Proclamation Regarding Appearance of Accused Person: Legal Notice
Legal notice requiring appearance of accused person under Section 82 CrPC.
Key Facts
A proclamation has been issued requiring the appearance of Shyam Singh.
Shyam Singh is the son of Shri Moti Singh.
Shyam Singh resides at Village Majra, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P.
Shyam Singh is required to appear before the court to answer the complaint.
The appearance is required on or before 17.04.2026.
UPSC Exam Angles
GS Paper II: Polity and Governance - Criminal Justice System
Link to Fundamental Rights and Due Process
Potential for questions on CrPC provisions and judicial interpretations
Visual Insights
Location of Accused Person
Shows the location of the accused person, Shyam Singh, in Himachal Pradesh.
Loading interactive map...
More Information
Background
Latest Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is a proclamation under Section 82 CrPC, and why is it important for the UPSC exam?
A proclamation under Section 82 CrPC is a legal notice requiring an accused person to appear in court. It's important for UPSC as it relates to criminal procedure, a key aspect of Polity & Governance.
2. What are the key facts to remember about this specific proclamation notice for the UPSC Prelims exam?
For the UPSC Prelims, remember that Shyam Singh, son of Shri Moti Singh, residing at Village Majra, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P., is required to appear in court on or before 17.04.2026.
3. How do recent developments in proclamation issuance, such as the use of technology, impact the common citizen?
The use of technology in issuing proclamations, such as electronic notifications, aims to ensure that accused persons receive timely notice, reducing the chances of unjust arrests or prolonged legal proceedings. This can lead to fairer and more efficient justice for common citizens.
4. Why is the issuance of this proclamation for appearance in the news?
The issuance of a proclamation for appearance is in the news as it highlights the legal procedures followed by the courts to ensure the presence of an accused person in court. It showcases the implementation of Section 82 of the CrPC.
5. For Mains, how can I explain the background context of proclamations under CrPC?
In a Mains answer, explain that the CrPC, enacted in 1973, provides the framework for criminal justice administration in India. The proclamation process ensures that accused persons are given a fair opportunity to appear before the court, upholding principles of natural justice.
6. What is the legal basis for issuing a proclamation requiring the appearance of an accused person?
The legal basis for issuing a proclamation is Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). This section allows a court to issue a proclamation requiring an accused person to appear if they are evading arrest.
Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the proclamation requiring the appearance of an accused person under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC): 1. The proclamation must specify a time not less than 30 days from the date of publishing it requiring the person to appear. 2. Failure to appear after the proclamation may lead to attachment of the accused's property. 3. The proclamation is issued only after a warrant for arrest has been issued and the court has reason to believe that the person has absconded. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A.1 and 2 only
- B.2 and 3 only
- C.1 and 3 only
- D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer
Answer: D
All three statements are correct regarding the proclamation requiring the appearance of an accused person under the CrPC. Statement 1 is correct as Section 82 of the CrPC specifies a time not less than 30 days. Statement 2 is correct as failure to appear may lead to attachment of property under Section 83. Statement 3 is also correct as a proclamation is generally issued after a warrant and when the court believes the person has absconded.
2. In the context of the proclamation issued for the appearance of Shyam Singh, son of Shri Moti Singh, which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the legal process? A) The proclamation guarantees Shyam Singh's immediate arrest upon appearance. B) The proclamation requires Shyam Singh to appear before the court to answer a complaint. C) The proclamation automatically leads to the confiscation of Shyam Singh's property. D) The proclamation is issued without any prior attempt to serve a warrant.
- A.The proclamation guarantees Shyam Singh's immediate arrest upon appearance.
- B.The proclamation requires Shyam Singh to appear before the court to answer a complaint.
- C.The proclamation automatically leads to the confiscation of Shyam Singh's property.
- D.The proclamation is issued without any prior attempt to serve a warrant.
Show Answer
Answer: B
The most accurate statement is B. The proclamation, as per the news summary, requires Shyam Singh to appear before the court to answer the complaint. Option A is incorrect as the proclamation is to ensure appearance, not immediate arrest. Option C is incorrect as confiscation is not automatic. Option D is generally incorrect as a warrant is usually attempted first.
3. Which of the following is NOT a consequence of non-appearance after a proclamation under Section 82 of the CrPC? A) Attachment of property. B) Declaration as a proclaimed offender. C) Initiation of contempt of court proceedings. D) The court can proceed ex parte.
- A.Attachment of property.
- B.Declaration as a proclaimed offender.
- C.Initiation of contempt of court proceedings.
- D.The court can proceed ex parte.
Show Answer
Answer: C
The correct answer is C. While non-appearance after a proclamation can lead to attachment of property (A), declaration as a proclaimed offender (B), and the court proceeding ex parte (D), it does not directly initiate contempt of court proceedings. Contempt of court is a separate legal action for disrespecting the court.
Source Articles
Punjab and Haryana HC issues guidelines for declaring a person as ‘proclaimed offender’ | Chandigarh News - The Indian Express
Can courts consider anticipatory bail plea of accused declared absconder? Allahabad High Court answers
ED can’t make PMLA arrest after cognisance, needs court nod: Supreme Court | India News - The Indian Express
