Reforming Civil Service: Beyond File Disposal, Emphasizing Public Service
Re-evaluating civil service performance metrics to prioritize public service over mere file disposal efficiency.
Photo by Pyx Photography
Editorial Analysis
The current evaluation system for civil servants is flawed, as it overemphasizes file disposal at the expense of other crucial aspects of public service. A more holistic and comprehensive scorecard is needed to accurately assess civil servants' contributions to the public good.
Main Arguments:
- Current evaluation system focuses excessively on the number of files disposed of.
- This narrow focus neglects other important aspects of public service, such as policy implementation and citizen satisfaction.
- A comprehensive scorecard should include factors like ethical conduct, responsiveness to citizen needs, and innovation.
- The primary role of the civil service is to serve the public good, which extends beyond simply clearing files.
Conclusion
Policy Implications
The article critiques the current evaluation system for civil servants, arguing that it overly focuses on the number of files disposed of, neglecting the broader aspects of public service. It suggests that a more comprehensive scorecard is needed, one that includes factors such as policy implementation, citizen satisfaction, and ethical conduct.
The author emphasizes that the civil service's primary role is to serve the public good, which goes beyond simply clearing files. The piece calls for reforms in the evaluation process to better reflect the diverse responsibilities and contributions of civil servants.
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper 2: Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International relations
Ethical considerations in public service, reforms in governance
Statement-based MCQs on civil service reforms and constitutional provisions
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the evaluation of civil servants in India: 1. The current evaluation system primarily focuses on the number of files disposed of by the civil servant. 2. A comprehensive scorecard for evaluation should include policy implementation and citizen satisfaction. 3. Ethical conduct is not a relevant factor in the evaluation of civil servants. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: A
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The article explicitly critiques the current evaluation system for civil servants, stating that it overly focuses on the number of files disposed of. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The article suggests that a more comprehensive scorecard is needed, including factors such as policy implementation and citizen satisfaction. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: The article emphasizes the importance of ethical conduct in public service and implies that it should be a factor in evaluation. Therefore, only statements 1 and 2 are correct.
Source Articles
Civil Services were not built only for file disposal. Government’s ‘scorecards’ forget that | The Indian Express
A report card for civil servants is a good idea | The Indian Express
Knowledge Nugget | 'Administrative scorecards' to Secretaries: What are the must-know initiatives for civil services efficiency
Exclusive: From file disposal to output, Union Secretaries now get a report card each
UPSC postpones Civil Services 2026 notice due to ‘administrative reasons’ | Education News - The Indian Express
