Manipur BJP legislators, alliance partners convene in Delhi for meeting
Manipur BJP MLAs and alliance partners meet in Delhi amid political uncertainty.
Photo by WAIKHOM JAMES
Legislators from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its alliance partners in Manipur have been summoned to Delhi for a crucial meeting today. MLAs from both the Kuki-Zo and Meitei communities are traveling to Delhi. Sambit Patra, BJP in-charge for Manipur, contacted the MLAs to ensure their presence.
Former Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh is also attending. Manipur BJP president Adhikarimayum Sharda Devi hopes a popular government will be formed.
The alliance partners, National People’s Party (NPP) and Naga People’s Front (NPF), are expected to participate. Security forces in Manipur are preparing for potential law and order issues. President’s Rule in Manipur will complete a year on February 13.
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has been exploring the possibility of restoring a popular government. The Manipur Assembly has been under suspended animation since Mr. Singh’s resignation.
President’s Rule was extended on August 19, 2025, after parliamentary approval. Talks are ongoing with Meitei, Kuki-Zo, and Naga MLAs to form a government with representation from all communities. The Kuki Zo Council opposes MLAs joining the government until their demand for a separate administration is met.
Key Facts
BJP MLAs, alliance partners: Called to Delhi for meeting
President's Rule in Manipur: Completes year on February 13
MHA exploring: Restoration of popular government
Kuki Zo Council opposes: Joining government
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper II: Polity and Governance - Constitutional provisions, functions and responsibilities of the Union and the States
Analyzing the imposition and revocation of President's Rule in various states
Statement-based questions on constitutional articles and landmark judgments
Visual Insights
Manipur: Location of Political Activity
Map showing Manipur and Delhi, the locations of key political meetings related to the state government formation.
Loading interactive map...
Timeline of Political Events in Manipur (2021-2026)
Timeline showing key events leading to the current political situation in Manipur, including the imposition and extension of President's Rule.
Political instability and ethnic tensions have historically affected governance in Manipur.
- 2021Political stability in Manipur
- 2022Assembly elections in Manipur
- 2024N. Biren Singh becomes Chief Minister
- 2025President's Rule imposed in Manipur after Mr. Singh’s resignation
- 2025President’s Rule extended on August 19
- 2026Manipur BJP legislators and alliance partners convene in Delhi for meeting
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is actively involved in exploring options for restoring a popular government in Manipur. This involves continuous dialogue with various stakeholders, including MLAs from different communities. The focus is on creating a stable and representative government that can address the ongoing challenges in the state.
Recent developments indicate a cautious approach towards lifting President's Rule. The concerns of all communities, particularly the Kuki-Zo Council's demand for a separate administration, are being taken into consideration. The government aims to ensure that any new arrangement has broad consensus and support.
Looking ahead, the formation of a popular government in Manipur will depend on successful negotiations and confidence-building measures. The MHA is likely to play a crucial role in facilitating these discussions and ensuring a smooth transition. The upcoming months will be critical in determining the future political landscape of the state.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why is the meeting of Manipur BJP legislators and alliance partners in Delhi significant for UPSC aspirants?
This meeting is significant because it highlights the ongoing political situation in Manipur, especially concerning the possibility of lifting President's Rule and forming a popular government. Understanding the dynamics between the BJP, its alliance partners (NPP and NPF), and the Kuki-Zo and Meitei communities is crucial for Polity & Governance related questions in UPSC.
2. What key facts about the Manipur political situation should I remember for the Prelims exam?
For the Prelims exam, remember these key facts: President's Rule in Manipur completes a year on February 13. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is exploring the restoration of a popular government. Key personalities involved include Sambit Patra, N. Biren Singh, and Adhikarimayum Sharda Devi. Also, be aware that the Kuki Zo Council opposes joining the government.
Exam Tip
Focus on dates related to President's Rule and the names of key political figures involved.
3. Explain the concept of 'President's Rule' in the context of Manipur's current situation.
President's Rule, under Article 356, allows the central government to take control of a state's administration if the constitutional machinery breaks down. In Manipur, it signifies that the elected state government was suspended due to instability, and the central government assumed direct control through the Governor. The MHA is now exploring options to restore a popular government.
4. How does the potential restoration of a 'popular government' impact the common citizens of Manipur?
The restoration of a popular government aims to bring stability and address the grievances of the people. A representative government is expected to be more responsive to local needs, potentially leading to improved governance, development, and resolution of conflicts between different communities. However, the effectiveness depends on the stability and inclusiveness of the new government.
5. What is the historical background to President's Rule in India, relevant to the Manipur context?
The concept of President's Rule originates from the Government of India Act, 1935, which allowed the Governor-General to intervene in provincial matters. Article 356 of the Constitution formalizes this provision, allowing the central government to take control of a state's administration under specific circumstances. Understanding this historical context provides a deeper understanding of the Centre-State relations and the application of emergency provisions.
6. What are the implications of the Kuki-Zo Council opposing joining the government in Manipur?
The Kuki-Zo Council's opposition indicates potential challenges in forming a stable and inclusive government. It suggests that the grievances and demands of the Kuki-Zo community may not be adequately addressed in the proposed power-sharing arrangement. This could lead to continued instability and hinder efforts to restore normalcy in the state.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding President's Rule in India: 1. President's Rule can be imposed in a state under Article 356 of the Constitution if the constitutional machinery breaks down. 2. The Manipur Assembly has been under suspended animation since N. Biren Singh's resignation, as mentioned in the news. 3. President's Rule was extended in Manipur on August 19, 2025, after parliamentary approval. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: D
Statement 1 is CORRECT: Article 356 of the Constitution allows the imposition of President's Rule in a state if the constitutional machinery breaks down. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The news explicitly mentions that the Manipur Assembly has been under suspended animation since Mr. Singh’s resignation. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The news states that President’s Rule was extended on August 19, 2025, after parliamentary approval.
2. In the context of the ongoing situation in Manipur, consider the following statements: 1. The Kuki-Zo Council supports MLAs joining the government even before their demand for a separate administration is met. 2. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is exploring the possibility of restoring a popular government in Manipur. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 only
- B.2 only
- C.Both 1 and 2
- D.Neither 1 nor 2
Show Answer
Answer: B
Statement 1 is INCORRECT: The Kuki Zo Council opposes MLAs joining the government until their demand for a separate administration is met, as stated in the news. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The news mentions that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has been exploring the possibility of restoring a popular government.
3. Which of the following statements accurately reflects the S.R. Bommai case (1994) in relation to Article 356?
- A.It expanded the scope of the President's power to dismiss state governments without judicial review.
- B.It established guidelines to prevent the misuse of Article 356 and subjected the President's power to judicial review.
- C.It removed the requirement for parliamentary approval before imposing President's Rule.
- D.It mandated the dissolution of the state assembly immediately upon the imposition of President's Rule.
Show Answer
Answer: B
The S.R. Bommai case (1994) was a landmark judgment where the Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent the misuse of Article 356. This case emphasized that the President's power is not absolute and is subject to judicial review. The court also highlighted that the state assembly should not be dissolved until Parliament approves the proclamation.