For this article:

23 Dec 2025·Source: The Hindu
2 min
Social IssuesPolity & GovernanceNEWS

Kerala Government Assures Justice for Lynched Migrant Worker's Family

Kerala government pledges justice for a lynched migrant worker, highlighting migrant safety concerns.

UPSCSSC
Kerala Government Assures Justice for Lynched Migrant Worker's Family

Photo by Ivan Henao

Quick Revision

1.

Migrant worker from Chhattisgarh lynched in Kerala

2.

Kerala government promised justice and financial aid

3.

5 people arrested in connection with the lynching

Visual Insights

Migrant Worker Lynching: Origin and Incident Location

This map illustrates the geographical context of the tragic incident, showing the victim's home state (Chhattisgarh) and the state where the lynching occurred (Kerala). It highlights the inter-state migration pattern and the vulnerability of workers moving across state borders.

Loading interactive map...

📍Kerala📍Chhattisgarh

Exam Angles

1.

Constitutional provisions and fundamental rights related to internal migration and labor.

2.

Legal frameworks for migrant workers (e.g., Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979) and their effectiveness.

3.

Government schemes and initiatives for migrant welfare (e.g., One Nation One Ration Card, e-Shram portal).

4.

Socio-economic challenges faced by migrant workers (discrimination, exploitation, lack of social security, access to services).

5.

Role of state and central governments in protecting migrant workers and ensuring social integration.

6.

Ethical dimensions of human dignity, social justice, and empathy towards vulnerable populations.

View Detailed Summary

Summary

In a tragic incident, a migrant worker from Chhattisgarh was lynched in Kerala, leading to widespread condemnation and a swift response from the state government. Five individuals have been arrested in connection with the crime.

The Kerala government has assured the victim's family of justice and financial assistance, emphasizing its commitment to protecting migrant workers. This incident brings to the forefront the vulnerabilities faced by migrant laborers in India, often subjected to discrimination and violence, and underscores the need for robust legal protection and social integration policies.

Background

Internal migration in India is a significant socio-economic phenomenon, with millions moving from rural to urban areas or between states in search of livelihood. Historically, these movements have been largely unregulated, leading to exploitation and vulnerability.

The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979, was enacted to protect these workers, but its implementation has faced challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic starkly exposed the deep-seated vulnerabilities, lack of social security, and discrimination faced by migrant laborers.

Latest Developments

The recent lynching of a migrant worker in Kerala, followed by swift government action and assurance of justice, highlights the ongoing issues of safety, discrimination, and the need for better integration and protection mechanisms for migrant workers. The incident underscores that despite their crucial contribution to the economy, migrant workers often remain marginalized and susceptible to violence and exploitation.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. With reference to migrant workers in India, consider the following statements: 1. The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979, mandates registration of establishments employing five or more inter-state migrant workmen. 2. Article 19(1)(d) and (e) of the Indian Constitution guarantees all citizens the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India, respectively. 3. The Code on Social Security, 2020, aims to provide universal social security coverage to all unorganised workers, including migrant workers. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: D

Statement 1: The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979, applies to every establishment in which five or more inter-state migrant workmen are employed or were employed on any day of the preceding twelve months. This statement is correct. Statement 2: Article 19(1)(d) guarantees the right to move freely throughout the territory of India, and Article 19(1)(e) guarantees the right to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India. These are fundamental rights available to all citizens, including migrant workers. This statement is correct. Statement 3: The Code on Social Security, 2020, subsumes several existing labor laws, including the Unorganised Workers' Social Security Act, 2008. It aims to extend social security benefits to all unorganised workers, including gig workers, platform workers, and inter-state migrant workers, through various schemes. This statement is correct. Therefore, all three statements are correct.

2. Consider the following initiatives by the Government of India aimed at welfare and protection of migrant workers: 1. One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC) scheme 2. e-Shram portal 3. Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) 4. Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rojgar Yojana (ABRY) Which of the above initiatives directly address the challenges faced by inter-state migrant workers?

  • A.1, 2 and 3 only
  • B.1, 2 and 4 only
  • C.3 and 4 only
  • D.1, 2, 3 and 4
Show Answer

Answer: D

1. One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC) scheme: Enables migrant beneficiaries to claim their foodgrains from any Fair Price Shop (FPS) in the country, addressing a major challenge for migrants in accessing PDS benefits. This is correct. 2. e-Shram portal: A national database of unorganised workers, including migrant workers, to facilitate the delivery of social security schemes. This is correct. 3. Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY): Provides free food grains to beneficiaries, including migrant workers, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is correct. 4. Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rojgar Yojana (ABRY): Incentivizes employers for creation of new employment along with social security benefits and restoration of employment lost during COVID-19 pandemic. It benefits new employees, including migrant workers who lost jobs. This is correct. All four initiatives directly address various challenges faced by inter-state migrant workers.

3. Which of the following statements is NOT correct regarding the socio-economic vulnerabilities of internal migrant workers in India?

  • A.A significant proportion of internal migrants are employed in the informal sector, leading to lack of formal contracts and social security benefits.
  • B.The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979, has been effectively implemented across all states, ensuring fair wages and working conditions.
  • C.Migrant workers often face discrimination, xenophobia, and limited access to public services like healthcare and education in their destination states.
  • D.The 'push factors' like lack of employment opportunities and agrarian distress in rural areas are primary drivers for internal migration in India.
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement A is correct. A large majority of internal migrants work in the informal sector, which lacks formal contracts, minimum wage guarantees, and social security benefits, making them highly vulnerable. Statement C is correct. Migrant workers frequently encounter discrimination, xenophobia, and difficulties in accessing public services due to lack of identity documents, domicile requirements, or social exclusion. Statement D is correct. 'Push factors' such as poverty, unemployment, low agricultural productivity, and lack of basic amenities in rural areas are major drivers compelling people to migrate to urban centers or other states. Statement B is NOT correct. Despite its existence, the Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979, has faced significant challenges in effective implementation across states. Issues include lack of awareness, poor enforcement mechanisms, limited registration of contractors and establishments, and inadequate grievance redressal, leading to continued exploitation of migrant workers.