NGT Issues Notice to Centre Over Air Pollution's Impact on Newborns' Health
NGT seeks Centre's response on air pollution causing severe health issues in newborns.
Photo by Andrei Marinho
Key Facts
NGT issued notices to Centre, Delhi govt on January 5, 2026
Plea highlights air pollution's impact on newborns
Study links foul air to respiratory illnesses in infants
NGT bench headed by Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper 3: Environment & Ecology - Pollution, Environmental Impact Assessment, Conservation
GS Paper 2: Polity & Governance - Statutory Bodies (NGT), Public Health, Government Policies & Interventions
GS Paper 1: Geography - Environmental Degradation, Urbanization issues
Visual Insights
Air Pollution Hotspots & NGT Jurisdiction in India (Jan 2026)
This map highlights Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) as a major air pollution hotspot, which is the focus of the NGT's recent notice. It also shows surrounding states contributing to the pollution issue (e.g., stubble burning) and the location of NGT's Principal Bench.
Loading interactive map...
Key Air Pollution & Health Impact Statistics (Delhi, 2025-26)
A dashboard presenting critical statistics related to air pollution in Delhi and its health impact, especially on vulnerable groups like newborns, as highlighted by the NGT notice.
- Delhi PM2.5 Annual Avg. (2025)
- 95 µg/m³+5% (vs. 2024)
- Increase in Infant Respiratory Illness (2025)
- 25-30%
- NGT Air Pollution Cases (2025)
- ~600+10% (vs. 2024)
- Economic Cost of Air Pollution (India, 2025)
- ~1.5% of GDP
Significantly higher than Indian NAAQS (40 µg/m³) and WHO guidelines (5 µg/m³), indicating persistent severe air quality issues.
Estimated increase in respiratory illnesses among newborns in highly polluted areas compared to low-pollution areas, directly linking to the NGT plea.
Number of cases filed/heard by NGT related to air pollution, reflecting increased judicial activism and public concern.
Estimated annual economic loss due to premature deaths, healthcare costs, and productivity loss from air pollution.
More Information
Background
The genesis of environmental protection in India can be traced back to the UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm (1972), which spurred global and national legislative action. India subsequently enacted the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act in 1974, followed by the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act in 1981, primarily to address industrial and vehicular emissions. The Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 served as a grim reminder of environmental negligence, leading to the comprehensive Environment (Protection) Act of 1986.
Despite these laws, the need for a specialized environmental court became evident due to the backlog in traditional courts and the technical nature of environmental disputes. This culminated in the establishment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in 2010, under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, providing a dedicated forum for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources.
Latest Developments
In recent years, India has intensified its efforts to combat air pollution beyond regulatory notices. The National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), launched in 2019, aims to reduce particulate matter concentration by 20-30% by 2024 in 131 non-attainment cities, adopting a multi-sectoral approach. The Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) has been institutionalized in Delhi-NCR, implementing emergency measures based on air quality levels.
There's a growing focus on transitioning to cleaner fuels, promoting electric vehicles through schemes like FAME-II, and adopting advanced technologies such as smog towers and anti-smog guns, though their efficacy remains debated. Furthermore, initiatives like the 'Parali Doosri Zindagi' (Stubble Burning Alternative) are exploring sustainable solutions for agricultural waste. The Supreme Court and NGT continue to play a proactive role, pushing for stricter enforcement and innovative solutions, reflecting a broader governmental and judicial commitment to public health and environmental quality.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. With reference to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in India, consider the following statements: 1. The NGT was established under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, ensuring the right to a healthy environment. 2. It has jurisdiction over all civil cases where a substantial question relating to the environment is involved. 3. The NGT is bound by the procedure laid down under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: B
Statement 1 is incorrect. The NGT was established under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, which is a statutory body, not directly under Article 21, though its mandate aligns with the right to a healthy environment derived from Article 21. Statement 2 is correct. The NGT has jurisdiction over all civil cases involving substantial environmental questions. Statement 3 is incorrect. The NGT is guided by the principles of natural justice and is not bound by the strict rules of procedure laid down by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. This allows it to adopt a more flexible and expeditious approach to environmental justice.
2. Which of the following statements correctly describes the difference between PM2.5 and PM10 in the context of air pollution? 1. PM2.5 refers to particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less, while PM10 refers to particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or less. 2. PM2.5 is primarily generated from natural sources like dust storms, whereas PM10 is mainly from anthropogenic sources like combustion. 3. PM2.5 can penetrate deeper into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, making it more hazardous to human health than PM10. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: C
Statement 1 is correct. PM2.5 and PM10 are defined by their aerodynamic diameter. Statement 2 is incorrect. Both PM2.5 and PM10 have both natural and anthropogenic sources. However, PM2.5 is more predominantly associated with combustion processes (vehicles, industries, biomass burning), while PM10 can include coarser particles from dust, pollen, and construction activities. Statement 3 is correct. Due to its smaller size, PM2.5 can bypass the body's natural defenses, penetrate deep into the respiratory system, and even cross into the bloodstream, leading to more severe health impacts compared to PM10.
3. Consider the following measures taken by the government to combat air pollution in India: 1. National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) 2. Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) 3. Bharat Stage (BS) Emission Norms 4. FAME India Scheme Which of the above measures are primarily aimed at reducing vehicular and industrial emissions?
- A.1, 2 and 3 only
- B.3 and 4 only
- C.1, 3 and 4 only
- D.1, 2, 3 and 4
Show Answer
Answer: D
All the listed measures are aimed at combating air pollution, with a significant focus on vehicular and industrial emissions: 1. National Clean Air Programme (NCAP): A comprehensive program to reduce particulate matter across 131 cities, which includes strategies to control industrial and vehicular emissions. 2. Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP): A set of emergency measures implemented in Delhi-NCR based on air quality, which includes restrictions on construction, industrial activities, and vehicular movement. 3. Bharat Stage (BS) Emission Norms: These are emission standards instituted by the Indian government to regulate the output of air pollutants from internal combustion engines and spark-ignition engines, directly targeting vehicular emissions. 4. FAME India Scheme (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles): Promotes the adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles, thereby reducing emissions from conventional fuel vehicles.
