For this article:

3 Dec 2025·Source: The Hindu
2 min
Environment & EcologyPolity & GovernanceEDITORIAL

India's Environment in Crisis: Urgent Action Needed to Reverse Degradation

An editorial highlighting the severe degradation of India's natural environment due to policy failures and lack of enforcement, calling for urgent reforms.

UPSCSSC
India's Environment in Crisis: Urgent Action Needed to Reverse Degradation

Photo by Vijay Kumar Gaba

त्वरित संशोधन

1.

India's environmental performance index (EPI) ranking is 180 out of 180.

2.

2020 notification allowed construction projects up to 150,000 sq m to bypass environmental impact assessment.

3.

Forest clearances for non-forest use have increased significantly.

4.

Over 34,000 deaths annually due to air pollution.

महत्वपूर्ण तिथियां

2020 (notification)2018 (notification)2024 (Tiger Conservation Authority report)

महत्वपूर्ण संख्याएं

180 (EPI rank)150,000 sq m (construction projects)34,000 (deaths)

दृश्य सामग्री

India's Environmental Crisis: Causes, Impacts & Call for Action

This mind map illustrates the core arguments of the editorial, highlighting the causes of environmental degradation, its impacts, and the proposed solutions, providing a holistic view of the crisis.

India's Environment in Crisis

  • Rapid Ecological Deterioration
  • Underlying Causes
  • Unsustainable Approach
  • Call for Fundamental Shift

संपादकीय विश्लेषण

The author believes India's environmental policies are failing due to weak enforcement, a focus on economic growth over ecology, and a lack of integrated governance, leading to severe environmental degradation.

मुख्य तर्क:

  1. India's environmental performance is abysmal, evidenced by its low EPI ranking, indicating a systemic failure in environmental governance.
  2. Environmental clearance processes are often diluted or bypassed, allowing destructive projects to proceed without adequate assessment or public participation.
  3. The current policy framework, including amendments to environmental laws, prioritizes ease of doing business over ecological protection, leading to unsustainable resource exploitation.
  4. The lack of integrated environmental governance, where various ministries work in silos, prevents a holistic approach to environmental protection.

निष्कर्ष

The editorial concludes that India needs a fundamental shift towards integrated environmental governance, stronger enforcement, and a recognition that environmental protection is crucial for long-term economic stability and public health.

नीतिगत निहितार्थ

Calls for stricter EIA, better enforcement of environmental laws, inter-ministerial coordination, and a shift from a project-by-project approach to a landscape-level approach for environmental management.

परीक्षा के दृष्टिकोण

1.

Constitutional provisions related to environmental protection (Article 48A, 51A(g), Article 253).

2.

Major environmental laws and their amendments (e.g., Environment (Protection) Act, Forest (Conservation) Act, EIA Notification).

3.

Role and effectiveness of institutions like the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), and Central/State Pollution Control Boards.

4.

Concepts of sustainable development, ecological footprint, ecosystem services, and carrying capacity.

5.

Challenges in environmental governance, policy implementation, and regulatory enforcement.

6.

Interlinkages between economic development, poverty, social justice, and environmental degradation.

7.

Principles of environmental jurisprudence (Polluter Pays, Precautionary Principle, Public Trust Doctrine).

विस्तृत सारांश देखें

सारांश

This editorial paints a grim picture of India's natural environment, arguing that despite various laws and policies, the country's ecological health is rapidly deteriorating. It points out that environmental clearances are often fast-tracked without proper scrutiny, leading to widespread destruction of forests, wetlands, and other critical ecosystems. The author emphasizes that the current approach, which prioritizes economic development over environmental protection, is unsustainable and calls for a fundamental shift towards integrated environmental governance.

पृष्ठभूमि

India's environmental protection journey began post-Stockholm Conference 1972, leading to constitutional amendments (Article 48A, 51A(g)) and landmark legislation like the Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, and the umbrella Environment (Protection) Act 1986. Early grassroots movements like Chipko highlighted growing environmental concerns.

नवीनतम घटनाक्रम

Recent years have seen intense debates around the efficacy and potential dilution of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) norms, fast-tracking of environmental clearances for infrastructure and industrial projects, and concerns over the independence and capacity of environmental regulatory bodies. Reports consistently highlight India's poor performance on various environmental indices, with increasing pollution levels, deforestation, wetland loss, and biodiversity degradation. The push for 'ease of doing business' often clashes with stringent environmental safeguards, leading to a perceived trade-off between economic growth and ecological sustainability.

बहुविकल्पीय प्रश्न (MCQ)

1. Consider the following statements regarding environmental protection in India: 1. The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India added Article 48A, mandating the State to protect and improve the environment. 2. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, was enacted under Article 253 of the Constitution to implement decisions taken at the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm. 3. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) Act, 2010, was enacted to provide for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: D

Statement 1 is correct: Article 48A, a Directive Principle of State Policy, was indeed added by the 42nd Amendment in 1976, directing the State to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and wildlife. Statement 2 is correct: The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, is an umbrella legislation enacted under Article 253 (Parliament's power to legislate for giving effect to international agreements) to implement the decisions of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in June 1972. Statement 3 is correct: The NGT Act, 2010, established the National Green Tribunal for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources, including enforcement of any legal right relating to environment and giving relief and compensation for damages to persons and property.

2. In the context of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in India, which of the following statements is NOT correct?

  • A.EIA is a statutory requirement under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
  • B.Public hearing is a mandatory step for all categories of projects requiring environmental clearance.
  • C.The EIA process aims to identify, predict, and evaluate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of a proposed project.
  • D.Post-clearance monitoring is an integral part of the EIA notification to ensure compliance with conditions.
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: B

Statement A is correct: EIA in India is a statutory requirement, primarily governed by the EIA Notification issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Statement C is correct: The core objective of EIA is to assess the potential impacts (environmental, social, economic) of a proposed project before its implementation. Statement D is correct: Post-clearance monitoring and compliance reporting are crucial components of the EIA process to ensure that the project adheres to the stipulated environmental conditions. Statement B is NOT correct: Public hearing is not mandatory for *all* categories of projects requiring environmental clearance. For instance, certain Category B projects (specifically B2 projects) are exempted from public hearings. Also, projects in certain strategic sectors or those located in industrial estates/zones may have exemptions.

3. Consider the following principles often invoked in environmental jurisprudence in India: 1. The Polluter Pays Principle 2. The Precautionary Principle 3. The Public Trust Doctrine Which of these principles is/are recognized and applied by Indian courts in environmental cases?

  • A.1 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 2 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
उत्तर देखें

सही उत्तर: D

All three principles – the Polluter Pays Principle, the Precautionary Principle, and the Public Trust Doctrine – have been recognized and applied by the Supreme Court of India and the National Green Tribunal in various landmark judgments. The 'Polluter Pays Principle' holds the polluter responsible for the costs of pollution. The 'Precautionary Principle' states that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. The 'Public Trust Doctrine' mandates the State to protect natural resources (like air, water, forests) as a trustee for the public and future generations.