Rajya Sabha Passes Motion of Thanks Amid Opposition Walkout
Rajya Sabha adopts Motion of Thanks after Opposition walks out in protest.
The Rajya Sabha adopted the Motion of Thanks for President Droupadi Murmu's address after the Opposition walked out. Amendments proposed by Opposition MPs were defeated. BJP members addressed concerns about the India-U.S.
trade deal, stating it was in the country's interest. Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi claimed even External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was unaware of the deal's details.
BJP MP Maya Naroliya highlighted increased allocation to agriculture under the PM-Kisan scheme. AAP MP Sandeep Kumar Pathak criticized the rushed special revision of voter lists.
Key Facts
The Rajya Sabha adopted the Motion to Thank President Droupadi Murmu for her Address to the joint session of Parliament.
Amendments moved by Opposition MPs were defeated in a voice vote in their absence.
The Opposition had walked out of the House during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s reply to the debate.
BJP members addressed concerns about the India-U.S. bilateral trade deal, stating it was in the country's interest.
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi claimed even External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was unaware of the details of the trade deal.
BJP MP Maya Naroliya said under the Narendra Modi government, the allocation to agriculture sector had increased, helping the farmers to modernise farming systems.
Under the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-Kisan) alone, ₹4 lakh crore was distributed to farmers.
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper 2 - Polity and Governance: Parliamentary procedures, government policies and interventions
GS Paper 3 - Economy: Agricultural schemes, trade agreements
Potential for questions on parliamentary procedures, agricultural policies, and international relations
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the Motion of Thanks and why is it important?
The Motion of Thanks is a formal way for Parliament to thank the President for addressing both Houses. It is important because it provides an opportunity for the opposition to scrutinize the government's policies and performance. The President's address outlines the government's policies and achievements of the past year and the agenda for the coming year.
2. What are the key facts about the recent Motion of Thanks for UPSC Prelims?
For UPSC Prelims, remember that the Rajya Sabha adopted the Motion of Thanks after the Opposition walked out. Amendments proposed by Opposition MPs were defeated. The debate also included discussion on the India-U.S. trade deal and the PM-Kisan scheme.
3. Why did the Opposition walk out during the Motion of Thanks debate?
As per the topic data, the Opposition walked out of the House during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s reply to the debate, indicating their dissatisfaction with the government's policies. The defeat of their proposed amendments further reflects this dissent.
4. What are the concerns surrounding the India-U.S. trade deal as discussed during the Motion of Thanks?
Concerns were raised about the details of the India-U.S. trade deal. Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi claimed that even the External Affairs Minister was unaware of the deal's specifics. BJP members, however, stated that the deal was in the country's interest.
5. How does the adoption of the Motion of Thanks impact common citizens?
The Motion of Thanks reflects the government's agenda and priorities. The debates surrounding it, such as those on the India-U.S. trade deal and schemes like PM-Kisan, can indirectly impact citizens through policy changes and resource allocation. The opposition's concerns also highlight areas where the government's actions may face scrutiny and potential reform.
6. What is the significance of the ₹4 lakh crore figure mentioned in relation to the PM-Kisan scheme?
The ₹4 lakh crore figure represents the amount distributed to farmers under the PM-Kisan scheme. This figure can be used to highlight the scale of government support to the agricultural sector. For the exam, remember this figure as a key indicator of government spending on farmer welfare.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the Motion of Thanks: 1. It is a formal way for Parliament to thank the President for their address. 2. Amendments to the Motion of Thanks can be moved by members of the ruling party only. 3. The Motion of Thanks is voted on by both Houses of Parliament. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: C
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The Motion of Thanks is indeed a formal way for Parliament to thank the President for addressing both Houses, outlining the government's policies and agenda. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: Amendments to the Motion of Thanks can be moved by ANY member of Parliament, including those from the opposition, to express their disagreement or propose changes. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The Motion of Thanks is voted on by both Houses of Parliament after a debate. If the motion fails to pass, it indicates a lack of confidence in the government.
2. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the PM-Kisan scheme?
- A.It provides ₹12,000 per year to all farmers, irrespective of landholding size.
- B.It is solely funded and implemented by state governments.
- C.It provides ₹6,000 per year to small and marginal farmers in three equal installments.
- D.The scheme was launched in 2014 with the aim of doubling farmers' income by 2022.
Show Answer
Answer: C
Option C is CORRECT: The PM-Kisan scheme provides ₹6,000 per year to small and marginal farmers (those owning up to 2 hectares of land) in three equal installments of ₹2,000 each. Option A is INCORRECT: The scheme provides ₹6,000, not ₹12,000. Option B is INCORRECT: It is a central government scheme. Option D is INCORRECT: The scheme was launched in 2019, not 2014.
3. Assertion (A): The Rajya Sabha is a permanent body and is not subject to dissolution. Reason (R): One-third of the members of the Rajya Sabha retire every two years, ensuring continuity. In the context of the above statements, which of the following is correct?
- A.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- B.Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.
- C.A is true, but R is false.
- D.A is false, but R is true.
Show Answer
Answer: A
Both the assertion and the reason are true. The Rajya Sabha is indeed a permanent body, meaning it cannot be dissolved like the Lok Sabha. The reason provided, that one-third of its members retire every two years, is the mechanism that ensures this continuity. Therefore, the reason correctly explains why the assertion is true.
Source Articles
Rajya Sabha adopts Motion to Thank President, Opposition raises questions on U.S. trade deal - The Hindu
Parliament Budget Session Day 6 highlights: Lok Sabha adjourned amid uproar; Kamal Haasan makes maiden speech in RS - The Hindu
Parliament budget session: Lot of time being spent fixing Congress' mistakes, says PM Modi - The Hindu
Parliament Budget Session Day 5 Highlights: Eight Opposition Lok Sabha MPs suspended for 'creating ruckus' - The Hindu
Will not be able to ‘dig my grave’, poor are with me: PM to Opposition - The Hindu