For this article:

3 Dec 2025·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesPolity & GovernanceNEWS

Kashi Tamil Sangamam Highlights Language Politics and Cultural Exchange

MoS L. Murugan stated he couldn't learn Hindi in Tamil Nadu due to politics, emphasizing the Kashi Tamil Sangamam's role in cultural unity.

UPSCSSC
Kashi Tamil Sangamam Highlights Language Politics and Cultural Exchange

Photo by Belinda Fewings

त्वरित संशोधन

1.

MoS L. Murugan stated he couldn't learn Hindi in Tamil Nadu due to politics.

2.

Kashi Tamil Sangamam aims to strengthen cultural ties between Kashi and Tamil Nadu.

3.

The event highlights linguistic sensitivities and national integration efforts.

दृश्य सामग्री

Kashi Tamil Sangamam: Bridging Cultural & Linguistic Divides

This map illustrates the geographical locations of Kashi (Varanasi) in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, the two regions central to the Kashi Tamil Sangamam initiative. It visually represents the cultural exchange effort aimed at strengthening ties despite the historical context of language politics.

Loading interactive map...

📍Kashi (Varanasi)📍Tamil Nadu

Evolution of Language Politics & Policy in India

This timeline traces key historical events and policy developments related to India's official language policy and the political dynamics surrounding language, particularly highlighting the role of anti-Hindi agitations and recent cultural initiatives.

India's language policy has been a sensitive issue since independence, balancing the promotion of Hindi with the protection of regional languages. Historical agitations, particularly in Tamil Nadu, have shaped legislative frameworks, ensuring linguistic diversity and preventing perceived imposition. Recent initiatives like Kashi Tamil Sangamam attempt to bridge these divides through cultural understanding.

  • 1947-1949Constituent Assembly Debates on Official Language: Intense discussions on Hindi's status, leading to a compromise.
  • 1950Article 343: Hindi in Devanagari script declared official language of the Union; English to continue for 15 years.
  • 1963Official Languages Act: Provided for the continued use of English for official purposes of the Union even after 1965.
  • 1965Anti-Hindi Agitations in Tamil Nadu: Widespread protests against perceived Hindi imposition, leading to political shifts.
  • 1967Official Languages (Amendment) Act: Mandated the use of English indefinitely until non-Hindi states agree to discontinue it.
  • 1968Three-Language Formula adopted: Promoted learning Hindi, English, and a regional language in schools.
  • 2020National Education Policy (NEP 2020): Emphasizes mother tongue instruction up to Grade 5 and multilingualism, reigniting debates on language.
  • 2022-2023Kashi Tamil Sangamam: Government initiative to celebrate cultural ties between Kashi and Tamil Nadu, promoting national integration through cultural exchange amidst language debates.

परीक्षा के दृष्टिकोण

1.

Constitutional provisions related to language (Articles 343-351, Eighth Schedule)

2.

Centre-State relations and federalism, particularly concerning language policy

3.

Historical context of anti-Hindi agitations and linguistic reorganization of states

4.

Government initiatives for cultural exchange and national integration

5.

Role of language in identity politics and national unity

विस्तृत सारांश देखें

सारांश

During the ongoing Kashi Tamil Sangamam, Minister of State L. Murugan shared a personal anecdote, stating that he couldn't learn Hindi in Tamil Nadu due to the prevailing language politics in the state. This statement underscores the historical and ongoing linguistic sensitivities in India, particularly the resistance to Hindi imposition in non-Hindi speaking states like Tamil Nadu.

The Kashi Tamil Sangamam itself is a government initiative aimed at celebrating and strengthening the ancient cultural and civilizational ties between Kashi (Varanasi) and Tamil Nadu. Such events are crucial for fostering national integration and promoting cultural exchange, but they also bring to light underlying issues of linguistic identity and political narratives around language.

पृष्ठभूमि

India is a linguistically diverse nation, with 22 official languages recognized under the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution. The debate over a national or official language has been a contentious issue since independence, leading to significant political movements, particularly in non-Hindi speaking states like Tamil Nadu. The Official Languages Act, 1963, and subsequent amendments, aim to balance the promotion of Hindi with the protection of regional languages and the continued use of English.

नवीनतम घटनाक्रम

The Kashi Tamil Sangamam is a government initiative designed to celebrate and strengthen ancient cultural and civilizational ties between Kashi (Varanasi) and Tamil Nadu. During the ongoing event, a Minister's statement about the inability to learn Hindi in Tamil Nadu due to 'language politics' has brought the historical and ongoing linguistic sensitivities back into focus. This highlights the delicate balance between promoting national integration through cultural exchange and respecting linguistic identities.

बहुविकल्पीय प्रश्न (MCQ)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Kashi Tamil Sangamam: 1. It is an initiative aimed at strengthening cultural and civilizational ties between Varanasi and Tamil Nadu. 2. The event promotes the exchange of knowledge in various fields including arts, literature, and traditional crafts. 3. Such cultural exchange programs are explicitly mandated by Article 51A of the Indian Constitution. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.1 and 2 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Statements 1 and 2 are correct as per the news summary and the stated objectives of the Kashi Tamil Sangamam. Statement 3 is incorrect. Article 51A deals with Fundamental Duties, which include promoting harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities. While cultural exchange programs align with the spirit of these duties, they are not explicitly mandated by Article 51A.

2. With reference to the official language of the Union and states in India, consider the following statements: 1. Article 343 of the Constitution declares Hindi in Devanagari script as the official language of the Union. 2. The Official Languages Act, 1963, mandates the continued use of English for official purposes of the Union even after 1965. 3. A state legislature can adopt any one or more of the languages in use in the state or Hindi as the official language(s) for that state. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: D

Statement 1 is correct: Article 343(1) states that the official language of the Union shall be Hindi in Devanagari script. Statement 2 is correct: The Official Languages Act, 1963, provided for the continued use of English, in addition to Hindi, for official purposes of the Union even after 1965, addressing concerns from non-Hindi speaking states. Statement 3 is correct: Article 345 empowers the legislature of a state to adopt any one or more of the languages in use in the state or Hindi as the official language or languages for all or any of the official purposes of that state.

3. Which of the following statements correctly describes the historical context of language politics in Tamil Nadu?

  • A.The anti-Hindi agitation in Tamil Nadu primarily began after the implementation of the three-language formula by the Central Government in the 1980s.
  • B.The Dravidian movement, which gained prominence in Tamil Nadu, advocated for the imposition of Tamil as the sole official language of India.
  • C.The resistance to Hindi imposition in Tamil Nadu is rooted in concerns over linguistic identity, cultural autonomy, and perceived threats to the Tamil language's status.
  • D.The States Reorganisation Act of 1956 explicitly recognized Hindi as the national language, leading to widespread protests in non-Hindi speaking states.
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: C

Option C correctly describes the historical context. The resistance in Tamil Nadu has consistently been about protecting Tamil identity and culture from perceived Hindi dominance. Option A is incorrect; anti-Hindi agitations began much earlier, notably in the 1930s and intensified in the 1960s. Option B is incorrect; while the Dravidian movement championed Tamil, its primary goal was not to impose Tamil as the sole official language of India, but to protect Tamil's status and resist Hindi imposition. Option D is incorrect; the States Reorganisation Act of 1956 was based on linguistic reorganization of states, not on declaring Hindi as the national language, and India does not have a 'national language' as per the Constitution.

4. Assertion (A): The Kashi Tamil Sangamam aims to foster national integration through cultural exchange. Reason (R): Language policies in India, particularly regarding Hindi, have historically been a source of tension between the Union and some non-Hindi speaking states, impacting national integration efforts. In the context of the above two statements, which one of the following is correct?

  • A.Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
  • B.Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
  • C.A is true but R is false.
  • D.A is false but R is true.
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true statements. The Kashi Tamil Sangamam indeed aims to promote national integration through cultural ties. Similarly, language policies, especially concerning Hindi, have historically caused friction between the Centre and non-Hindi states, affecting national integration. However, Reason (R) describes a challenge or an underlying issue that makes national integration difficult, while Assertion (A) describes an initiative *aimed at* achieving national integration despite such challenges. R is not a direct explanation of A's objective, but rather provides context for the complexity of national integration efforts in India.