For this article:

26 Feb 2026·Source: The Indian Express
4 min
RS
Richa Singh
|International
International RelationsEDITORIAL

US-Iran Tensions: A Gamble of Nerves Without a Clear Strategy

The US lacks a coherent strategy in dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Editorial Analysis

The author argues that the US approach to Iran has been reactive and lacks a long-term vision for managing the complex dynamics in the region. They suggest that a more proactive and strategic approach is needed to address the challenges posed by Iran's nuclear advancements and regional activities.

Main Arguments:

  1. The US-Iran relationship is characterized by mutual distrust and a lack of clear strategy, making it a high-stakes gamble.
  2. The Biden administration's attempts to revive the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) have been complicated by Iran's continued nuclear advancements and regional activities.
  3. The US approach has been reactive, lacking a long-term vision for managing the complex dynamics in the region.

Amid escalating tensions between the US and Iran, India has issued an advisory on February 23, 2026, urging its citizens in Iran to leave the country using available transportation. This follows President Trump's statement that a nuclear deal with Iran is 'within reach' but warning of a 'very bad day' if no deal is made. Indirect nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran are scheduled for February 26, 2026, in Geneva, with the US holding a 'zero enrichment' line and Iran seeking immediate sanctions relief.

The US has increased its military presence in the Middle East, deploying over 150 military aircraft and positioning the USS Gerald R. Ford in the Mediterranean, marking the largest concentration of US naval and air power in the region since 2003. Iran's Revolutionary Guards launched drills along the southern Gulf coast, and there are reports of student protests against Ayatollah Khamenei at Tehran University.

These international pressures coincide with a resurgence of anti-government protests at major Iranian universities. India's dilemma deepens as Iran remains its closest and cheapest source of hydrocarbons and a key partner in developing multi-modal trade corridors to Afghanistan, Central Asia, and Europe through the Chabahar port. The situation is relevant to UPSC exams, particularly GS Paper II, focusing on international relations and India's foreign policy.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper II: International Relations, India's Foreign Policy

2.

Connects to syllabus topics on US foreign policy, Middle East geopolitics, and energy security

3.

Potential question types: analytical questions on the impact of US-Iran tensions on India, the role of JCPOA, and the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz

In Simple Words

The US and Iran don't trust each other, and it's like they're playing a risky game without a clear plan. The US tried to bring back the Iran nuclear deal, but Iran keeps making progress with its nuclear program, which makes things even harder.

India Angle

This situation affects India because instability in the Middle East can impact oil prices and regional security, both of which are important for India's economy and strategic interests.

For Instance

Think of it like two neighbors constantly arguing and escalating the situation without trying to find a peaceful solution. This creates tension and uncertainty for everyone in the neighborhood.

It matters because tensions between the US and Iran can lead to conflicts that affect global stability and the price of essential resources like oil.

US-Iran tensions are a high-stakes gamble with no clear strategy, impacting global stability.

The article discusses the current state of US-Iran relations, characterizing it as a high-stakes gamble driven by mutual distrust and a lack of clear strategy. It highlights the Biden administration's attempts to revive the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) and the challenges posed by Iran's continued nuclear advancements and regional activities.

The author argues that the US approach has been reactive and lacks a long-term vision for managing the complex dynamics in the region. The article also points out the risks of escalation and miscalculation, emphasizing the need for a more coherent and diplomatic approach to de-escalate tensions and address the underlying issues.

Expert Analysis

The current US-Iran tensions highlight several key concepts in international relations. The first is Deterrence Theory, which suggests that a state can prevent another from taking an undesirable action by posing a credible threat of retaliation. The US military buildup in the Middle East, including the deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford and over 150 military aircraft, is intended to deter Iran from further nuclear advancements or aggressive regional actions. However, Iran's threats to close the Strait of Hormuz also represent a form of deterrence, aiming to dissuade the US from military strikes.

Another crucial concept is the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal. Formally backed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015), the JCPOA placed verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The US unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 under President Trump, reimposing sanctions and leading to Iran's gradual rollback of its commitments. The current indirect talks in Geneva aim to revive the JCPOA, but disagreements over sanctions relief and enrichment levels remain significant obstacles.

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital chokepoint for global energy supplies, with nearly one-fifth of global petroleum consumption and LNG trade passing through it daily. Any disruption to this strait, whether through Iranian threats or military conflict, could lead to a sharp spike in oil prices and significant economic consequences for countries like India, which relies heavily on oil imports. The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz is a major factor driving market anxiety and strategic calculations.

Finally, the concept of Proxy Warfare is relevant, as Iran supports various non-state actors in the region, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. These groups can be used to exert pressure on regional rivals and threaten maritime security, further complicating the US-Iran dynamic. For UPSC aspirants, understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing international relations, particularly in the context of the Middle East. Prelims questions may focus on the JCPOA, Strait of Hormuz, and deterrence theory, while Mains questions could explore the implications of US-Iran tensions for India's energy security and foreign policy.

Visual Insights

Key Locations in US-Iran Tensions

This map highlights key locations involved in the US-Iran tensions, including the Strait of Hormuz, Iran, and US naval bases in the region.

Loading interactive map...

📍Iran📍Strait of Hormuz📍Bahrain
More Information

Background

The relationship between the United States and Iran has been strained since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which overthrew the US-backed Shah and established an Islamic Republic. The hostage crisis at the US embassy in Tehran further deteriorated relations, leading to economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation. The US has long been concerned about Iran's nuclear program, fearing it could lead to the development of nuclear weapons. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed in 2015 by Iran, the US, and other world powers, aimed to curb Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. However, in 2018, the US under President Trump unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA and reimposed sanctions, citing concerns about Iran's ballistic missile program and regional activities. This decision led to increased tensions and Iran's gradual rollback of its commitments under the JCPOA. The current tensions are also influenced by regional dynamics, including Iran's rivalry with Saudi Arabia and its support for proxy groups in countries like Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen. The Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil supplies, has been a flashpoint in the past, with Iran threatening to close it in response to sanctions or military action. These factors contribute to the complex and volatile situation between the US and Iran.

Latest Developments

In recent years, there have been several attempts to revive the JCPOA, particularly under the Biden administration. Indirect talks between the US and Iran have taken place in Vienna and Oman, but significant disagreements remain, especially regarding sanctions relief and Iran's nuclear enrichment levels. The US has maintained that it will not lift all sanctions until Iran returns to full compliance with the JCPOA, while Iran insists on the removal of all sanctions first. In response to the reimposition of sanctions, Iran has gradually increased its nuclear activities, including enriching uranium to higher levels and developing advanced centrifuges. These actions have raised concerns among Western powers and Israel, leading to increased military deployments in the region. The US has also been working with its allies in the Gulf to enhance maritime security and counter Iranian threats to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Looking ahead, the future of US-Iran relations remains uncertain. The outcome of the ongoing nuclear talks will be crucial in determining whether tensions can be de-escalated or whether the region is headed towards further conflict. The US is likely to continue its policy of deterrence and engagement, seeking to contain Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional influence while also exploring diplomatic solutions.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA): 1. The JCPOA was formally backed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in 2015. 2. The JCPOA placed verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for military assistance. 3. The United States unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 under President Trump. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is CORRECT: The JCPOA was formally backed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in 2015. Statement 2 is INCORRECT: The JCPOA placed verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for SANCTIONS RELIEF, not military assistance. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The United States unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 under President Trump.

Source Articles

RS

About the Author

Richa Singh

International Relations Enthusiast & UPSC Writer

Richa Singh writes about International Relations at GKSolver, breaking down complex developments into clear, exam-relevant analysis.

View all articles →

GKSolverToday's News