For this article:

22 Jan 2026·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesNEWS

60% TV/Digital News Regulator Orders Cite Communal Code Breach

Nearly 60% of TV/digital news regulator orders cite communal harmony code breach.

60% TV/Digital News Regulator Orders Cite Communal Code Breach

Photo by mustafa alabri

In the past three years, nearly 60% of orders issued by an independent self-regulatory body for private TV and digital news broadcasters cited violations of its ethics code related to communal harmony. These orders were issued by the News Broadcasting & Digital Standards Authority (NBDSA). From 2023 to 2025, the NBDSA received 54 complaints and issued 43 penalizing orders, with 39 cases related to communal issues and 15 cases related to non-communal issues. The NBDSA also issued 37 orders for the removal of content and 6 orders imposing fines, with the total value of fines amounting to ₹3.2 lakh. The average time taken from complaint to order was 11-12 months.

Key Facts

1.

Orders citing communal code breach: Nearly 60%

2.

Complaints received (2023-2025): 54

3.

Penalizing orders issued: 43

4.

Communal cases: 39

5.

Non-communal cases: 15

6.

Orders for content removal: 37

7.

Orders imposing fines: 6

8.

Total value of fines: ₹3.2 lakh

9.

Avg time from complaint to order: 11-12 months

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

GS Paper 2: Polity and Governance - Regulatory bodies, media regulation

2.

GS Paper 3: Security - Role of media in spreading misinformation and communal disharmony

3.

Potential question types: Statement-based, analytical questions on media ethics and regulation

Visual Insights

More Information

Background

The concept of media regulation in India has evolved significantly since independence. Initially, the focus was on government control through bodies like Doordarshan and All India Radio. However, with the liberalization of the economy in the 1990s, private media channels proliferated, necessitating a shift towards self-regulation.

The Press Council of India, established in 1966, served as an early model for ethical oversight in print media. The evolution of self-regulatory bodies for broadcasting, like the NBDSA, reflects an attempt to balance freedom of expression with the need to maintain journalistic standards and prevent the spread of misinformation and hate speech. This balance is crucial in a diverse and democratic society like India.

Latest Developments

Recent years have seen increased scrutiny of media content, particularly on digital platforms, leading to debates about the effectiveness of existing regulatory mechanisms. The government has introduced the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which aim to regulate digital news and OTT platforms.

This has sparked discussions about potential overreach and its impact on journalistic freedom. The future of media regulation in India is likely to involve a combination of self-regulation, statutory oversight, and evolving legal frameworks to address the challenges posed by the rapidly changing media landscape and the spread of misinformation.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What percentage of orders by the NBDSA cited breaches of communal harmony codes?

Nearly 60% of the orders issued by the NBDSA cited breaches of communal harmony codes.

2. What is the NBDSA and why is it important in the context of media regulation in India?

The News Broadcasting & Digital Standards Authority (NBDSA) is an independent self-regulatory body for private TV and digital news broadcasters. It is important because it oversees ethical conduct and standards, especially concerning communal harmony, in news broadcasting.

3. What is the time frame for the complaints reviewed in the article?

The complaints reviewed in the article pertain to the period from 2023 to 2025.

4. How many complaints did the NBDSA receive between 2023 and 2025, and how many resulted in penalizing orders?

The NBDSA received 54 complaints between 2023 and 2025, and issued 43 penalizing orders.

5. What is the breakdown of communal vs. non-communal cases among the penalizing orders issued by the NBDSA?

Out of the penalizing orders, 39 cases related to communal issues and 15 cases related to non-communal issues.

6. What is the average time taken by NBDSA from complaint to order?

The average time taken from complaint to order by the NBDSA was 11-12 months.

7. What are the pros and cons of self-regulation by bodies like NBDSA?

Pros include industry expertise and flexibility. Cons include potential bias and lack of enforcement power compared to government regulation.

8. What reforms might be needed to improve the effectiveness of media regulation in India?

Reforms could include clearer guidelines, stronger enforcement mechanisms, and greater public participation in the regulatory process. Also, more transparency in the functioning of self-regulatory bodies is needed.

9. Why is the high percentage of communal code breaches in news broadcasting a concern?

It raises concerns about biased reporting, potential for inciting violence, and the erosion of social harmony. This can impact public trust in media and exacerbate societal divisions.

10. What are the recent developments related to media regulation in India, as indicated in the background context?

The government introduced the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which aim to regulate digital news and OTT platforms. This has sparked discussions about potential overreach and censorship.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the News Broadcasting & Digital Standards Authority (NBDSA): 1. It is a statutory body established by an Act of Parliament. 2. It is a self-regulatory body for private TV and digital news broadcasters. 3. It can impose monetary fines and order the removal of content. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

The NBDSA is a self-regulatory body, not a statutory body. It can impose fines and order content removal. Hence, statements 2 and 3 are correct.

2. Which of the following is NOT a function typically associated with media self-regulatory bodies like the NBDSA?

  • A.Adjudicating complaints related to ethical violations
  • B.Prescribing and enforcing a code of ethics for broadcasters
  • C.Issuing licenses to operate broadcasting channels
  • D.Promoting media literacy and responsible journalism
Show Answer

Answer: C

Issuing licenses is typically a function of government regulatory bodies, not self-regulatory bodies.

3. In the context of media regulation in India, what is the primary objective of codes of ethics for news broadcasters?

  • A.To maximize profits for media companies
  • B.To promote government propaganda
  • C.To ensure objectivity, impartiality, and accuracy in reporting
  • D.To suppress dissenting voices and critical journalism
Show Answer

Answer: C

Codes of ethics aim to uphold journalistic standards and ensure responsible reporting.

4. Assertion (A): Self-regulatory bodies like NBDSA play a crucial role in maintaining ethical standards in media. Reason (R): These bodies have the power to impose legally binding penalties on broadcasters. In the context of the above, which of the following is correct?

  • A.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
  • B.Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
  • C.A is true, but R is false
  • D.A is false, but R is true
Show Answer

Answer: C

While self-regulatory bodies play a crucial role, they do not have the power to impose legally binding penalties. Their penalties are often in the form of fines or content removal orders, which may be challenged in courts.

GKSolverToday's News