What is Prevention of Corruption Act?
Historical Background
Key Points
10 points- 1.
Defines offences related to corruption, including bribery, criminal misconduct, and abuse of power.
- 2.
Provides for penalties for offences, including imprisonment and fines.
- 3.
Section 17A (introduced in 2018 amendment) mandates prior sanction for prosecuting public servants for offences under the Act.
- 4.
Covers public servants, including government employees, judges, and employees of public sector undertakings.
- 5.
Special courts are established to try offences under the Act.
- 6.
The Act also provides for the attachment and forfeiture of property acquired through corruption.
- 7.
The 2018 amendment also criminalized the act of giving a bribe, in addition to taking a bribe.
- 8.
The Act aims to promote transparency and accountability in public administration.
- 9.
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) plays a crucial role in monitoring and enforcing the Act.
- 10.
The Act is applicable to offences committed both within and outside India.
Visual Insights
Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 vs. Amendment 2018
Comparison of the key features of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and its 2018 amendment.
| Feature | 1988 Act | 2018 Amendment |
|---|---|---|
| Bribery | Only bribe-takers were liable | Both bribe-givers and bribe-takers are liable |
| Prior Sanction | No prior sanction required to prosecute public servants | Prior sanction required to prosecute public servants |
| Time Limit for Trial | No specific time limit | Trials to be completed within 2 years, extendable to 4 |
| Definition of Undue Advantage | Not clearly defined | Broadly defined to include any form of favor or benefit |
| Protection of Honest Public Servants | Limited | Enhanced protection with prior sanction requirement |
Recent Developments
5 developmentsSupreme Court's split verdict on Section 17A regarding prior approval for prosecution.
Increased focus on investigation and prosecution of corruption cases.
Amendments to strengthen the Act and enhance its effectiveness.
Use of technology and data analytics to detect and prevent corruption.
International cooperation in combating corruption and recovering illicit assets.
This Concept in News
2 topicsLalu Prasad, Rabri Devi Face Charges in Land-for-Jobs Case
17 Feb 2026The land-for-jobs case highlights the practical application of the Prevention of Corruption Act in addressing alleged corruption in public appointments. This news demonstrates how the Act is used to investigate and prosecute individuals accused of abusing their power for personal benefit. The case also raises questions about the effectiveness of the Act in preventing corruption, as the alleged offenses occurred several years ago. This news underscores the importance of understanding the Act's provisions, its limitations, and the challenges in its implementation. Analyzing this case in the context of the Act provides insights into the ongoing efforts to combat corruption and promote transparency in governance. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing news related to corruption and forming informed opinions on governance issues.
Mizoram MP claims defence land scam issue blocked in Parliament
7 Feb 2026This news highlights the ongoing challenge of corruption in land acquisition, an area particularly vulnerable to abuse. The alleged scam demonstrates how public officials can potentially exploit their positions for personal gain, violating the principles of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The news underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in land procurement processes. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of existing oversight mechanisms. The incident serves as a reminder that even with laws in place, vigilance and strong enforcement are crucial to deterring corruption. Understanding the provisions of the Act is essential for analyzing such news events and evaluating the government's response. This news reinforces the importance of strengthening anti-corruption measures and promoting ethical conduct in public service. Without a thorough understanding of the Act, it is impossible to critically assess the allegations and their potential implications for governance and public trust.
