Parliament Must Remember Sushma Swaraj's Words: 'Opponents, Not Enemies'
Article emphasizes the need for respectful discourse in Parliament, recalling Sushma Swaraj's wisdom.
Editorial Analysis
Parliamentary proceedings should be conducted with respect and decorum, viewing political opponents as collaborators in nation-building rather than enemies.
Main Arguments:
- Maintaining respectful dialogue is crucial for effective parliamentary function.
- Political opponents should be seen as collaborators, not enemies.
- Upholding decorum enhances the quality of parliamentary debates.
- Constructive engagement leads to better policy outcomes.
Conclusion
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper 2: Parliament and State Legislatures – structure, functioning, conduct of business, powers & privileges and issues arising out of these.
Connects to the syllabus by addressing the functioning of Parliament and the importance of maintaining decorum and constructive debate.
Potential question types include statement-based MCQs on parliamentary procedures and analytical questions on the role of the opposition.
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why is the concept of 'opponents, not enemies' important in the context of the Indian Parliament?
The idea of 'opponents, not enemies,' as highlighted by Sushma Swaraj, is crucial for maintaining a healthy parliamentary democracy. It encourages respectful debate, constructive criticism, and collaboration, which are essential for effective governance and representing diverse viewpoints.
2. How does the principle of 'Parliamentary Sovereignty' relate to the need for respectful dialogue in the Parliament?
Parliamentary sovereignty, where the legislature holds supreme authority, necessitates a culture of constructive engagement. Respectful dialogue ensures that diverse viewpoints are considered in the law-making process, leading to more inclusive and effective legislation.
3. What are the potential consequences of a decline in parliamentary decorum?
A decline in parliamentary decorum can lead to frequent disruptions, hinder effective law-making, erode public trust in the government, and create a hostile political environment.
4. What is the role of the opposition in ensuring constructive parliamentary debates?
The opposition plays a crucial role in holding the government accountable, offering alternative perspectives, and scrutinizing proposed legislation. Their constructive engagement is vital for informed decision-making and maintaining a healthy democracy.
5. Why is the article emphasizing Sushma Swaraj's words in the current political climate?
The article likely emphasizes Sushma Swaraj's words due to recent concerns about declining parliamentary decorum and increasing political polarization. Her message serves as a reminder of the importance of respectful dialogue and collaboration in a democratic system.
6. What aspects of 'Parliamentary Decorum' are important for UPSC Prelims?
For UPSC Prelims, understand the basic principles of parliamentary decorum, its importance in a democracy, and the consequences of its decline. Focus on the role of the Speaker and the rules of procedure that maintain order in the House.
7. How can the principles advocated by Sushma Swaraj be applied to improve the functioning of the Indian Parliament?
Sushma Swaraj's emphasis on respectful dialogue can be applied by promoting cross-party discussions, encouraging active listening, and fostering a culture of mutual respect among parliamentarians. This can lead to more productive debates and better policy outcomes.
8. What recent developments have highlighted the need for improved parliamentary decorum in India?
Recent disruptions, walkouts, and unruly behavior in Parliament have highlighted the urgent need for reforms to strengthen parliamentary procedures and promote more constructive engagement between the government and the opposition.
9. How does the concept of 'Separation of Powers' relate to parliamentary debates?
Separation of powers ensures that different branches of government (legislature, executive, judiciary) have distinct roles. Parliamentary debates are crucial for the legislature to effectively check the executive's power and ensure accountability.
10. What are the key takeaways from the article for UPSC Mains regarding 'Parliamentary Decorum'?
For UPSC Mains, the key takeaway is the importance of maintaining parliamentary decorum for effective governance and a healthy democracy. You should be able to discuss the causes of declining decorum, its consequences, and potential solutions, referencing the views of key personalities like Sushma Swaraj.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding Article 105 of the Constitution of India: 1. It deals with the composition of the Houses of Parliament. 2. It defines the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. 3. It specifies the procedure for the election of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2, and 3
Show Answer
Answer: B
Statement 1 is INCORRECT: Article 105 does NOT deal with the composition of the Houses of Parliament. The composition is covered under Articles 79 and 80 for the Parliament. Statement 2 is CORRECT: Article 105 defines the powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members. Statement 3 is INCORRECT: Article 105 does NOT specify the procedure for the election of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Article 93 deals with the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker.
2. Which of the following statements accurately reflects the concept of parliamentary sovereignty?
- A.The Parliament is subject to the judicial review of the Supreme Court in all matters.
- B.The Parliament has the supreme authority to make or repeal any law, and no other body can override its decisions.
- C.The Parliament's powers are limited by the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
- D.The President of India has the power to veto any law passed by the Parliament.
Show Answer
Answer: B
Option B is the most accurate. Parliamentary sovereignty means the Parliament has the supreme legal authority to make or repeal any law. While judicial review (A) and fundamental rights (C) do act as checks, they do not negate the principle of Parliament's ultimate law-making power. The President (D) can return a bill for reconsideration, but Parliament can override this.
Source Articles
‘Opponents, not enemies’: Parliament needs to remember Sushma Swaraj’s words once more | Political Pulse News - The Indian Express
‘We don’t need this’: Rajasthan Health Minister remark over Right to Health law sparks outrage in Assembly | India News - The Indian Express
Committee hearing: Joint polls do not violate Constitution’s basic structure, says former CJI Gavai | India News - The Indian Express
‘Every day, someone’s dignity is tarnished’ — J&K Assembly erupts over ‘fake news and doctored videos’ | India News - The Indian Express
Why Rohit and Parth Pawar are in spotlight post Ajit Pawar death? | Mumbai News - The Indian Express
