Budget 2026: ₹500 Cr Boost for Sports Goods Manufacturing
₹500 crore allocated to boost sports goods manufacturing in India.
Photo by Braden Collum
The sports goods manufacturing sector received a first-time allocation of ₹500 crore in the Union Budget. The allocation for the Youth Affairs and Sports Ministry was raised by over ₹1,000 crore. The overall Budget allocation for the Ministry was ₹4,479.88 crore, an increase of ₹1,133.34 crore from the revised allocation of ₹3,346.54 crore for 2025-26.
The allocation for the Sports Authority of India (SAI) was enhanced from ₹880 crore to ₹917.38 crore. The government's flagship Khelo India programme received an allocation of ₹924.35 crore.
Key Facts
Sports goods manufacturing allocation: ₹500 crore
Youth Affairs and Sports Ministry allocation: ₹4,479.88 crore
SAI allocation: ₹917.38 crore
Khelo India allocation: ₹924.35 crore
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper 3: Economy - Government Budgeting, Industrial Policy
Connects to government schemes for promoting manufacturing and sports development
Potential question types: Statement-based, analytical questions on the impact of the budget allocation
Visual Insights
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the key facts from the Budget 2026 related to sports that are important for the UPSC Prelims exam?
For the UPSC Prelims, remember these key figures: ₹500 crore allocated for sports goods manufacturing, ₹4,479.88 crore for the Youth Affairs and Sports Ministry, ₹917.38 crore for the Sports Authority of India (SAI), and ₹924.35 crore for the Khelo India programme.
Exam Tip
Focus on memorizing the numerical allocations as these are frequently tested in the Prelims.
2. Why is the ₹500 crore allocation to boost sports goods manufacturing significant?
This allocation is significant because it's the first time the sports goods manufacturing sector has received a specific boost in the Union Budget. It addresses the growing demand for quality sports equipment due to increasing disposable incomes and health awareness, potentially transforming India into a sports manufacturing hub.
3. What are the recent developments in the sports sector highlighted by the budget allocation?
The increased budget allocation indicates a stronger government focus on promoting sports at the grassroots level through programs like Khelo India. It also shows a commitment to improving sports infrastructure and supporting athletes through enhanced funding for the Sports Authority of India (SAI).
4. How might the increased budget for sports impact the common citizen?
The increased budget could lead to better sports facilities at the community level, increased participation in sports, and improved health outcomes for citizens. It can also create more job opportunities in the sports goods manufacturing sector and related industries.
5. What is the historical background of sports goods manufacturing in India?
The sports goods industry in India, particularly in Jalandhar, began during the British Raj, initially catering to the needs of the British army and educational institutions. Over time, it expanded to serve the domestic market and eventually started exporting its products.
6. What are the important allocations to remember for the Mains exam?
For the Mains exam, remember the overall increase in the Youth Affairs and Sports Ministry allocation (₹4,479.88 crore) and the specific allocation for sports goods manufacturing (₹500 crore). These figures can be used to illustrate the government's commitment to the sports sector.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the recent budget allocation for the sports sector: 1. The Union Budget 2026 allocated ₹500 crore for the first time specifically for sports goods manufacturing. 2. The overall budget allocation for the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports increased by more than ₹1,000 crore. 3. The allocation for the Sports Authority of India (SAI) was enhanced to ₹950 crore. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: A
Statement 1 is CORRECT: The Union Budget 2026 allocated ₹500 crore for the first time specifically for sports goods manufacturing. Statement 2 is CORRECT: The overall budget allocation for the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports increased by more than ₹1,000 crore, specifically by ₹1,133.34 crore. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: The allocation for the Sports Authority of India (SAI) was enhanced to ₹917.38 crore, not ₹950 crore.
2. Which of the following statements is NOT correct regarding the Khelo India programme?
- A.It is a flagship programme for the development of sports at the grassroots level.
- B.It aims to promote sports as a viable career option.
- C.It received an allocation of ₹924.35 crore in the Union Budget 2026.
- D.It focuses exclusively on promoting indigenous sports.
Show Answer
Answer: D
Option D is NOT correct. While the Khelo India programme does promote indigenous sports, it is not exclusively focused on them. It encompasses a wide range of sports disciplines to promote overall sports development in the country. The programme received an allocation of ₹924.35 crore in the Union Budget 2026 and aims to develop sports at the grassroots level and promote sports as a viable career option.
3. Which of the following is the primary objective of allocating ₹500 crore for sports goods manufacturing in the Union Budget 2026?
- A.To import high-quality sports equipment from foreign countries.
- B.To promote domestic production and enhance the competitiveness of the Indian sports goods industry.
- C.To provide financial assistance to athletes.
- D.To organize international sports events in India.
Show Answer
Answer: B
The primary objective of allocating ₹500 crore for sports goods manufacturing is to promote domestic production and enhance the competitiveness of the Indian sports goods industry. This allocation aims to boost local manufacturing, create employment opportunities, and reduce reliance on imports. While supporting athletes and organizing events are important, they are not the primary focus of this specific allocation.
