Rahul Gandhi Criticizes Trade Deal, Faces Expulsion Call
Rahul Gandhi targets PM over trade deal, BJP MP seeks his expulsion.
Photo by Ravi Sharma
Key Facts
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey gave notice for a substantive motion against Rahul Gandhi seeking his "immediate expulsion" from Lok Sabha.
Rahul Gandhi targeted the Prime Minister and the government over the trade deal with the US.
Rahul Gandhi accused the government of compromising India's energy security and farm interests.
Rahul Gandhi stated he would not budge and stands with the farmers.
Dubey submitted a notice seeking Gandhi's expulsion after initiating an inquiry to examine his unethical conduct.
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper 2: Parliament and State Legislatures - structure, functioning, conduct of business, powers & privileges and issues arising out of these.
Connects to the syllabus by examining the powers and privileges of the Indian Parliament and the process of expulsion of a member.
Potential question types: Statement-based MCQs, analytical questions on the balance between parliamentary privileges and accountability.
Visual Insights
Key Events and Accusations
Highlights of the news event, including the call for expulsion and accusations related to the trade deal.
- Call for Rahul Gandhi's Expulsion
- Expulsion Notice
- Accusation
- Compromising Energy Security and Farm Interests
Nishikant Dubey's motion seeks immediate expulsion from Lok Sabha.
Rahul Gandhi accuses the government of compromising India's energy security and farm interests through the trade deal with the US.
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the key facts related to Rahul Gandhi and the trade deal issue that are important for UPSC Prelims?
For UPSC Prelims, focus on these key facts: Rahul Gandhi's criticism of the trade deal with the US, the accusations of compromising India's energy security and farmer interests, and the move by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey seeking Rahul Gandhi's expulsion from Lok Sabha.
Exam Tip
Remember the key personalities involved: Rahul Gandhi and Nishikant Dubey.
2. What is the constitutional basis for the expulsion of a Member of Parliament in India?
Article 105 of the Constitution deals with the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. While the topic data doesn't explicitly detail the expulsion process, it is related to parliamentary privileges and ethical conduct, which fall under the purview of Article 105 and the Ethics Committee of Parliament.
Exam Tip
Focus on Article 105 and the role of the Ethics Committee.
3. Why is the issue of India-US trade relations important in the context of this news?
The news highlights concerns raised by Rahul Gandhi regarding a trade deal with the US, specifically its potential impact on India's energy security and the interests of farmers. Understanding the nuances of India-US trade relations is crucial for assessing the validity and implications of these concerns.
4. What are parliamentary privileges, and why are they important?
Parliamentary privileges are special rights and immunities enjoyed by members of parliament, individually and collectively, so that they can effectively carry out their duties without obstruction or fear of legal repercussions for actions taken during parliamentary proceedings. These privileges are essential for maintaining the independence and integrity of the legislature.
- •Ensures freedom of speech and expression in Parliament.
- •Protects members from legal action for statements made in Parliament.
- •Gives Parliament the power to punish those who breach its privileges.
5. What are the potential implications of Rahul Gandhi's expulsion from Lok Sabha on Indian politics?
Rahul Gandhi's expulsion could further polarize the political landscape, potentially leading to increased protests and unrest. It could also affect the opposition's ability to effectively challenge the government's policies and actions within the Parliament.
6. Why is Rahul Gandhi's criticism of the trade deal and the call for his expulsion in the news recently?
This issue is in the news due to the substantive motion moved by a BJP MP seeking Rahul Gandhi's expulsion following his criticism of the Prime Minister and the government over a trade deal with the US. This raises questions about freedom of speech in Parliament and the limits of dissent.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the powers and privileges of the Indian Parliament: 1. Article 105 of the Constitution explicitly defines all the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. 2. Until Parliament enacts a law defining its privileges, the privileges of the British House of Commons as they existed in 1950 continue to apply. 3. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha has the sole authority to decide on questions of breach of privilege. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.2 only
- D.1, 2, and 3
Show Answer
Answer: C
Statement 1 is INCORRECT: Article 105 does not explicitly define ALL powers and privileges. It provides a framework, but many privileges are derived from conventions and precedents. Statement 2 is CORRECT: As per the Constitution, until Parliament enacts a law, the privileges of the British House of Commons as they existed in 1950 continue to apply. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: While the Speaker has the initial authority, the Committee of Privileges also plays a crucial role in investigating alleged breaches of privilege.
2. In the context of recent news regarding a motion for expulsion of a Member of Parliament, which of the following statements accurately describes a 'substantive motion' in parliamentary procedure?
- A.A motion that is brought forward to amend an existing law.
- B.A self-contained proposal submitted for the approval of the House and drafted in such a way as to be capable of expressing a decision of the House.
- C.A motion that is used to postpone discussion on a bill.
- D.A motion that is moved to censure a minister.
Show Answer
Answer: B
A substantive motion is a self-contained proposal submitted for the approval of the House and drafted in such a way as to be capable of expressing a decision of the House. It is an independent motion, not dependent on other motions or procedures. Options A, C, and D describe other types of motions used in parliamentary procedure.
3. Which of the following situations could potentially lead to a Member of Parliament facing a motion for expulsion? 1. Disrupting parliamentary proceedings persistently. 2. Being convicted of a criminal offense. 3. Disclosing confidential parliamentary information to the public. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2, and 3
Show Answer
Answer: D
All three situations can potentially lead to a motion for expulsion. Disrupting proceedings, criminal conviction, and disclosing confidential information are all considered breaches of parliamentary privilege or conduct unbecoming of a member.
Source Articles
"What is India Giving Up?": Sanjaya Baru Raises Alarm Over PM Modi’s $500-Billion US Trade Deal in Sharp Critique
Rahul Gandhi alleges PM Modi signed ‘one-sided’ US trade deal | India News - The Indian Express
UPSC Issue at a Glance | India-US Interim Trade Deal: Backdrop, key highlights, gains, and concerns
India-US Trade Deal After Rocky Talks: The flip-flops, political pitfalls, trade negotiations explained
India US trade deal explained: The US revisions to the trade deal factsheet, and how they affect India
