For this article:

3 Mar 2026·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
RS
Richa Singh
|International
International RelationsPolity & GovernanceEDITORIAL

Iran's Resilience: US and Israel's Underestimation of Regional Power

Analysis suggests US and Israel may underestimate Iran's resilience and regional influence.

UPSCSSC
Iran's Resilience: US and Israel's Underestimation of Regional Power

Photo by Mohammad Amirahmadi

Visual Insights

Iran's Regional Influence

Map showing countries and regions where Iran has significant influence through support for non-state actors and other means.

Loading interactive map...

📍Lebanon📍Syria📍Yemen📍Iraq📍Gaza Strip

Mains & Interview Focus

Don't miss it!

To fully grasp the complexities surrounding Iran's regional influence, several key concepts need to be understood. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, was an agreement reached in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States—plus Germany) and the European Union. Under the JCPOA, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear program in exchange for relief from economic sanctions. The recent discussions about Iran's resilience are directly tied to the JCPOA's uncertain future, especially after the U.S. withdrawal in 2018, which has led Iran to gradually reduce its compliance with the deal's restrictions.

Another crucial concept is proxy warfare, which involves states using third parties as substitutes for fighting each other directly. Iran's support for non-state actors like Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen is a prime example of this. These groups allow Iran to exert influence in regional conflicts without directly engaging in military confrontations with other states. Understanding this strategy is essential to assessing Iran's regional power projection and its ability to withstand external pressures.

Finally, the concept of deterrence plays a significant role in the dynamics between Iran, the U.S., and Israel. Deterrence refers to the ability to discourage an adversary from taking action by instilling fear of the consequences. Iran's development of ballistic missiles and its nuclear program are often viewed as attempts to establish a credible deterrent against potential attacks. The effectiveness of this deterrence, and the perceptions of it by the U.S. and Israel, directly influence their strategic planning and policymaking towards Iran. For UPSC aspirants, understanding these concepts is crucial for both Prelims and Mains, particularly in the context of international relations and security studies. Questions may arise concerning the JCPOA, proxy warfare strategies, and the implications of Iran's deterrence capabilities on regional stability.

Editorial Analysis

The author argues that the US and Israel may be underestimating Iran's resilience and regional power, suggesting a need for a more nuanced understanding of Iran's capabilities for effective policymaking. The author emphasizes that Iran has developed significant capabilities to withstand external pressures and maintain its influence in the Middle East.

Main Arguments:

  1. The US and Israel may not be fully prepared for Iran's resilience and ability to project power in the Middle East.
  2. Iran has developed significant capabilities to withstand external pressures and maintain its influence in the region.
  3. A more nuanced understanding of Iran's strengths and weaknesses is necessary for effective policymaking and strategic planning by the US and Israel.

Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper 2: International Relations - Impact of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India's interests.

2.

Understanding Iran's foreign policy and its implications for regional stability.

3.

Potential questions on the JCPOA, Iran's nuclear program, and its relations with the US and Israel.

View Detailed Summary

Summary

This article talks about how the United States and Israel might not fully understand how strong and resilient Iran is in the Middle East. It suggests that Iran has found ways to withstand pressure from other countries and keep its influence in the region.

The United States and Israel may be underestimating Iran's resilience and its capacity to project power in the Middle East. Iran has developed capabilities that allow it to withstand external pressures and maintain its regional influence. A more nuanced understanding of Iran's strengths and weaknesses is necessary for effective policymaking and strategic planning by the US and Israel.

The article also addresses Iran's nuclear program and its support for non-state actors, which adds to the complexities of dealing with Iran's approach to regional security. This is relevant for UPSC exams, particularly in the International Relations section of GS Paper 2.

Background

The relationship between Iran, the United States, and Israel has been fraught with tension for decades. The Iranian Revolution of 1979 led to the establishment of an Islamic Republic, fundamentally altering the regional balance of power and leading to strained relations with the U.S. and Israel, who viewed the new regime with suspicion. The Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) further shaped Iran's strategic outlook, leading it to prioritize self-reliance in defense and to develop asymmetric warfare capabilities. This conflict also solidified Iran's support for regional allies and proxies as a means of projecting influence and countering perceived threats. The JCPOA, signed in 2015, represented a brief period of diplomatic engagement between Iran and the West. However, the U.S. withdrawal from the agreement in 2018 under the Trump administration and the subsequent reimposition of sanctions have led to increased tensions and a return to a more confrontational posture.

Latest Developments

In recent years, Iran has faced increasing economic pressure due to U.S. sanctions, leading to domestic unrest and calls for economic reform. Despite these challenges, Iran has continued to invest in its military capabilities and to support its regional allies. The Biden administration has expressed a willingness to rejoin the JCPOA, but negotiations have stalled due to disagreements over the sequencing of sanctions relief and Iran's compliance with the agreement. The election of Ebrahim Raisi as Iran's president in 2021 has further complicated the prospects for a diplomatic breakthrough. Looking ahead, the future of Iran's relationship with the U.S. and Israel remains uncertain. The potential for escalation remains high, particularly in light of ongoing tensions in the region and the unresolved issues surrounding Iran's nuclear program.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why are the US and Israel potentially underestimating Iran's power NOW, despite decades of engagement and observation?

The underestimation likely stems from a few factors: * Iran's adaptation: Iran has adapted to sanctions and external pressures, developing asymmetric warfare capabilities and strengthening regional alliances that may not be fully appreciated. * Focus on Nuclear Program: The intense focus on Iran's nuclear program might overshadow its advancements in conventional military capabilities and regional influence through non-state actors. * Political Bias: Political biases and a desire to see Iran weakened might lead to an underestimation of its actual strength and resilience.

Exam Tip

Remember that underestimation of an adversary's capabilities is a recurring theme in international relations. Consider examples like the US and Vietnam, or Russia and Ukraine. This provides historical context for your answers.

2. How could Iran's resilience and regional influence, if underestimated, affect India's interests in the Middle East?

Underestimating Iran could lead to instability that affects India in several ways: * Energy Security: Instability in the region could disrupt oil supplies, impacting India's energy security. * Connectivity Projects: Projects like the Chabahar Port, which provides India access to Afghanistan and Central Asia, could be jeopardized by regional conflicts. * Indian Diaspora: A large Indian diaspora resides in the Middle East; increased instability could put them at risk.

Exam Tip

When discussing India's interests, always consider energy security, diaspora safety, and regional connectivity projects. These are key pillars of India's foreign policy.

3. What specific aspect of Iran's capabilities would be most crucial for UPSC Prelims, and what would be a likely 'trap' option?

A testable fact is Iran's development of asymmetric warfare capabilities. A likely trap would be attributing specific advanced weaponry systems (e.g., a particular missile defense system) to Iran that it does not actually possess or that are still under development. Examiners might offer options that sound plausible but are factually incorrect regarding Iran's military arsenal.

Exam Tip

Focus on broad capabilities (asymmetric warfare, cyber warfare) rather than specific weapon systems, unless the system has been widely publicized and verified by multiple sources.

4. If a Mains question asks 'Critically examine Iran's role in regional security,' what two opposing viewpoints should I present?

You should present two opposing viewpoints: * Iran as a destabilizing force: Highlight its support for non-state actors, its nuclear program, and its confrontational rhetoric towards regional rivals. * Iran as a pragmatic actor: Acknowledge its efforts to combat ISIS, its role in maintaining stability in certain areas, and its legitimate security concerns given its history and geopolitical position.

Exam Tip

In 'critically examine' questions, always present both positive and negative aspects, and then offer your own balanced conclusion.

5. How does the potential underestimation of Iran's power connect to the larger trend of misjudging regional actors in the Middle East?

It reflects a recurring pattern of external powers misjudging the agency and resilience of regional actors. This often stems from: * Imposing external frameworks: Applying Western-centric models of state behavior that don't accurately reflect local dynamics. * Overreliance on specific data points: Focusing on economic indicators or military strength while ignoring social, political, and ideological factors. * Ignoring historical context: Failing to appreciate the long-term impact of historical grievances and power dynamics.

Exam Tip

When analyzing international relations, always consider the limitations of applying external frameworks to complex regional situations. Look for factors that are unique to the region's history, culture, and politics.

6. What is the India angle in this news about the US, Israel, and Iran?

India has significant stakes in the stability of the Middle East. It needs good relations with all the countries in the region. Any escalation between Iran, the US and Israel will affect India's energy security, trade routes, and the safety of the Indian diaspora.

Exam Tip

Always look for the implications of international events on the Indian diaspora, energy security and trade. These are the most important factors for India.

7. This situation with Iran sounds similar to the situation with North Korea. What's the actual difference?

While both Iran and North Korea face international sanctions and have nuclear ambitions, key differences exist: * Regional Influence: Iran wields significant regional influence through its network of allies and proxies, whereas North Korea's influence is largely limited to the Korean Peninsula. * Economic Integration: Iran is more integrated into the global economy than North Korea, despite sanctions. * Geostrategic Importance: The Middle East, where Iran is located, holds far greater geostrategic importance due to its energy resources and proximity to major trade routes, compared to the Korean Peninsula.

Exam Tip

When comparing countries, consider their regional influence, economic integration, and geostrategic importance. These factors shape their foreign policy and international relations.

8. Will this news about Iran's resilience be more relevant to GS Paper 2 or GS Paper 3, and from what angle?

This is primarily relevant to GS Paper 2 (International Relations). The key angle is the impact of Iran's actions and the US/Israel's policies on regional stability and India's interests. It could also touch upon GS Paper 3 if the discussion extends to the economic impact of sanctions and oil prices.

Exam Tip

For GS Paper 2, focus on the geopolitical implications and the impact on India's foreign policy. For GS Paper 3, concentrate on the economic dimensions.

9. What should India's response be to the potential underestimation of Iran's power?

India should adopt a balanced approach: * Maintain Dialogue: Continue diplomatic engagement with all parties, including Iran, the US, and Israel. * Promote De-escalation: Encourage dialogue and peaceful resolution of disputes. * Protect Interests: Safeguard its economic and strategic interests in the region, particularly regarding energy security and connectivity projects.

Exam Tip

India's foreign policy is generally characterized by non-alignment and strategic autonomy. Any answer should reflect this balanced approach.

10. What specific facts from the Background Context are most important to remember for Prelims?

The most important fact is the Iranian Revolution of 1979 and its impact on relations with the US and Israel. Understanding that this event fundamentally altered the regional power balance is crucial. Also, remember the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) and its role in shaping Iran's strategic outlook.

Exam Tip

Focus on landmark events and their long-term consequences. The Iranian Revolution is a key turning point in Middle Eastern history.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)? 1. It was signed in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 countries (the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany). 2. Under the JCPOA, Iran agreed to completely dismantle its nuclear program. 3. The United States withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The JCPOA was indeed signed in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 countries (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, plus Germany). Statement 2 is INCORRECT: Iran agreed to LIMIT its nuclear program, not completely dismantle it. The agreement imposed restrictions on Iran's uranium enrichment, plutonium production, and other nuclear activities. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The United States withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 under the Trump administration.

Source Articles

RS

About the Author

Richa Singh

International Relations Enthusiast & UPSC Writer

Richa Singh writes about International Relations at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →