For this article:

16 Feb 2026·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
International RelationsNEWS

Europe Rejects US 'Civilizational Erasure' Claim at Munich Security Conference

European leaders refute US narrative of civilizational clash at Munich conference.

Europe Rejects US 'Civilizational Erasure' Claim at Munich Security Conference

Photo by ian kelsall

European leaders at the Munich Security Conference pushed back against the US narrative of a 'civilizational erasure,' with some calling it untrue. Cracks in the Western Hemisphere came to the fore during the conference as leaders debated the concept. The discussions highlighted differing perspectives on global challenges and the role of Western civilization.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper 2: International Relations - Impact of globalization on culture

2.

GS Paper 1: History - Colonialism and its impact on cultural identity

3.

GS Paper 4: Ethics - Values and ethics in international relations

Visual Insights

Key Countries Involved in the 'Civilizational Erasure' Debate

This map highlights the US and Europe, the key actors in the debate at the Munich Security Conference. It shows their geographical locations and differing perspectives on global challenges.

Loading interactive map...

📍United States📍Germany
More Information

Background

The concept of 'civilization' has been debated for centuries. It often involves shared cultural, social, and political characteristics. Historically, the idea of a superior civilization has been used to justify colonialism and dominance. This is linked to concepts like Orientalism, where the West defined itself in opposition to the East. The idea of a 'clash of civilizations' gained prominence in the late 20th century. Samuel Huntington's thesis suggested that future conflicts would be based on cultural and religious identities rather than ideological ones. This theory has been criticized for oversimplifying complex global dynamics and ignoring internal divisions within civilizations. The concept of soft power, which emphasizes cultural and diplomatic influence, provides an alternative to the 'clash of civilizations' narrative. Different countries have varying perspectives on their role in the world and the importance of their cultural values. Some emphasize universal values and international cooperation, while others prioritize national interests and cultural uniqueness. The rise of multipolarity challenges the dominance of any single civilization or power bloc. This shift necessitates a more nuanced understanding of global relations and cultural exchange. Discussions about 'civilizational erasure' often involve concerns about cultural homogenization and the loss of unique traditions. This can be linked to the impact of globalization and the spread of Western cultural products. However, it's important to recognize that cultures are constantly evolving and adapting, and that cultural exchange can also lead to innovation and enrichment.

Latest Developments

Recent geopolitical events have highlighted differing perspectives on global order and values. The rise of new economic powers and the resurgence of nationalism have challenged the traditional dominance of the West. This has led to debates about the future of multilateralism and the role of international institutions like the United Nations. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global governance and highlighted the importance of international cooperation. However, it also led to increased nationalism and protectionism, with some countries prioritizing their own interests over global solidarity. Discussions about 'civilizational erasure' are often linked to concerns about the erosion of cultural identity in the face of globalization and technological change. Looking ahead, it's likely that debates about values and global order will continue to shape international relations. The rise of new technologies like artificial intelligence and social media raises questions about cultural influence and the spread of information. Finding ways to promote intercultural dialogue and understanding will be crucial for building a more peaceful and inclusive world. The concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, the world is one family, can be a guiding principle for fostering global cooperation.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the 'civilizational erasure' claim mentioned in the context of the Munich Security Conference, and why is it important for UPSC Prelims?

The 'civilizational erasure' claim refers to a narrative, reportedly from the US, suggesting a decline or disappearance of Western civilization's influence. Understanding this is important for Prelims as it touches upon debates about global order, the role of the West, and differing perspectives on international relations. These themes are often tested in the context of current events.

2. How does the concept of 'civilizational erasure' relate to the historical concept of Orientalism?

The concept of 'civilizational erasure' can be seen as a modern iteration of historical narratives like Orientalism. Orientalism historically involved the West defining itself in opposition to the East, often portraying Eastern cultures as inferior. Similarly, the 'civilizational erasure' claim implies a perceived decline of Western values and influence, potentially framing other cultures or ideologies as threats.

3. What is multilateralism, and why is it relevant to the discussions at the Munich Security Conference regarding 'civilizational erasure'?

Multilateralism refers to cooperation among multiple countries on a given issue. It is relevant because the debate over 'civilizational erasure' touches on the future of global cooperation. If major powers disagree on fundamental values and the global order, multilateralism becomes more challenging to maintain.

4. Why is the debate about 'civilizational erasure' at the Munich Security Conference considered a crack in the Western Hemisphere?

The disagreement between the US and European leaders over the 'civilizational erasure' narrative indicates a division within the Western Hemisphere. This suggests differing perspectives on global challenges, the role of Western civilization, and the appropriate strategies for engaging with the rest of the world. Such divisions can weaken the collective influence of the West on global affairs.

5. How might the differing views on 'civilizational erasure' impact international institutions like the United Nations?

Differing views on 'civilizational erasure' can impact international institutions by creating divisions among member states. This can hinder consensus-building, weaken the legitimacy of these institutions, and make it more difficult to address global challenges effectively. Disagreements on fundamental values can undermine the spirit of cooperation that these institutions are built upon.

6. From an ethical standpoint, what are the potential dangers of promoting a narrative of 'civilizational erasure'?

Promoting a narrative of 'civilizational erasure' carries the risk of fueling xenophobia and intolerance. It can lead to the demonization of other cultures or ideologies, potentially justifying discriminatory policies or even conflict. Such narratives often oversimplify complex global issues and can be used to manipulate public opinion.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Which of the following statements best describes the concept of 'soft power'?

  • A.The use of military force to achieve political objectives.
  • B.The ability to influence others through cultural and diplomatic means.
  • C.The imposition of economic sanctions to coerce a country's behavior.
  • D.The use of propaganda to manipulate public opinion.
Show Answer

Answer: B

Soft power refers to the ability to influence others through cultural attraction, values, and ideas, rather than coercion or force. This includes diplomacy, cultural exchange programs, and promoting a country's values on the international stage. Options A, C, and D describe forms of hard power, which rely on coercion.

2. Consider the following statements regarding the 'clash of civilizations' theory: 1. It posits that future conflicts will primarily be based on ideological differences. 2. Samuel Huntington is credited with popularizing this theory. 3. The theory has been criticized for oversimplifying complex global dynamics. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is INCORRECT: The 'clash of civilizations' theory suggests that future conflicts will be based on cultural and religious identities, not ideological differences. Statement 2 is CORRECT: Samuel Huntington popularized the theory in his 1993 Foreign Affairs article and subsequent book. Statement 3 is CORRECT: The theory has been criticized for being overly simplistic and ignoring internal divisions within civilizations.

3. In the context of international relations, what does 'multipolarity' generally refer to?

  • A.A world order dominated by a single superpower.
  • B.A world order with multiple centers of power and influence.
  • C.A world order characterized by the absence of any major powers.
  • D.A world order where all countries have equal power and influence.
Show Answer

Answer: B

Multipolarity refers to a world order in which power is distributed among multiple states or actors, rather than being concentrated in a single superpower (unipolarity) or two dominant powers (bipolarity). It implies a more complex and fluid international system with shifting alliances and competing interests.

Source Articles

Europe News, Latest Europe News, Breaking News Europe | The Indian Express

The Indian Express·16 Feb 2026

Daily Briefing: All you need to know about the India-EU pacts | Live News - The Indian Express

The Indian Express·16 Feb 2026

‘Mother of all deals’: EU chief says ‘historic trade agreement’ with India soon | Business News - The Indian Express

The Indian Express·16 Feb 2026

Latest News on European Union: Get European Union News Updates along with Photos, Videos and Latest News Headlines | The Indian Express

The Indian Express·16 Feb 2026

Daily Briefing: The European turn | Live News - The Indian Express

The Indian Express·16 Feb 2026

GKSolverToday's News