For this article:

6 Jan 2026·Source: The Indian Express
5 min
Polity & GovernanceEconomySocial IssuesEDITORIAL

Honest Evaluation Crucial for Effective MGNREGA Implementation

Editorial emphasizes honest evaluation of MGNREGA to ensure its effectiveness and address implementation gaps.

Honest Evaluation Crucial for Effective MGNREGA Implementation

Photo by Claudio Schwarz

Editorial Analysis

The author advocates for a critical and honest assessment of MGNREGA's performance, emphasizing that a new rural employment law should be informed by a clear understanding of the existing scheme's strengths and weaknesses to avoid repeating past mistakes.

Main Arguments:

  1. Despite its vital role as a social safety net, MGNREGA suffers from significant implementation gaps, including delayed wage payments, corruption, and insufficient work availability, which undermine its effectiveness.
  2. A superficial evaluation will not address the root causes of these problems, and any new legislation built upon such an assessment risks perpetuating the same issues.
  3. The scheme's budget allocation needs to be realistic and timely to prevent payment delays, and there's a need to improve the quality of assets created and ensure greater transparency in operations.

Conclusion

The editorial concludes that for any new rural employment law to be successful, it must be based on a rigorous, honest, and data-driven evaluation of MGNREGA, focusing on improving its efficiency, transparency, and responsiveness to rural needs.

Policy Implications

The government should undertake a comprehensive, independent audit of MGNREGA, address budget shortfalls, streamline payment mechanisms, and enhance monitoring to ensure accountability and effective asset creation, informing future rural employment policies.
This editorial argues for an honest and comprehensive evaluation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) to ensure its effective implementation and address persistent challenges. It suggests that despite its potential, the scheme often falls short due to systemic issues and a lack of transparent assessment. MGNREGA, launched in 2005, is a flagship rural employment scheme guaranteeing 100 days of wage employment in a financial year to every rural household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. While it has been instrumental in providing a safety net for rural poor, especially during economic downturns and crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, its implementation has been plagued by issues such as delayed wage payments, corruption, and inadequate work availability. The editorial highlights that a new law or policy related to rural employment is being considered, which necessitates a thorough review of MGNREGA's successes and failures. It points out that the scheme's budget allocation has often been insufficient, leading to wage payment delays. Furthermore, the quality of assets created under MGNREGA and the transparency in its operations need significant improvement. The article implicitly suggests that a new framework might build upon MGNREGA's lessons. An honest evaluation could lead to crucial reforms in MGNREGA, making it more efficient, transparent, and responsive to the needs of rural workers. Improved implementation would strengthen rural livelihoods, reduce distress migration, and enhance the creation of durable community assets. Conversely, a superficial review could perpetuate existing problems, undermining the scheme's objectives. This editorial is highly relevant for GS Paper II (Polity & Governance - Government Policies & Interventions, Social Justice, Welfare Schemes) and GS Paper III (Economy - Rural Development, Employment, Inclusive Growth). It covers the critical aspects of a major welfare scheme, its implementation challenges, and the need for policy reforms.

Key Facts

1.

Editorial calls for honest evaluation of MGNREGA

2.

MGNREGA launched in 2005

3.

Guarantees 100 days of wage employment to rural households

4.

Challenges: delayed wage payments, corruption, inadequate work

5.

New rural employment law being considered

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: Government Policies & Interventions, Social Justice, Welfare Schemes

2.

GS Paper III: Rural Development, Employment, Inclusive Growth, Budgeting

3.

Constitutional provisions related to Right to Work (DPSP)

4.

Challenges in implementation of welfare schemes and governance reforms

Visual Insights

MGNREGA: A Journey of Rural Employment & Challenges (2005-2026)

This timeline illustrates the key milestones, significant impacts, and persistent challenges faced by the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) since its inception, leading up to the current discussions on its evaluation and potential reforms.

MGNREGA has evolved from a legal right to work to a crucial social safety net, especially during crises. Its journey highlights both its immense potential in poverty alleviation and rural development, as well as the systemic challenges in implementation that necessitate continuous evaluation and reform.

  • 2005NREGA Act Enacted: A legal guarantee for 100 days of wage employment.
  • 2006NREGA Launched: Implemented in 200 poorest districts initially.
  • 2008Nationwide Expansion: Scheme extended to all rural districts of India.
  • 2009Renamed MGNREGA: Mahatma Gandhi's name added to the Act.
  • 2014-15Budgetary Scrutiny & Restoration: Initial cuts faced, later restored recognizing its importance.
  • 2020COVID-19 Safety Net: Provided critical employment to migrant workers during the pandemic, saw record demand.
  • 2022-23Persistent Challenges: Reports of delayed wage payments, insufficient budget allocation, and corruption issues intensified.
  • 2024-25Focus on Transparency: Increased emphasis on geo-tagging of assets, Aadhaar-based payments, and social audits to improve efficiency.
  • 2025-26Call for Honest Evaluation & Reforms: Discussions on comprehensive review of MGNREGA's effectiveness and consideration of new rural employment policy.
More Information

Background

The concept of providing employment as a safety net for the rural poor has a long history in India, predating MGNREGA. Early initiatives like the Rural Manpower Programme (1960s) and the Crash Scheme for Rural Employment (1970s) were largely ad-hoc and supply-driven. The 1980s saw the introduction of more structured programs such as the National Rural Employment Programme (NREP) and Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme (RLEGP), which were later merged into the Jawahar Rozgar Yojana (JRY) in 1989.

These schemes, while aiming to generate employment and create assets, often suffered from issues like leakages, poor asset quality, and lack of transparency. The Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS) launched in 1993, and the Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana (SGRY) in 2001, continued this trajectory. However, a significant shift occurred with the enactment of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) in 2005 (later renamed MGNREGA), which transformed employment generation from a welfare measure into a legal entitlement.

This marked a paradigm shift, making it a demand-driven scheme backed by a legal guarantee, drawing inspiration from Article 41 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which mandates the state to make effective provision for securing the right to work.

Latest Developments

In recent years, MGNREGA has witnessed several significant developments and ongoing debates. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted its crucial role as a safety net, with unprecedented demand for work, particularly from returning migrant workers, underscoring its counter-cyclical nature. This period also brought to light the persistent issue of delayed wage payments, prompting calls for more robust financial mechanisms and timely fund releases.

The government has increasingly focused on leveraging technology for better implementation, including Aadhaar-based payments, geo-tagging of assets, and the use of National Mobile Monitoring Software (NMMS) for attendance, aiming to enhance transparency and reduce corruption. There's an ongoing discussion about expanding the scope of MGNREGA, potentially increasing the guaranteed workdays from 100 to 150 days in certain drought-prone or tribal areas, or integrating it more closely with other rural development and climate resilience initiatives. Furthermore, the emphasis on social audits, though mandated, continues to be a critical area for strengthening accountability and community participation, with efforts to make these audits more effective and independent.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA): 1. It is a demand-driven scheme that provides a legal guarantee for wage employment. 2. The entire funding for the scheme, including wage and material components, is borne by the Central Government. 3. Social audit is a mandatory feature of MGNREGA, empowering local communities to monitor its implementation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is correct. MGNREGA is a demand-driven scheme, meaning work is provided upon demand, and it confers a legal right to employment, making it a legal guarantee. Statement 2 is incorrect. While the Central Government bears 100% of the wage cost of unskilled manual workers, the material component (75%) and administrative costs are shared between the Centre and State governments (75:25 ratio generally, with some exceptions for North-Eastern states). Therefore, the 'entire funding' is not borne solely by the Central Government. Statement 3 is correct. Social audit is a crucial and mandatory component of MGNREGA, designed to ensure transparency and accountability by involving local communities, particularly Gram Sabhas, in monitoring the scheme's implementation.

2. In the context of rural employment generation in India, which of the following statements best describes the paradigm shift brought about by the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) compared to its predecessors?

  • A.It was the first scheme to introduce wage employment for unskilled manual work in rural areas.
  • B.It shifted from a supply-driven welfare approach to a demand-driven legal entitlement for work.
  • C.It exclusively focused on creating durable community assets, unlike previous schemes.
  • D.It introduced the concept of direct benefit transfer (DBT) for wage payments for the first time.
Show Answer

Answer: B

Option A is incorrect because several earlier schemes like NREP, RLEGP, and JRY also provided wage employment for unskilled manual work. Option C is incorrect as previous schemes also aimed at creating community assets, and MGNREGA's focus is not exclusively on assets but also on employment generation. Option D is incorrect as DBT was implemented much later as a mode of payment, not as a foundational paradigm shift at the time of the Act's inception. Option B correctly identifies the core paradigm shift: MGNREGA transformed employment generation from a discretionary welfare measure (supply-driven, where the government decided when and where to provide work) into a legal right and a demand-driven program, where the government is legally obligated to provide work within a specified timeframe upon demand.

Part of Story Threads

MGNREGA Implementation and Challenges - January 2026

Concerns regarding the implementation, funding, and potential dismantling of MGNREGA, along with efforts to strengthen the scheme.

GKSolverToday's News