For this article:

13 Feb 2026·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesEDITORIAL

Parliament Must Remember Sushma Swaraj's Words: 'Opponents, Not Enemies'

Article emphasizes the need for respectful discourse in Parliament, recalling Sushma Swaraj's wisdom.

Editorial Analysis

Parliamentary proceedings should be conducted with respect and decorum, viewing political opponents as collaborators in nation-building rather than enemies.

Main Arguments:

  1. Maintaining respectful dialogue is crucial for effective parliamentary function.
  2. Political opponents should be seen as collaborators, not enemies.
  3. Upholding decorum enhances the quality of parliamentary debates.
  4. Constructive engagement leads to better policy outcomes.

Conclusion

Parliament must remember Sushma Swaraj’s words: ‘Opponents, not enemies’.
The article reflects on the importance of maintaining respectful dialogue and debate within the Parliament, referencing the words of the late Sushma Swaraj, who emphasized that political opponents should not be viewed as enemies. It underscores the necessity of upholding decorum and constructive engagement in parliamentary proceedings. The article likely discusses the current state of parliamentary affairs and advocates for a more collaborative and respectful environment.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper 2: Parliament and State Legislatures – structure, functioning, conduct of business, powers & privileges and issues arising out of these.

2.

Connects to the syllabus by addressing the functioning of Parliament and the importance of maintaining decorum and constructive debate.

3.

Potential question types include statement-based MCQs on parliamentary procedures and analytical questions on the role of the opposition.

More Information

Background

The essence of parliamentary democracy lies in respectful dialogue and debate. This principle has deep roots in the history of democratic institutions. The concept of parliamentary sovereignty, where the legislature holds supreme authority, necessitates a culture of constructive engagement between the ruling party and the opposition. This ensures that diverse viewpoints are considered in the law-making process. Over time, the nature of parliamentary discourse has evolved. Initially, debates were characterized by greater civility and adherence to parliamentary procedure. However, with increasing political polarization, parliamentary proceedings have often been marred by disruptions and acrimonious exchanges. This trend has raised concerns about the erosion of democratic values and the effectiveness of parliamentary institutions. Key concepts like separation of powers and checks and balances are crucial for maintaining a healthy democracy. The legal and constitutional framework for parliamentary proceedings is enshrined in the Constitution of India. Article 105 deals with the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha provide detailed guidelines for the conduct of parliamentary debates and discussions. These rules aim to ensure orderly and productive proceedings.

Latest Developments

In recent years, there has been increasing concern about the decline in parliamentary decorum and the rise of disruptive tactics. Frequent adjournments, walkouts, and unruly behavior have become commonplace, hindering the effective functioning of the Parliament. This has led to calls for reforms to strengthen parliamentary procedures and promote more constructive engagement between the government and the opposition. The role of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha in maintaining order and decorum is crucial. Several initiatives have been proposed to address these challenges. These include stricter enforcement of parliamentary rules, enhanced training for parliamentarians, and promotion of dialogue and consensus-building. Some experts have also suggested reforms to the committee system to allow for more in-depth scrutiny of legislation and greater participation by members of parliament. The effectiveness of these initiatives will depend on the willingness of all political parties to prioritize the national interest over partisan considerations. The future of parliamentary democracy in India hinges on restoring a culture of respect, dialogue, and constructive engagement. This requires a commitment from all stakeholders to uphold the values of the Constitution and to prioritize the effective functioning of parliamentary institutions. The emphasis should be on fostering a collaborative environment where diverse viewpoints can be expressed and debated in a civil and respectful manner. This will ensure that Parliament remains a vibrant and effective forum for representing the interests of the people.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why is the concept of 'opponents, not enemies' important in the context of the Indian Parliament?

The idea of 'opponents, not enemies,' as highlighted by Sushma Swaraj, is crucial for maintaining a healthy parliamentary democracy. It encourages respectful debate, constructive criticism, and collaboration, which are essential for effective governance and representing diverse viewpoints.

2. How does the principle of 'Parliamentary Sovereignty' relate to the need for respectful dialogue in the Parliament?

Parliamentary sovereignty, where the legislature holds supreme authority, necessitates a culture of constructive engagement. Respectful dialogue ensures that diverse viewpoints are considered in the law-making process, leading to more inclusive and effective legislation.

3. What are the potential consequences of a decline in parliamentary decorum?

A decline in parliamentary decorum can lead to frequent disruptions, hinder effective law-making, erode public trust in the government, and create a hostile political environment.

4. What is the role of the opposition in ensuring constructive parliamentary debates?

The opposition plays a crucial role in holding the government accountable, offering alternative perspectives, and scrutinizing proposed legislation. Their constructive engagement is vital for informed decision-making and maintaining a healthy democracy.

5. Why is the article emphasizing Sushma Swaraj's words in the current political climate?

The article likely emphasizes Sushma Swaraj's words due to recent concerns about declining parliamentary decorum and increasing political polarization. Her message serves as a reminder of the importance of respectful dialogue and collaboration in a democratic system.

6. What aspects of 'Parliamentary Decorum' are important for UPSC Prelims?

For UPSC Prelims, understand the basic principles of parliamentary decorum, its importance in a democracy, and the consequences of its decline. Focus on the role of the Speaker and the rules of procedure that maintain order in the House.

7. How can the principles advocated by Sushma Swaraj be applied to improve the functioning of the Indian Parliament?

Sushma Swaraj's emphasis on respectful dialogue can be applied by promoting cross-party discussions, encouraging active listening, and fostering a culture of mutual respect among parliamentarians. This can lead to more productive debates and better policy outcomes.

8. What recent developments have highlighted the need for improved parliamentary decorum in India?

Recent disruptions, walkouts, and unruly behavior in Parliament have highlighted the urgent need for reforms to strengthen parliamentary procedures and promote more constructive engagement between the government and the opposition.

9. How does the concept of 'Separation of Powers' relate to parliamentary debates?

Separation of powers ensures that different branches of government (legislature, executive, judiciary) have distinct roles. Parliamentary debates are crucial for the legislature to effectively check the executive's power and ensure accountability.

10. What are the key takeaways from the article for UPSC Mains regarding 'Parliamentary Decorum'?

For UPSC Mains, the key takeaway is the importance of maintaining parliamentary decorum for effective governance and a healthy democracy. You should be able to discuss the causes of declining decorum, its consequences, and potential solutions, referencing the views of key personalities like Sushma Swaraj.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding Article 105 of the Constitution of India: 1. It deals with the composition of the Houses of Parliament. 2. It defines the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. 3. It specifies the procedure for the election of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2, and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is INCORRECT: Article 105 does NOT deal with the composition of the Houses of Parliament. The composition is covered under Articles 79 and 80 for the Parliament. Statement 2 is CORRECT: Article 105 defines the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: Article 105 does NOT specify the procedure for the election of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Article 93 deals with the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker.

2. Which of the following statements accurately reflects the concept of parliamentary sovereignty?

  • A.The Parliament is subject to the judicial review of the Supreme Court in all matters.
  • B.The Parliament has the supreme authority to make or repeal any law, and no other body can override its decisions.
  • C.The Parliament's powers are limited by the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
  • D.The President of India has the power to veto any law passed by the Parliament.
Show Answer

Answer: B

Option B is the most accurate. Parliamentary sovereignty means the Parliament has the supreme legal authority to make or repeal any law. While judicial review (A) and fundamental rights (C) do act as checks, they do not negate the principle of Parliament's ultimate law-making power. The President (D) can return a bill for reconsideration, but Parliament can override this.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News