For this article:

9 Jan 2026·Source: The Hindu
3 min
Polity & GovernanceEconomyPolity & GovernanceNEWS

Mamata Banerjee, ED Clash Over I-PAC Raid, Data Removal

Mamata accused of removing evidence during ED raid on I-PAC office.

Mamata Banerjee, ED Clash Over I-PAC Raid, Data Removal

Photo by R.D. Smith

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has accused West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of obstructing an investigation by removing evidence during a raid on the Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC) in Kolkata today. Banerjee visited both the I-PAC office and the residence of its co-founder Pratik Jain during the raid, claiming the search was politically motivated and aimed at stealing party data. The ED alleges that Banerjee and her aides forcibly removed physical documents and electronic evidence from both locations, obstructing the ongoing investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The agency claims the Chief Minister's actions have hindered the investigation.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: Polity and Governance - Laws, institutions, and bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of vulnerable sections.

2.

GS Paper III: Economy - Money laundering and its prevention.

3.

Potential question types: Statement-based, analytical, and factual questions on PMLA and ED's powers.

Visual Insights

Location of ED Raid in Kolkata

This map highlights Kolkata, West Bengal, where the ED raid on I-PAC took place. It provides geographic context to the news event.

Loading interactive map...

📍West Bengal
More Information

Background

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) has its roots in international efforts to combat money laundering, particularly the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations. India, as a member of FATF, enacted PMLA in 2002, which came into effect in 2005. The initial objective was to prevent and control money laundering, confiscate property derived from it, and punish offenders.

Over the years, the PMLA has been amended several times, notably in 2009, 2012, and 2019, to broaden its scope and enhance its effectiveness. These amendments have included expanding the definition of 'proceeds of crime,' empowering the Enforcement Directorate (ED) with greater investigative powers, and addressing issues related to attachment and confiscation of property. The evolution of PMLA reflects the increasing complexity of financial crimes and the need for a robust legal framework to tackle them.

Latest Developments

Recent developments concerning the PMLA include increased scrutiny of its application and potential misuse. There have been debates regarding the ED's powers of arrest and attachment of property, with concerns raised about due process and potential harassment. Court rulings have also played a significant role in shaping the interpretation and application of the PMLA.

For instance, judgments have clarified the burden of proof, the definition of 'proceeds of crime,' and the rights of accused individuals. Looking ahead, further amendments to the PMLA are possible to address emerging challenges such as cryptocurrency-related money laundering and to align the law with international standards. The judiciary's role in safeguarding individual liberties while upholding the law's objectives will remain crucial.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002: 1. It empowers the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to attach and confiscate property involved in money laundering. 2. The Act places the burden of proof on the accused to demonstrate that the property in question is not proceeds of crime. 3. Amendments to the PMLA have broadened the definition of 'proceeds of crime' to include property derived indirectly from criminal activity. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: D

All three statements are correct. PMLA empowers ED, places the burden of proof on the accused, and has broadened the definition of 'proceeds of crime'.

2. In the context of the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which of the following statements is NOT correct?

  • A.The ED is a multi-disciplinary organization mandated to investigate economic crimes and violations of foreign exchange laws.
  • B.The ED functions under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance.
  • C.The ED can initiate investigations based solely on media reports without any formal complaint.
  • D.The ED enforces the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Show Answer

Answer: C

The ED requires a formal complaint or FIR to initiate investigations, not just media reports.

3. Which of the following is the primary objective of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)?

  • A.To promote international trade and investment.
  • B.To combat money laundering and terrorist financing.
  • C.To regulate global financial markets.
  • D.To provide financial assistance to developing countries.
Show Answer

Answer: B

The FATF's primary objective is to combat money laundering and terrorist financing by setting standards and promoting effective implementation of legal, regulatory and operational measures.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News