Himachal Student Dies After Ragging and Sexual Assault; Professor, Three Others Booked

Himachal student dies after alleged ragging and sexual assault; professor and three students booked under new BNS.

Photo by D A R W N

A 19-year-old government college student in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, died last month following alleged ragging and sexual assault. Three women students have been booked for ragging and voluntarily causing hurt, while a professor from the same institute faces charges of sexual harassment. The FIR was registered under Sections 75 (sexual harassment) and 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and Section 3 of the Himachal Pradesh Educational Institution (Prohibition of) Ragging Act, 2009.

The incident, which came to light after a purported video by the victim surfaced online, has sparked outrage and calls for a high-level probe. This tragic event underscores the persistent issues of ragging and sexual harassment in educational institutions and highlights the application of the newly enacted BNS in such cases.

Key Facts

19-year-old student died in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh

Alleged ragging and sexual assault

Three women students booked for ragging and voluntarily causing hurt

Professor booked for sexual harassment

FIR registered under Sections 75, 115(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 3 of Himachal Pradesh Ragging Act, 2009

Incident occurred on September 18, death on December 26

UPSC Exam Angles

Analysis of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and its key provisions related to offenses against the body and sexual offenses.

Understanding the legal framework for preventing ragging in India, including state acts and UGC regulations.

Social issues concerning campus safety, gender-based violence, power dynamics, and mental health in educational institutions.

Role of educational institutions, administration, and faculty in ensuring a safe and inclusive environment.

Constitutional provisions related to fundamental rights (e.g., Article 21, Article 15) in the context of student safety.

Visual Insights

Location of Ragging & Sexual Assault Incident: Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh

This map highlights the geographical context of the tragic incident, pinpointing Dharamshala within Himachal Pradesh. Understanding the location helps contextualize local governance and specific state laws like the Himachal Pradesh Educational Institution (Prohibition of) Ragging Act, 2009.

Loading interactive map...

📍Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh

Timeline of Himachal Ragging-Sexual Assault Case & BNS Context

This timeline outlines the immediate sequence of events related to the tragic incident in Dharamshala and places it in the context of the newly implemented Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). It highlights the swift legal action under the new framework.

The incident serves as an early and significant test case for the application of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in serious offenses like sexual harassment and voluntarily causing hurt, demonstrating its immediate relevance in the criminal justice system post-July 2024.

July 1, 2024Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) comes into effect across India, replacing the IPC.
December 202519-year-old student in Dharamshala allegedly subjected to ragging and sexual assault, leading to death.
December 2025Victim's purported video detailing the ordeal surfaces online, sparking outrage.
January 2026FIR registered against three women students (ragging, voluntarily causing hurt) and a professor (sexual harassment).
January 2026Charges filed under BNS Sections 75 (sexual harassment), 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), and HP Ragging Act, 2009.

More Information

Background

Ragging and sexual harassment in educational institutions have been persistent issues in India, often leading to severe physical and psychological trauma, and in tragic cases, even death. Historically, the legal framework primarily relied on the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and specific state anti-ragging laws, alongside University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations. The Supreme Court's intervention, particularly through the Raghavan Committee recommendations, led to stricter guidelines and institutional responsibilities.

Latest Developments

The recent incident in Himachal Pradesh highlights the continued prevalence of these issues. It is significant because it involves the application of the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaces the IPC.

The booking of students for ragging and voluntarily causing hurt under BNS and a state-specific anti-ragging act, along with a professor for sexual harassment under BNS, underscores the evolving legal landscape and the serious implications for offenders. The incident has reignited calls for stronger enforcement and preventive measures.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. With reference to the legal framework concerning ragging and sexual harassment in educational institutions in India, consider the following statements: 1. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for the first time explicitly defines and criminalizes 'sexual harassment' as an offense. 2. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has statutory powers to enforce anti-ragging regulations, including imposing penalties on non-compliant institutions. 3. The Supreme Court's directives on anti-ragging measures are primarily based on the recommendations of the Raghavan Committee. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A.1 and 2 only
B.2 and 3 only
C.1 and 3 only
D.1, 2 and 3

Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is incorrect. While BNS includes provisions for sexual harassment (e.g., Section 75 mentioned in the news), 'sexual harassment' was explicitly defined and criminalized in India through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, following the Justice Verma Committee recommendations, which amended the IPC. BNS carries forward and refines these provisions, but it's not the 'first time'. Statement 2 is correct. The UGC (Prevention and Prohibition of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2009, framed under the UGC Act, 1956, provide statutory backing for anti-ragging measures and empower UGC to take action against institutions. Statement 3 is correct. The Supreme Court, in the Vishwa Jagriti Mission case (2007), constituted the R.K. Raghavan Committee, whose recommendations formed the basis for comprehensive anti-ragging guidelines and subsequent UGC regulations.

2. Consider the following statements regarding the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023: 1. It repeals and replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, aiming to modernize India's criminal justice system. 2. The BNS introduces 'community service' as a new form of punishment for certain offenses. 3. It mandates the use of forensic investigation for offenses punishable with imprisonment of seven years or more. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A.1 only
B.2 and 3 only
C.1 and 2 only
D.1, 2 and 3

Show Answer

Answer: D

Statement 1 is correct. The BNS, along with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), replaces the IPC, CrPC, and Indian Evidence Act respectively, with the objective of modernizing and streamlining the criminal justice system. Statement 2 is correct. BNS introduces community service as a new form of punishment, particularly for petty offenses, aiming at reformative justice. Statement 3 is correct. A significant feature of the BNS is the mandatory use of forensic investigation for offenses punishable with imprisonment of seven years or more, to enhance conviction rates and ensure scientific evidence.

3. Which of the following statements is NOT correct regarding the measures to combat ragging in Indian educational institutions?

A.The UGC (Prevention and Prohibition of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2009, are legally binding on all higher educational institutions. B) Educational institutions are mandated to constitute an Anti-Ragging Committee and an Anti-Ragging Squad. C) The definition of ragging under most state laws and UGC regulations primarily focuses on physical harm and excludes psychological torment.
B.The Supreme Court has emphasized the responsibility of institutional heads to prevent ragging and take prompt action against offenders.

Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement C is NOT correct. The definition of ragging under the UGC Regulations, 2009, and most state anti-ragging laws is very broad and explicitly includes not only physical harm but also psychological torment, mental agony, humiliation, intimidation, and any act that causes or is likely to cause distress to a student. The aim is to cover all forms of harassment and abuse. Statements A, B, and D are correct. The UGC regulations are statutory and binding. Institutions are indeed mandated to form anti-ragging bodies. The Supreme Court has consistently held institutional heads accountable for preventing ragging.