Concerns regarding the implementation, funding, and potential dismantling of MGNREGA, along with efforts to strengthen the scheme.
January 2026 saw continued debate over MGNREGA and the proposed Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, sparking opposition and fiscal federalism concerns. The Congress party's 'Kaam Maango Abhiyan' amplified these concerns, particularly regarding the impact of new regulations on women. Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan defended the new law's universal nature, while Rahul Gandhi criticized the government's alleged weakening of MGNREGA. Karnataka's Chief Minister accused the Union government of dismantling the scheme. An editorial questioned the rationale for replacing MGNREGA, emphasizing concerns about rural employment. As January concluded, an article highlighted MGNREGA's achievements and the V-B-G-RAMG framework's policy shift. In early February, civil society groups criticized the Union Budget's allocation for rural job schemes, citing a lack of clarity on the transition and funding.
Civil society groups criticized the Union Budget's allocation for rural job schemes, citing a lack of clarity on the transition and funding.
An article highlighted MGNREGA's successes and the V-B-G-RAMG framework as a policy shift in rural employment.
An editorial questioned the arguments for replacing MGNREGA, highlighting concerns about rural employment and the potential negative impacts of altering the scheme.
Rahul Gandhi called for unity to revive the MGNREGA scheme, criticizing the government's alleged weakening of the program.
Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan clarified that the new rural employment law, Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G) Act, is universal and demand-driven.
A new article highlighted concerns that new MGNREGA rules may hinder women's empowerment in rural India.
Karnataka's Chief Minister accused the Union government of dismantling MGNREGA, and the Congress party announced the launch of the 'Kaam Maango Abhiyan' to mobilize MGNREGA workers and demand work.
The Congress party raised concerns about fiscal federalism and inequality ahead of the Union Budget, highlighting states' concerns about the Centre’s approach to fiscal devolution and cost-sharing formulas.
Reports emerged about MGNREGA 2.0, focusing on strengthening the scheme through enhanced transparency, efficiency, and sustainable livelihood creation, while Karnataka considered legal action against the potential repeal of MGNREGA and the enactment of the Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act.
An editorial emphasized the need for an honest evaluation of MGNREGA to address systemic issues and ensure effective implementation.
Telangana Legislative Assembly passed a resolution urging the Union government to restore MGNREGA to its original form, criticizing amendments, implementation issues, and fund reductions.
Exam Notes
Constitutional articles, acts & key terms
Practice Questions
37 MCQs, 13 Mains questions
