For this article:

7 Mar 2020·Source: The Hindu
3 min
Polity & GovernancePolity & GovernanceNEWS

Amit Shah Pledges to Eradicate Maoism by March End

Union Home Minister Amit Shah reaffirms government's resolve to eliminate Left Wing Extremism by March 31, 2020.

UPSC-PrelimsUPSC-MainsSSC

The government is working hard to stop a serious internal security problem called Maoism, or Left Wing Extremism, by the end of March 2020. They are doing this by using a mix of strong security actions and development work in affected areas. This effort has already reduced the number of areas troubled by Maoists.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah reiterated the government's firm commitment to eradicate Maoism, also known as Left Wing Extremism (LWE), by March 31, 2020. This pledge was part of a broader strategy that has already yielded significant results, with the number of LWE-affected districts in India decreasing from 90 to 30. Shah highlighted that this substantial reduction is a direct outcome of a comprehensive, multi-pronged strategy implemented by the government. The Union Home Minister further emphasized the government's dedicated efforts to ensure lasting peace and foster socio-economic development in these regions, aiming to integrate them fully into the national mainstream.

This commitment underscores India's ongoing battle against internal security threats and its focus on development as a key tool for conflict resolution. The topic is highly relevant for the UPSC Civil Services Examination, particularly for General Studies Paper III (Internal Security) and General Studies Paper II (Polity & Governance).

Expert Analysis

The Home Minister's declaration to eliminate Left Wing Extremism (LWE) by March 31, 2020, underscores a significant policy shift from containment to eradication. This ambitious target reflects the government's intensified focus on internal security, particularly in regions historically plagued by Maoist insurgency. A critical assessment reveals that sustained pressure on Maoist cadres, coupled with targeted development, has indeed yielded tangible results. The reported reduction in LWE-affected districts from 90 to 30 is a testament to the efficacy of the multi-pronged strategy. This approach integrates robust security operations, including cutting off financial lifelines, with crucial development initiatives. For instance, improved road connectivity and telecommunication infrastructure in erstwhile Maoist strongholds have facilitated both security force mobility and the delivery of government services, thereby addressing some root causes of disaffection. However, achieving complete eradication by a hard deadline presents considerable challenges. While the geographical footprint of LWE has shrunk, pockets of influence persist, particularly in states like Chhattisgarh, Odisha, and Telangana. These areas often feature difficult terrain and deep-seated socio-economic grievances that require more than just security interventions. A purely kinetic approach risks alienating local populations if development promises remain unfulfilled. Furthermore, the strategy must ensure the protection of tribal rights, which are often exploited by Maoist groups to garner support. The Forest Rights Act, 2006, for example, needs rigorous implementation to prevent land alienation and ensure tribal communities benefit from natural resources. Without addressing these fundamental issues, the underlying conditions that fuel extremism could resurface, even if the immediate threat is suppressed. Sustained inter-state coordination remains paramount, as Maoist groups frequently exploit administrative boundaries. The Ministry of Home Affairs plays a pivotal role in facilitating intelligence sharing and joint operations between affected states. A long-term strategy must also include robust rehabilitation programs for surrendered cadres and a concerted effort to integrate former extremists into mainstream society, preventing their re-radicalization. The government's zero-tolerance policy against LWE, while firm, must be balanced with a nuanced understanding of local dynamics. Eradication demands not just military success but also winning the hearts and minds of the populace through equitable development and justice. The ultimate success will be measured not merely by a deadline but by the establishment of lasting peace and prosperity in these vulnerable regions.

Visual Insights

Government's Progress & Target Against Maoism (LWE)

Key statistics highlighting the government's success in curbing Left Wing Extremism and its future eradication target.

Maoism Eradication Target
March 31, 2026

Union Home Minister Amit Shah's firm commitment to make India free from Maoist violence by this date.

Reduction in LWE Affected Districts
90 to 30-60 districts

Significant reduction in geographical footprint of Maoist influence, demonstrating effectiveness of multi-pronged strategy.

LWE Affected Regions & Strategic Focus Areas

Visualizing states historically part of the 'Red Corridor' and current areas of focus in anti-LWE operations, reflecting the shrinking influence of Maoists.

Loading interactive map...

📍Chhattisgarh📍Odisha📍Telangana📍West Bengal📍Jharkhand📍Bihar📍Andhra Pradesh

Quick Revision

1.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah pledged to eradicate Maoism by March 31, 2020.

2.

Maoism is also known as Left Wing Extremism (LWE).

3.

The number of LWE-affected districts has reduced from 90 to 30.

4.

The government employs a multi-pronged strategy against LWE.

5.

The strategy includes cutting off financial resources, strengthening security forces, improving development, and ensuring tribal rights.

6.

LWE incidents decreased by 26% in 2019 compared to 2014.

7.

Deaths due to LWE decreased by 39% in 2019 compared to 2014.

8.

States like Odisha, Chhattisgarh, and Telangana are still affected by LWE.

Key Dates

March 31, 202020192014

Key Numbers

31 (March 31 deadline)90 (original number of LWE-affected districts)30 (reduced number of LWE-affected districts)26% (reduction in LWE incidents)39% (reduction in LWE deaths)

Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper III: Internal Security challenges and their management in India, linkages of organized crime with terrorism, various security forces and agencies and their mandate.

2.

GS Paper II: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.

3.

GS Paper I: Salient features of Indian Society, role of women and women’s organization, population and associated issues, poverty and developmental issues, urbanization, their problems and their remedies.

More Information

Background

Left Wing Extremism (LWE), often referred to as Naxalism, originated in the Naxalbari village of West Bengal in 1967. It is an ideology rooted in communist principles, advocating for the overthrow of the state through armed struggle, primarily targeting perceived exploitation of tribal communities, landless labourers, and marginalized sections. The movement gained traction in resource-rich but underdeveloped regions, forming a 'Red Corridor' across central and eastern India. The government's approach to LWE has historically evolved from a law and order problem to a multi-faceted challenge requiring both security operations and development initiatives. Early responses were primarily police-centric, but over time, it became clear that addressing socio-economic grievances was crucial for long-term resolution. The Ministry of Home Affairs considers LWE as one of the gravest internal security threats facing the nation.

Latest Developments

In recent years, the government has intensified its efforts against LWE through a comprehensive strategy known as the SAMADHAN doctrine. This doctrine encompasses Smart leadership, Aggressive strategy, Motivation and training, Actionable intelligence, Dashboards and KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), Harnessing technology, Action plan for each theatre, and No access to financing. This approach combines robust security measures with focused development interventions, including infrastructure projects, improved governance, and welfare schemes in affected areas. Significant progress has been made in reducing the geographical footprint of LWE, with a notable decline in violence and the number of affected districts. The government has also focused on strengthening local police forces, improving inter-state coordination, and implementing surrender and rehabilitation policies to encourage extremists to return to the mainstream. The Aspirational Districts Programme also plays a role in bringing development to some of these historically neglected regions, thereby addressing root causes of discontent.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. The news highlights a reduction in LWE-affected districts from 90 to 30. What specific number or detail related to this statistic is most likely to be a Prelims trap?

While the reduction from 90 to 30 districts is significant, a common Prelims trap could be confusing the pledge deadline (March 31, 2020) for eradication with the period over which this reduction occurred. The summary states this reduction "has already yielded significant results," implying it happened before the 2020 deadline, as part of an ongoing strategy. UPSC might also test the definition of an LWE-affected district or the baseline year for the 90 districts.

Exam Tip

Remember the deadline (March 31, 2020) is for eradication, not for the reduction already achieved. Also, be aware that the 'Red Corridor' is a historical term, and its current extent is much smaller.

2. Why is the government emphasizing "socio-economic development" alongside robust security measures to tackle LWE? Isn't it primarily a law and order problem?

While LWE has a significant law and order dimension, its roots lie in socio-economic grievances. Naxalism originated from perceived exploitation of tribal communities, landless labourers, and marginalized sections. Addressing these underlying issues through development helps:

  • Reduces local support for extremists by improving living conditions.
  • Integrates marginalized populations into the national mainstream, fostering trust in the state.
  • Provides alternatives to joining extremist groups, especially for youth.
  • Creates sustainable peace by removing the breeding ground for discontent.

Exam Tip

When writing Mains answers on LWE, always ensure a balanced approach, discussing both security and development aspects. Avoid focusing solely on one.

3. The SAMADHAN doctrine is mentioned as a comprehensive strategy. What does the acronym SAMADHAN stand for, and which specific components are most likely to be tested in Prelims or require detailed explanation in Mains?

SAMADHAN is an acronym for the government's multi-pronged strategy against LWE:

  • Smart leadership
  • Aggressive strategy
  • Motivation and training
  • Actionable intelligence
  • Dashboards and KPIs (Key Performance Indicators)
  • Harnessing technology
  • Action plan for each theatre
  • No access to financing

Exam Tip

Memorize the full form of SAMADHAN. In Mains, use it as a framework to structure your answer on LWE strategy, elaborating on 2-3 key components.

4. What is the fundamental difference between 'Maoism' and 'Left Wing Extremism' (LWE) as used in the news, and why does the government often use both terms?

Maoism refers to the political ideology, a variant of Marxism-Leninism developed by Mao Zedong, advocating for armed revolutionary struggle, particularly by peasants, to overthrow the existing state. Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is the broader term used by the Indian government to describe the manifestation of this ideology and its associated violence within India. The government uses LWE for official classification and policy formulation, as it encompasses all groups subscribing to this extremist ideology and engaging in violence. Maoism is the philosophical underpinning of these groups.

Exam Tip

Understand that Maoism is the 'what' (ideology), and LWE is the 'how' and 'where' (its manifestation and impact in India). Don't get confused by their interchangeable use in general discourse.

5. Amit Shah pledged to eradicate Maoism by March 31, 2020. What are the potential challenges or criticisms of setting such a specific, ambitious deadline for an issue as complex as LWE?

While deadlines can motivate action, setting a rigid one for LWE eradication faces several challenges:

  • Pressure on Security Forces: It might lead to increased pressure on forces, potentially compromising due process or human rights in the rush to meet targets.
  • Ignoring Root Causes: A focus on quick eradication might sideline long-term socio-economic development, which is crucial for sustainable peace.
  • Resurgence Risk: If the underlying grievances are not fully addressed, the movement could resurface in new forms or areas, making the eradication temporary.
  • Defining 'Eradication': It's difficult to define complete eradication, as isolated incidents or ideological remnants might persist even after significant reduction.

Exam Tip

In an interview, present a balanced view. Acknowledge the positive intent of a deadline (motivation, accountability) but also discuss the practical difficulties and potential negative consequences.

6. How does the government's focus on "integrating LWE-affected regions fully into the national mainstream" connect with broader internal security goals beyond just eradicating extremism?

Integrating LWE-affected regions into the national mainstream is a holistic approach that goes beyond mere law and order. It aims to achieve:

  • Sustainable Peace: By addressing root causes like underdevelopment and lack of opportunities, it prevents future radicalization and ensures lasting peace.
  • Economic Development: Bringing these regions into the mainstream opens them up for infrastructure projects, investment, and job creation, contributing to national growth.
  • Improved Governance: It helps establish effective administration, delivery of public services, and rule of law, strengthening the state's legitimacy.
  • National Unity: Fosters a sense of belonging among marginalized communities, reducing alienation and strengthening the fabric of national unity.

Exam Tip

When discussing internal security in Mains, remember that it's not just about military/police action but also about good governance, development, and social inclusion.

7. Naxalism originated in Naxalbari village in 1967. How has the movement evolved geographically and ideologically since then, and is the 'Red Corridor' still an accurate representation of its spread?

Naxalism, rooted in communist principles, initially focused on agrarian issues in West Bengal. It later spread to resource-rich but underdeveloped tribal areas across central and eastern India, forming the 'Red Corridor'. Geographically, the number of LWE-affected districts has significantly reduced from 90 to 30, indicating a shrinking of the traditional 'Red Corridor'. Ideologically, while still advocating armed struggle, the focus has broadened to include issues of tribal rights, displacement, and exploitation by mining companies, often exploiting local grievances.

Exam Tip

While 'Red Corridor' is a historically important term, for current affairs, emphasize the reduction in its extent and the government's efforts to shrink it further.

8. The news mentions a "multi-pronged strategy" against LWE. If a Mains question asks to "critically examine" this strategy, what are the key aspects to include for a balanced answer?

To critically examine the multi-pronged strategy, you should include both its strengths and potential weaknesses/challenges:

  • Strengths: Holistic Approach (combines security and development), Results-Oriented (evident in reduction of affected districts, incidents, and deaths), Adaptive (incorporates modern doctrines like SAMADHAN).
  • Challenges/Criticisms: Implementation Gaps (ensuring effective delivery of development benefits), Human Rights Concerns (potential issues in security operations), Defining 'Eradication' (long-term sustainability and ideological remnants), Political Will (sustaining resources and commitment over time).

Exam Tip

For "critically examine" questions, always present both the positive aspects (achievements, strengths) and the negative aspects (challenges, criticisms, areas for improvement).

9. If you were an advisor to the Home Minister, what would be your top 2-3 recommendations to ensure the 'No access to financing' component of SAMADHAN is truly effective against LWE?

To effectively cut off financing for LWE, my recommendations would be:

  • Strengthen Intelligence & Enforcement: Enhance real-time intelligence gathering on extortion networks, illegal mining, and levy collection, followed by swift and targeted enforcement actions by financial intelligence units and local police.
  • Community Engagement & Protection: Implement robust witness protection programs and incentivize local communities to report extortion attempts without fear of reprisal, coupled with alternative livelihood support.
  • Inter-State Coordination: Improve coordination among LWE-affected states to track cross-border financial flows and operationalize joint task forces specifically targeting financial conduits and front organizations.

Exam Tip

For interview questions asking for recommendations, always provide actionable and specific points, not just general ideas. Link them back to the core problem.

10. What should UPSC aspirants monitor in the coming months/years regarding LWE, especially considering the stated deadline of March 31, 2020, has passed?

Aspirants should monitor the following:

  • Government Reports & Data: Look for official reports from the Ministry of Home Affairs on the current status of LWE, including incident rates, casualties, and further reduction in affected districts.
  • Development Initiatives: Track the progress of specific development projects (roads, schools, health centers) in former LWE strongholds and their impact on local populations.
  • Tribal Rights & Governance: Observe any new policies or amendments related to tribal rights (e.g., PESA Act, Forest Rights Act implementation) and improvements in local governance.
  • Resurgence or New Challenges: Be alert to any signs of LWE resurgence in new areas or changes in their tactics, which could indicate evolving threats.

Exam Tip

Focus on the impact of policies and the ground reality rather than just government pronouncements. Look for independent analyses and reports.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding Left Wing Extremism (LWE) in India: 1. The number of LWE-affected districts in India has reduced from 90 to 30 as per recent government statements. 2. The SAMADHAN doctrine is a comprehensive strategy adopted by the government to combat LWE. 3. LWE is primarily concentrated in the North-Eastern states of India.

  • A.1 only
  • B.1 and 2 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: Union Home Minister Amit Shah highlighted the significant reduction in LWE-affected districts from 90 to 30, attributing it to a multi-pronged strategy. This fact is directly from the provided summary. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The SAMADHAN doctrine is indeed a comprehensive strategy adopted by the government to combat LWE, combining security and development initiatives. This is a well-established fact in the context of India's internal security. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: LWE, or Naxalism, is primarily concentrated in the 'Red Corridor' which spans parts of central and eastern India, including states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Maharashtra, not the North-Eastern states. The North-Eastern states face different insurgency challenges.

2. Which of the following is NOT a component of the government's multi-pronged strategy to combat Left Wing Extremism (LWE) in India? A) Robust security operations and intelligence gathering. B) Socio-economic development projects in affected regions. C) Exclusive reliance on military forces for counter-insurgency operations. D) Implementation of surrender and rehabilitation policies for extremists.

  • A.Robust security operations and intelligence gathering.
  • B.Socio-economic development projects in affected regions.
  • C.Exclusive reliance on military forces for counter-insurgency operations.
  • D.Implementation of surrender and rehabilitation policies for extremists.
Show Answer

Answer: C

The government's strategy against LWE is explicitly described as 'multi-pronged' and comprehensive, combining security and development. Options A, B, and D are all integral parts of this strategy. Robust security operations and intelligence (A) are crucial. Socio-economic development (B) addresses the root causes. Surrender and rehabilitation policies (D) aim to bring extremists back to the mainstream. Option C, 'Exclusive reliance on military forces for counter-insurgency operations,' is incorrect because the strategy involves a significant role for state police forces, Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), and local administration, alongside development initiatives, rather than exclusive reliance on the military. The Indian Army is generally not directly involved in LWE operations, which are primarily handled by CAPFs and state police.

3. The term 'Red Corridor' is sometimes used in the context of Left Wing Extremism (LWE) in India. Which of the following best describes the 'Red Corridor'?

  • A.A network of highways connecting major LWE-affected cities.
  • B.A geographical region in central and eastern India affected by LWE.
  • C.A specific economic zone designated for development in LWE areas.
  • D.A strategic military route used for counter-insurgency operations.
Show Answer

Answer: B

The 'Red Corridor' refers to a contiguous geographical region in central and eastern India that has historically been significantly affected by Left Wing Extremism (LWE) or Naxalism. This area spans across several states, including parts of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Bihar, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Maharashtra. It is characterized by dense forests, tribal populations, and often, a lack of development and governance, which LWE groups exploit. Options A, C, and D do not accurately describe the 'Red Corridor' in the context of LWE.

Source Articles

RS

About the Author

Richa Singh

Public Policy Researcher & Current Affairs Writer

Richa Singh writes about Polity & Governance at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →

GKSolverToday's News