5 min0%
6 January 2026|The Indian Express
5 min read
International RelationsEnvironment & EcologyEnvironment & EcologyNEWS

Greenland Rejects US Annexation Amidst Climate Change Geopolitics

Greenland firmly tells US "no more annexations," highlighting climate change's geopolitical impact.

Background Context

Greenland's strategic importance dates back centuries, but its modern geopolitical relevance solidified during the 20th century. During World War II, with Denmark under Nazi occupation, the United States established a protectorate over Greenland in 1941 through an agreement with the Danish ambassador, ensuring its defense and preventing Axis control. Post-war, in 1946, the US even offered to purchase Greenland from Denmark for $100 million, a proposal rejected by Copenhagen. During the Cold War, Greenland became a critical outpost for Western defense, hosting the Thule Air Base, a key component of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) early warning system. This historical context of external strategic interest contrasts with Greenland's evolving internal autonomy. It gained Home Rule in 1979 and further self-governance under the Self-Government Act of 2009, which granted it control over most domestic affairs, including resource management, while foreign policy and defense largely remain Danish responsibilities. This journey towards greater self-determination underpins its current assertiveness.

What HappenedGreenland, an autonomous Danish territory, has firmly rejected any notion of annexation by the United States, stating "no more annexations" in response to renewed US interest. This declaration comes amidst increasing global attention on the Arctic region, driven by the accelerating impacts of climate change, which are opening new shipping routes and access to vast natural resources. Context & BackgroundUS interest in Greenland is not new; President Donald Trump famously explored purchasing the island in 2019, a proposal that was swiftly dismissed by both Greenland and Denmark. Historically, the US has had strategic interests in Greenland, particularly during World War II and the Cold War, due to its critical geopolitical location. The current renewed interest is largely fueled by the strategic importance of the Arctic. Key Details & FactsGreenland's government emphasized its commitment to self-determination and its strong ties with Denmark. The melting Arctic ice cap is making the region more accessible, leading to a scramble among global powers for potential resources like oil, gas, and rare earth minerals, as well as strategic military positioning. Greenland's vast ice sheet is also a critical indicator of global climate health. Implications & ImpactThis firm rejection by Greenland underscores the growing assertiveness of smaller nations in global geopolitics, especially concerning their sovereignty and natural resources. It also highlights the complex interplay between climate change, resource competition, and international relations in the Arctic. The region's future will have significant implications for global trade, security, and environmental stability. Different PerspectivesWhile the US views Greenland as a strategic asset, Greenland and Denmark emphasize self-governance and environmental protection. Some analysts suggest that US interest, while framed strategically, also reflects a desire to secure resources and counter Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic. Exam RelevanceThis topic is highly relevant for International Relations (GS Paper 2) and Environment & Ecology (GS Paper 3) due to its focus on Arctic geopolitics, climate change impacts, resource competition, and sovereignty issues.

Key Facts

1

Greenland is an autonomous Danish territory

2

Greenland rejected US annexation

3

US President Donald Trump explored purchasing Greenland in 2019

4

Arctic region gaining strategic importance due to climate change and resources

Latest Developments

Beyond the immediate rejection of US annexation, the Arctic region is witnessing a broader surge in geopolitical activity. Russia has significantly ramped up its military presence, reopening Soviet-era bases and conducting extensive military exercises, particularly along its Northern Sea Route. China, though not an Arctic nation, has declared itself a 'near-Arctic state' and is actively pursuing its 'Polar Silk Road' initiative, investing in research stations, shipping, and resource extraction projects, primarily in collaboration with Russia. This increasing great power competition has strained the Arctic Council, the primary intergovernmental forum for Arctic cooperation, especially after Russia's invasion of Ukraine led to a temporary suspension of its activities. Concurrently, the accelerating pace of climate change is not only opening new shipping lanes but also exposing vast, previously inaccessible reserves of oil, gas, and critical rare earth minerals, intensifying the scramble for resources. The future outlook points towards continued competition for influence and resources, coupled with urgent calls for sustainable development and environmental protection amidst the rapid ecological transformation of the Arctic.

4 Key Concepts to Understand

This article covers important concepts like Climate Change, Arctic Geopolitics and 2 more. Understanding these will help you answer exam questions better.

Ready to test your understanding?

13 practice questions available