For this article:

20 Jan 2026·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
International RelationsPolity & GovernanceEDITORIAL

India's Gaza Policy: Navigating Complex Geopolitics with Caution

India must balance its Gaza policy amid shifting geopolitical dynamics.

India's Gaza Policy: Navigating Complex Geopolitics with Caution

Photo by Benjamin Smith

Editorial Analysis

India needs to navigate its Gaza policy with caution, balancing its relationships with Israel and Palestine while promoting peace.

Main Arguments:

  1. India's historical support for Palestine requires continued engagement to advocate for a peaceful resolution.
  2. India's strategic partnership with Israel necessitates careful diplomacy to avoid alienating either party.
  3. The evolving geopolitical landscape demands a nuanced approach to prevent unintended consequences.
  4. India can leverage its unique position to promote dialogue and de-escalation in the region.

Counter Arguments:

  1. Some argue that India should prioritize its relationship with Israel due to strategic and economic interests.
  2. Others believe India should maintain unwavering support for Palestine, regardless of geopolitical considerations.

Conclusion

India must adopt a balanced approach, promoting dialogue and humanitarian assistance to foster stability in Gaza.

Policy Implications

India should focus on leveraging its diplomatic influence to encourage negotiations and provide humanitarian aid to Gaza.

The article discusses the complexities of India's position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly concerning Gaza. It highlights the challenges India faces in maintaining relationships with both Israel and Palestine while advocating for a peaceful resolution. The author emphasizes the need for caution and careful consideration in India's diplomatic approach, especially given the evolving geopolitical landscape and the potential for misinterpretations or unintended consequences.

India's long-standing support for the Palestinian cause and its growing strategic partnership with Israel require a delicate balancing act. The article suggests that India should leverage its unique position to promote dialogue and de-escalation, focusing on humanitarian assistance and long-term stability in the region.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: International Relations - India's foreign policy

2.

GS Paper II: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests

3.

Potential questions on India's balancing act in the Middle East

Visual Insights

India's Diplomatic Engagement in the Middle East

Map showing India's relationships with Israel and Palestine, highlighting key cities and areas of engagement.

Loading interactive map...

📍Jerusalem📍Ramallah📍Gaza City📍New Delhi
More Information

Background

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict's roots extend deep into the late 19th and early 20th centuries, driven by competing nationalisms: Zionism, seeking a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and Palestinian Arab nationalism, asserting their claim to the same territory. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, in which the British government declared its support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, is a key historical event. The end of World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire led to British control over Palestine under a League of Nations mandate.

Increased Jewish immigration, particularly after the Holocaust, heightened tensions. The 1947 UN Partition Plan proposed dividing Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states, but it was rejected by the Arab Higher Committee. The 1948 Arab-Israeli War resulted in the establishment of the State of Israel and the displacement of a large number of Palestinians, known as the Nakba.

Latest Developments

In recent years, several developments have shaped the Israeli-Palestinian landscape. The Abraham Accords, brokered by the U.S. in 2020, normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations, bypassing the Palestinian issue.

This has altered regional dynamics and potentially weakened the traditional Arab consensus on the conflict. The internal political instability in both Israel and the Palestinian territories has further complicated matters. Repeated elections in Israel and divisions within Palestinian factions have hindered progress towards negotiations.

The expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank continues to be a major point of contention, deemed illegal under international law. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has opened an investigation into alleged war crimes in the Palestinian territories, which has been met with strong opposition from Israel and its allies. Looking ahead, the prospect of a two-state solution appears increasingly remote, with growing concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza and the potential for further escalation of violence.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Balfour Declaration of 1917: 1. It was a public statement by the British government expressing support for a 'national home for the Jewish people' in Palestine. 2. It explicitly recognized Palestine as an exclusively Jewish territory. 3. It was endorsed by all major Arab leaders at the time. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.2 only
  • C.1 and 3
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: A

Statement 1 is correct. The Balfour Declaration did express support for a Jewish national home. Statement 2 is incorrect as it did not recognize Palestine as exclusively Jewish. Statement 3 is incorrect as Arab leaders opposed the declaration.

GKSolverToday's News