For this article:

2 Jan 2026·Source: The Indian Express
2 min
International RelationsEconomyEDITORIAL

India's Geopolitical Realism: Navigating a Multipolar World

India must adopt sober realism to navigate a complex, multipolar global order by 2026.

India's Geopolitical Realism: Navigating a Multipolar World

Photo by Benjamin Smith

Editorial Analysis

The author advocates for a pragmatic and realistic approach to India's foreign policy, urging a shift from aspirational rhetoric to a grounded assessment of global power dynamics and India's internal capabilities to secure its interests in a multipolar world.

Main Arguments:

  1. The global order is rapidly transforming into a multipolar system, characterized by increased competition, shifting alliances, and a decline in established norms, requiring India to adapt its foreign policy.
  2. India's rise needs to be underpinned by robust internal economic growth and technological advancement, as these are the true foundations of national power and influence in the international arena.
  3. Strategic autonomy is crucial for India, allowing it to engage with various global powers (e.g., US, Russia, China) based on its national interests, without being constrained by rigid ideological blocs or external pressures.

Counter Arguments:

  1. An overly optimistic or idealistic view of India's global role might lead to miscalculations or overextension, neglecting the hard realities of power politics.

Conclusion

India must embrace "sober realism" by strengthening its domestic foundations and pursuing a flexible, interest-driven foreign policy to effectively navigate the complexities of the emerging multipolar world and secure its long-term strategic goals.

Policy Implications

This perspective suggests a foreign policy that prioritizes economic self-reliance, strategic partnerships over rigid alliances, and a cautious approach to global commitments, focusing on tangible outcomes rather than symbolic gestures.

The editorial argues for India to adopt a "sober realism" in its foreign policy, acknowledging the complexities and challenges of a rapidly evolving multipolar world. It suggests that the optimism surrounding India's rise needs to be tempered with a pragmatic assessment of global power dynamics, including the rise of China, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the shifting alliances.

The author emphasizes the need for India to strengthen its internal capabilities, foster economic growth, and strategically engage with various global powers without being drawn into rigid blocs. The core message is that India's influence will stem from its economic strength and strategic autonomy, rather than mere rhetorical aspirations.

Key Facts

1.

Global order shifting towards multipolarity

2.

Need for India to strengthen internal capabilities and economic growth

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

Evolution of India's foreign policy from Non-Alignment to Strategic Autonomy

2.

Characteristics and implications of a multipolar world order for India

3.

Role of economic strength and internal capabilities in foreign policy

4.

India's balancing act with major global powers (US, Russia, China)

5.

Geopolitical realism as a foreign policy doctrine

Visual Insights

India's Geopolitical Chessboard: Key Global Players (Jan 2026)

This map illustrates the major power centers and regions of strategic importance in the evolving multipolar world, highlighting India's central position and the complex global dynamics it navigates. It shows key countries and blocs mentioned in the news summary.

Loading interactive map...

📍United States📍China📍Russia📍European Union📍India📍Ukraine📍Japan📍Australia

India's Foreign Policy Trajectory: From Non-Alignment to Strategic Autonomy (1954-2026)

This timeline traces the key milestones and shifts in India's foreign policy, demonstrating its adaptation to changing global orders and the evolution towards 'geopolitical realism' and strategic autonomy.

India's foreign policy has evolved from the idealistic non-alignment of the Cold War to a pragmatic strategic autonomy in the multipolar 21st century. This evolution reflects a 'sober realism' in adapting to global power shifts, economic imperatives, and security challenges, culminating in its current multi-aligned approach.

  • 1954Panchsheel Principles: Foundation of India's foreign policy, emphasizing peaceful coexistence.
  • 1961Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Formation: India as a founding member, seeking equidistance from Cold War blocs.
  • 1991Economic Liberalization: Shift towards global economic integration, influencing foreign policy objectives.
  • 1992Look East Policy: Enhanced engagement with Southeast and East Asian nations.
  • 2014Act East Policy & Neighbourhood First Policy: Proactive engagement with Eastern neighbours and immediate periphery.
  • 2017Resurgence of Quad (India, US, Japan, Australia): Informal strategic dialogue focused on Indo-Pacific.
  • 2022Russia-Ukraine Conflict: India maintains balanced stance, prioritizing national interests (energy, security).
  • 2023India's G20 Presidency: Advocating for Global South, promoting inclusive global solutions.
  • 2024BRICS+ Expansion: India supports expansion, strengthening voice of Global South in multilateral forums.
  • 2025-2026Continued Multi-alignment & Strategic Autonomy: India navigates complex global landscape, strengthening internal capabilities and economic diplomacy.
More Information

Background

India's foreign policy has historically been shaped by the principle of Non-Alignment, particularly during the Cold War era. This principle aimed at maintaining independence from the two major power blocs.

However, with the end of the Cold War and the emergence of a unipolar moment, followed by the current multipolar world order, India's foreign policy has been undergoing a pragmatic evolution. The concept of 'strategic autonomy' has emerged as a more dynamic and active approach to safeguard national interests in a complex global landscape.

Latest Developments

The current global scenario is characterized by a rapidly evolving multipolar world. Key developments include the assertive rise of China, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, increasing great power competition, and the formation of new alliances (e.g., Quad) and shifting partnerships. These dynamics present both opportunities and challenges for India, necessitating a 'sober realism' in its foreign policy to navigate these complexities effectively.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding India's foreign policy in a multipolar world: 1. Strategic autonomy, unlike Non-Alignment, implies a complete disengagement from all major power blocs. 2. The current global order, characterized by the rise of multiple power centers, inherently reduces the scope for independent foreign policy choices for emerging economies. 3. India's pursuit of economic growth and strengthening internal capabilities is seen as a prerequisite for enhancing its strategic autonomy. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is incorrect. Strategic autonomy is about independent decision-making based on national interest, not complete disengagement. It allows for flexible engagement with various blocs/powers. Non-Alignment also sought independent decision-making but was often framed in the context of Cold War blocs. Statement 2 is incorrect. A multipolar world, with multiple centers of power, generally *increases* the scope for independent foreign policy choices for emerging economies as it offers more partners and reduces the dominance of any single bloc, allowing for balancing acts. Statement 3 is correct. The editorial explicitly states that India's influence and strategic autonomy will stem from its economic strength and internal capabilities.

2. In the context of 'geopolitical realism' as a foreign policy approach for India, which of the following statements best describes its core tenet?

  • A.Prioritizing ideological alignment with democratic nations over economic interests.
  • B.Basing foreign policy decisions on a pragmatic assessment of national power, interests, and global realities.
  • C.Advocating for a unipolar world order led by a single dominant power to ensure stability.
  • D.Strictly adhering to multilateral institutions and international law, even at the expense of national security.
Show Answer

Answer: B

Option A is incorrect as geopolitical realism emphasizes national interest and power, often transcending ideological alignments. Option C is incorrect; realism acknowledges existing power structures, and the editorial specifically discusses a *multipolar* world, not advocating for unipolarity. Option D is incorrect; while multilateralism is important, realism prioritizes national interest and security, which may sometimes necessitate a flexible approach to international norms. Option B accurately defines geopolitical realism as a pragmatic approach that assesses national power, interests, and the realities of the global power distribution to guide foreign policy decisions.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News