For this article:

14 Feb 2026·Source: The Hindu
3 min
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesNEWS

BJP Legislator's Claim Sparks Controversy Over Land Occupation in Jammu

BJP legislator alleges Kashmiris illegally occupy land in Jammu, triggering political row.

BJP legislator Vikram Randhawa claimed that people of Kashmir origin were illegally occupying land in Jammu city, leading to strong reactions from various political parties, including the ruling National Conference (NC). Randhawa stated that residents of Kashmir valley have encroached upon land belonging to the Jammu Development Authority (JDA) in the city.

He alleged that the government was not taking steps to clear the encroachment and claimed it was a sinister move to change the demography of Jammu. The NC and other opposition parties objected to the statement, with some accusing the BJP of spreading politics of hate.

Key Facts

1.

BJP legislator Vikram Randhawa made the claim.

2.

The claim involves land in Jammu city.

3.

The land allegedly belongs to the Jammu Development Authority (JDA).

4.

The legislator alleges a sinister move to change Jammu's demography.

5.

National Conference (NC) and other parties have reacted strongly.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: Polity and Governance - Issues related to land rights and demographic changes

2.

GS Paper III: Economy - Impact of land reforms on economic development

3.

Potential question types: Statement-based, analytical questions on the impact of Article 370 abrogation

In Simple Words

A politician said people from Kashmir are taking land illegally in Jammu. He thinks this might change who lives there. This has made other politicians angry and worried.

India Angle

In India, where people move between states for work or other reasons, this kind of statement can create tension. It touches on sensitive issues like who belongs where and how resources are shared.

For Instance

Imagine if your neighbor started building a structure on your land. You'd be upset, right? This is similar, but on a larger scale with political implications.

It matters because it can affect how people from different regions get along. It also raises questions about fairness and equal rights.

Land disputes can quickly become political battles when they involve questions of identity and belonging.

Visual Insights

Land Encroachment Concerns in Jammu

This map highlights Jammu city, where a BJP legislator has raised concerns about land encroachment by people of Kashmir origin. It shows the location of Jammu within Jammu and Kashmir.

Loading interactive map...

📍Jammu and Kashmir
More Information

Background

The issue of land rights and demographic changes in Jammu and Kashmir has a complex history. The erstwhile state had unique laws regarding land ownership, primarily aimed at preserving the region's distinct identity. Article 370 of the Indian Constitution granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir, allowing it to have its own constitution and laws, including those related to land ownership. Over time, various amendments and interpretations of these laws have led to debates and concerns about demographic shifts. The abrogation of Article 370 in 2019 brought significant changes to the legal framework, including the application of central laws to the region. This has opened up discussions about land ownership and residency rights, leading to diverse opinions and political reactions. The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, formally divided the state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. This act altered the administrative and legal landscape, impacting land laws and governance structures. The concept of domicile became crucial in determining residency and land ownership rights in the newly formed Union Territories.

Latest Developments

Following the abrogation of Article 370, the government has introduced new land laws aimed at promoting development and investment in Jammu and Kashmir. These changes have sparked debates about the potential impact on the region's demography and the rights of local residents. Various political parties and social groups have expressed concerns about the implications of these new laws.

The issue of land encroachment and illegal settlements remains a significant challenge in Jammu and Kashmir. The government has initiated measures to identify and remove encroachments on state land, but these efforts have faced resistance and legal challenges. The debate over land rights is closely linked to broader discussions about identity, culture, and political representation in the region.

Looking ahead, the focus is on ensuring equitable access to land resources and promoting sustainable development in Jammu and Kashmir. The government aims to strike a balance between attracting investment and protecting the rights of local communities. The ongoing dialogue between different stakeholders is crucial for addressing the complex issues surrounding land ownership and demographic change.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the central issue in the recent controversy involving the BJP legislator in Jammu?

The main issue is the allegation by a BJP legislator that people of Kashmir origin are illegally occupying land in Jammu, specifically land belonging to the Jammu Development Authority (JDA). This has led to political reactions and accusations of attempts to change the demography of Jammu.

2. What are the key allegations made by the BJP legislator, Vikram Randhawa?

Vikram Randhawa alleges that residents of the Kashmir valley have encroached upon land belonging to the Jammu Development Authority (JDA) in Jammu city. He also claims that the government is not taking sufficient steps to clear these encroachments and that this inaction is a deliberate attempt to alter the demography of Jammu.

3. What is the historical context of land rights and demographic changes in Jammu and Kashmir?

Historically, Jammu and Kashmir had unique land laws, primarily aimed at preserving the region's distinct identity. Article 370 granted special autonomous status, allowing the state to have its own constitution and laws, including those related to land ownership. Following the abrogation of Article 370, new land laws have been introduced, sparking debates about their potential impact on the region's demography.

4. How might the controversy over land occupation in Jammu impact common citizens?

The controversy can potentially create social divisions and impact community relations. Concerns about demographic changes can lead to feelings of insecurity among local residents. Furthermore, disputes over land ownership can affect access to resources and livelihoods.

5. What are the reactions of different political parties to the BJP legislator's claims?

National Conference (NC) and other opposition parties have strongly objected to the statement made by the BJP legislator. Some parties have accused the BJP of spreading politics of hate and division.

6. What is the estimated area of JDA land allegedly under encroachment, and what percentage is claimed to be by Kashmiris?

It is alleged that approximately 16,000 kanals (1,999.9998 acres) of JDA land are under encroachment. According to the legislator's claim, about 90% of this encroachment is by people of Kashmir origin.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019: 1. It bifurcated the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories. 2. The Act altered the provisions related to land ownership in the region. 3. Ladakh was created as a Union Territory with a legislature. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: A

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, indeed bifurcated the state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The Act brought changes to the land laws applicable in the region. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: Ladakh was created as a Union Territory WITHOUT a legislature. Jammu and Kashmir was created with a legislature.

2. In the context of land rights in Jammu and Kashmir, what is the significance of the term 'Domicile' after the abrogation of Article 370? A) It determines voting rights for all residents. B) It defines eligibility for government jobs and land ownership. C) It grants special privileges to Kashmiri migrants. D) It restricts the entry of non-state subjects into the region.

  • A.A
  • B.B
  • C.C
  • D.D
Show Answer

Answer: B

The term 'Domicile' became significant after the abrogation of Article 370 as it defines the eligibility criteria for government jobs and land ownership in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The domicile certificate is required to prove residency and claim these rights.

3. Which of the following statements is NOT correct regarding Article 370 of the Indian Constitution? A) It granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. B) It allowed the state to have its own constitution. C) It prevented the application of all central laws to the state. D) It was introduced in 1952.

  • A.A
  • B.B
  • C.C
  • D.D
Show Answer

Answer: D

Article 370 was NOT introduced in 1952. It was introduced in 1949 and became a part of the Indian Constitution. The other statements are correct: it granted special autonomous status, allowed the state to have its own constitution, and prevented the application of all central laws to the state without its concurrence.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News