology at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →