For this article:

9 Feb 2026·Source: The Hindu
4 min
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesPolity & GovernanceNEWS

Amit Shah: India Will Soon Be Free From Naxalism

Union Minister Amit Shah says India will soon be free from Naxalism.

Union Minister Amit Shah stated that India will soon be free from Naxalism. He made this statement after chairing a high-level security review meeting in Raipur. The statement indicates the government's confidence in its efforts to combat Naxalism and its commitment to ensuring security in affected regions. Further details about the security review meeting and specific strategies were not provided in this excerpt.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper III: Internal Security - Linkage between development and spread of extremism.

2.

GS Paper II: Governance - Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors.

3.

Potential question types: Analytical questions on the causes and consequences of Naxalism, and the effectiveness of government strategies.

More Information

Background

The term Naxalism originates from the village of Naxalbari in West Bengal, where a violent peasant uprising took place in 1967. This movement was sparked by local tribals protesting against land exploitation and injustice. The initial Naxalite ideology was rooted in Maoist principles, advocating for armed struggle to overthrow the existing socio-economic and political structures. Over the decades, Naxalism spread to various parts of India, particularly in areas with significant tribal populations and socio-economic disparities. The movement has seen different phases, marked by periods of intense violence, government crackdowns, and attempts at negotiation. Key events include the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004, which consolidated various Naxalite groups under a unified command. The government has responded with a multi-pronged approach, combining security operations with development initiatives aimed at addressing the root causes of Naxalism. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, also known as the Forest Rights Act, aimed to grant land rights to tribal communities, addressing a key grievance exploited by Naxal groups. The legal and constitutional framework for addressing Naxalism involves a combination of central and state government actions. The Indian Constitution empowers the state governments to maintain law and order, while the central government provides support through paramilitary forces and financial assistance. Various laws, such as the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), have been used to counter Naxal activities. The Supreme Court has also played a role in shaping the legal landscape, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that respects human rights while combating extremism.

Latest Developments

In recent years, the government has intensified its efforts to combat Naxalism through a combination of security operations and development initiatives. The Ministry of Home Affairs has been closely monitoring the situation and coordinating efforts between different states. Initiatives like the Special Infrastructure Scheme aim to improve infrastructure in Naxal-affected areas, providing better connectivity and access to essential services. There are ongoing debates about the effectiveness of different strategies in addressing Naxalism. Some argue for a more aggressive security approach, while others emphasize the need for addressing the socio-economic grievances of tribal communities. Institutions like NITI Aayog have been involved in formulating development strategies for Naxal-affected areas, focusing on improving education, healthcare, and livelihood opportunities. Civil society organizations also play a crucial role in advocating for the rights of tribal communities and promoting peaceful resolution of conflicts. Looking ahead, the government aims to further reduce the influence of Naxalism through targeted interventions and improved governance. Key milestones include increasing the presence of security forces in affected areas and strengthening local governance structures. Challenges remain, including the need to address the root causes of Naxalism and ensure that development benefits reach the most vulnerable communities. The success of these efforts will depend on a coordinated approach involving the central and state governments, security forces, civil society organizations, and local communities.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is Naxalism and why is it important for UPSC aspirants to understand it?

Naxalism, also known as Left Wing Extremism (LWE), originated from a peasant uprising in Naxalbari, West Bengal, in 1967. It's rooted in Maoist ideology, advocating for armed struggle against socio-economic inequalities. Understanding Naxalism is crucial for UPSC aspirants as it relates to internal security, governance, and development challenges, frequently appearing in Mains GS Paper III and the interview.

2. What are the key areas affected by Naxalism in India, and how does this relate to Article 244 and the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the Constitution?

Naxalism primarily affects states with significant tribal populations and resource-rich areas. Article 244 and the Fifth and Sixth Schedules deal with the administration of Scheduled and Tribal Areas. The connection lies in the fact that Naxalism often finds support among marginalized tribal communities who feel alienated due to lack of development and exploitation of resources in these areas.

3. According to Amit Shah's statement, India will soon be free from Naxalism. What government initiatives are currently in place to achieve this?

As per the topic data, the government is intensifying efforts through security operations and development initiatives. The Ministry of Home Affairs is monitoring the situation and coordinating efforts between states. Initiatives like the Special Infrastructure Scheme aim to improve infrastructure in affected areas.

4. What is the 'Development-Security Nexus' in the context of Naxalism, and how is it relevant to addressing the issue?

The 'Development-Security Nexus' recognizes that development and security are intertwined. In the context of Naxalism, it means that addressing socio-economic grievances through development initiatives is crucial for long-term security and stability. Simply focusing on security operations without addressing the root causes of discontent is unlikely to be effective.

5. What are the potential challenges in completely eradicating Naxalism, despite the government's efforts?

Potential challenges include: continued socio-economic disparities in affected regions, difficulties in ensuring effective implementation of development schemes, the presence of strong ideological motivations among some Naxalites, and the complex terrain that provides them with safe havens. Overcoming these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach.

6. What are the key facts about the origin of Naxalism that are important for the Prelims exam?

The term Naxalism originates from Naxalbari village in West Bengal, where a peasant uprising occurred in 1967. The movement was sparked by local tribals protesting against land exploitation and injustice. The initial Naxalite ideology was rooted in Maoist principles, advocating armed struggle.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA): 1. It was enacted in 1967 to prevent unlawful activities associations in India. 2. Under UAPA, both Indian and foreign nationals can be charged. 3. The Act has been amended several times, including in 2019, to broaden its scope. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: D

All three statements are correct. Statement 1 is CORRECT: The UAPA was indeed enacted in 1967 to prevent unlawful activities associations in India. Statement 2 is CORRECT: Under UAPA, both Indian and foreign nationals can be charged for unlawful activities. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The Act has been amended several times, including in 2019, to broaden its scope and make it more stringent.

2. Which of the following is NOT a stated objective of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006?

  • A.To recognize and vest the forest rights and occupation in forest land in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers.
  • B.To provide a framework for sustainable use of forest resources.
  • C.To promote commercial logging activities in forest areas.
  • D.To strengthen the conservation regime of the forests while ensuring livelihood and food security of the forest dwelling communities.
Show Answer

Answer: C

Option C is the correct answer. The Forest Rights Act aims to protect the rights of forest dwellers and promote sustainable use of forest resources, not to promote commercial logging activities. The Act recognizes the rights of forest-dwelling communities to manage and conserve forest resources, ensuring their livelihood and food security.

3. Assertion (A): Union Minister Amit Shah stated that India will soon be free from Naxalism. Reason (R): The government has adopted a multi-pronged approach, combining security operations with development initiatives, to address the root causes of Naxalism. In the context of the above statements, which of the following is correct?

  • A.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
  • B.Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.
  • C.A is true, but R is false.
  • D.A is false, but R is true.
Show Answer

Answer: A

Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A. Amit Shah's statement reflects the government's confidence in its efforts to combat Naxalism. The multi-pronged approach, combining security operations with development initiatives, is indeed the strategy being used to address the root causes of Naxalism and ultimately eliminate it.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News