16th Finance Commission Report: States' Share and Key Recommendations
Analysis of the 16th Finance Commission's report and its implications for states.
Photo by rupixen
Background Context
Why It Matters Now
The recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission are crucial for ensuring balanced fiscal relations between the Centre and the States. This directly impacts the States' ability to fund essential services and development projects.
The Commission's decisions on vertical and horizontal devolution determine the allocation of resources, influencing economic growth and social equity across the country. The inclusion of a new criterion, State's contribution to GDP, reflects a focus on efficiency and growth.
The Commission's observations regarding subsidies, power sector reforms, and fiscal deficits highlight the need for responsible fiscal management by both the Centre and the States. Public sector enterprise reforms are also emphasized for improved economic performance.
Key Takeaways
- •The 16th Finance Commission has submitted its report for the period 2026-31.
- •The Commission recommended maintaining the vertical devolution to States at 41%.
- •The Commission rejected demands to include cess and surcharge in the divisible pool.
- •A new criterion of State’s contribution to GDP has been added for horizontal devolution.
- •The Commission emphasized the need for efficient subsidies, power sector reforms, and fiscal discipline by States.
- •The Centre and States should undertake various public sector enterprise reforms.
- •The Commission's approach aims for gradual changes in States' shares and recognition of efficiency.
Different Perspectives
- •Some states, particularly industrialized ones, favored greater weightage for their contribution to GDP.
- •Other states prioritized equity parameters like income gap and population.
- •The Centre likely preferred retaining a larger share of tax revenues to meet its defense and infrastructure needs.
The 16th Finance Commission, chaired by Dr. Arvind Panagariya, has submitted its report for 2026-31, accepted by the Central government regarding fund devolution to States. The Constitution's Article 270 outlines the distribution of net tax proceeds between the Centre and States, including corporation tax, personal income tax, CGST, and IGST.
Recommendations include maintaining the vertical devolution at 41%, rejecting demands to include cess and surcharge in the divisible pool. For horizontal devolution, a new criterion of State's contribution to GDP has been added, balancing equity and efficiency. Southern and western States' shares have slightly increased, while those of large northern and central States have marginally decreased.
The FC suggests the Centre reduce reliance on cess and surcharge, and States improve subsidy efficiency and power sector reforms.
Key Facts
The 16th Finance Commission is chaired by Dr. Arvind Panagariya.
The Commission's report covers the period 2026-31.
The Constitution in Article 270 provides for the distribution of net tax proceeds between the Centre and the States.
The taxes shared include corporation tax, personal income tax, CGST, and IGST.
The divisible pool does not include cess and surcharge levied by the Centre.
The Commission recommended retaining the States’ share in vertical devolution at 41%.
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper II: Functions and responsibilities of the Union and the States, issues and challenges pertaining to the federal structure, devolution of powers and finances up to local levels and challenges therein.
Connects to the syllabus by addressing fiscal federalism, resource allocation, and constitutional provisions.
Potential question types include statement-based questions on the recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission and analytical questions on the challenges of fiscal federalism in India.
Visual Insights
Key Recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission
Highlights from the 16th Finance Commission's report for 2026-31.
- Vertical Devolution to States
- 41%
Maintained at 41% as per the 15th Finance Commission.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the period covered by the 16th Finance Commission's report, and who chairs the commission?
The 16th Finance Commission's report covers the period 2026-31. The commission is chaired by Dr. Arvind Panagariya.
2. Explain Article 270 of the Constitution and its relevance to the 16th Finance Commission.
Article 270 of the Constitution provides for the distribution of net tax proceeds between the Centre and the States. This includes taxes like corporation tax, personal income tax, CGST, and IGST, which are central to the Finance Commission's recommendations on fund devolution.
3. What is meant by 'vertical devolution' in the context of the Finance Commission, and what percentage has been recommended by the 16th Finance Commission?
Vertical devolution refers to the sharing of tax revenue between the Union (Centre) and the States. The 16th Finance Commission has recommended maintaining the vertical devolution at 41%.
4. What is the 'divisible pool' of taxes, and what is excluded from it according to the 16th Finance Commission's report?
The 'divisible pool' refers to the net tax proceeds that are distributed between the Centre and the States. According to the report, cess and surcharge levied by the Centre are excluded from the divisible pool.
5. What are the key recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission regarding the inclusion of cess and surcharge in the divisible pool?
The 16th Finance Commission rejected demands to include cess and surcharge in the divisible pool.
6. What is the new criterion added for horizontal devolution by the 16th Finance Commission, and what is its purpose?
A new criterion of State's contribution to GDP has been added for horizontal devolution, balancing equity and efficiency.
7. How have the shares of Southern and Western States changed based on the 16th Finance Commission's recommendations, and what about large Northern and Central States?
Southern and western States' shares have slightly increased, while those of large northern and central States have marginally decreased.
8. What are the potential implications of the 16th Finance Commission's recommendations on the fiscal autonomy of States?
The recommendations impact the funds available to states, influencing their ability to finance development projects and social welfare schemes. The balance between vertical and horizontal devolution is crucial for maintaining fiscal autonomy.
9. Why is the 16th Finance Commission report in the news recently?
The 16th Finance Commission's report is in the news because it has been submitted to the Central government and accepted regarding fund devolution to States for the period 2026-31.
10. What are the pros and cons of maintaining the vertical devolution at 41%?
Maintaining vertical devolution at 41% provides stability for states' finances. However, some states demanded a higher share, so this decision might lead to dissatisfaction among those states.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the 16th Finance Commission: 1. The Commission's report covers the period from 2026-31. 2. The vertical devolution to States has been maintained at 41%. 3. The Commission has recommended including cess and surcharge in the divisible pool. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: A
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The 16th Finance Commission's report covers the period from 2026-31, as explicitly stated in the summary. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The vertical devolution to States has been maintained at 41%, according to the summary. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: The Commission rejected demands to include cess and surcharge in the divisible pool, as mentioned in the summary. Therefore, only statements 1 and 2 are correct.
2. Which of the following taxes are part of the divisible pool as per Article 270 of the Constitution of India? 1. Corporation Tax 2. Personal Income Tax 3. Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) 4. Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2, 3 and 4 only
- C.1, 3 and 4 only
- D.1, 2, 3 and 4
Show Answer
Answer: D
Article 270 of the Constitution of India outlines the distribution of net tax proceeds between the Centre and States. According to the summary, the divisible pool includes corporation tax, personal income tax, CGST, and IGST. Therefore, all the given options are part of the divisible pool.
3. With reference to the recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission, consider the following statements: 1. A new criterion of State's contribution to GDP has been added for horizontal devolution. 2. The Commission suggested the Centre increase reliance on cess and surcharge. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 only
- B.2 only
- C.Both 1 and 2
- D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show Answer
Answer: A
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The summary explicitly mentions that a new criterion of State's contribution to GDP has been added for horizontal devolution. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: The Commission suggested the Centre reduce reliance on cess and surcharge, not increase it.
Source Articles
Union Budget 2026: 16th Finance Commission recommends 41% tax devolution to States, increased share to South India - The Hindu
16th Finance Commission identifies Tamil Nadu as one of top three States suffering heavy losses of public sector enterprises - The Hindu
Budget 2026 disappoints Kerala; 16th Finance Commission raises State’s tax share - The Hindu
A cautious nudge: On the 16th Finance Commission’s recommendations - The Hindu
Have States gained from the 16th FC? | Explained - The Hindu