For this article:

23 Dec 2025·Source: The Hindu
2 min
Polity & GovernanceSocial IssuesPolity & GovernanceEDITORIAL

Manipur's Endless Cycle of Violence: A Call for Lasting Peace

Manipur's ethnic violence persists, demanding urgent, comprehensive solutions beyond temporary measures.

Manipur's Endless Cycle of Violence: A Call for Lasting Peace

Photo by Elist Nguyen

Editorial Analysis

The author argues that the Manipur crisis is a profound failure of governance, stemming from a lack of political will to address deep-seated ethnic grievances and land disputes, rather than just a law and order problem. The current approach is seen as inadequate and exacerbating the conflict.

Main Arguments:

  1. The violence is not merely a law and order issue but a complex ethnic conflict rooted in historical grievances, land disputes, and demographic anxieties between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities.
  2. Both the state and central governments have failed to restore lasting peace, with their interventions being temporary and lacking a comprehensive political solution.
  3. The continued violence, despite central forces deployment, indicates a deeper governance crisis and a lack of trust among communities.
  4. The conflict has led to significant displacement, loss of life, and destruction of property, creating a humanitarian crisis.

Conclusion

The editorial concludes that a lasting solution for Manipur requires a comprehensive political approach that addresses the root causes of the conflict, rebuilds trust between communities, and ensures effective governance, rather than relying on piecemeal security measures.

Policy Implications

The editorial implies a need for new policies on ethnic reconciliation, land dispute resolution, and a more robust, politically sensitive approach to internal security in the Northeast.

The editorial "Unrest Unlimited" critically examines the persistent ethnic violence in Manipur, highlighting the failure of both state and central governments to restore lasting peace. Despite the deployment of security forces and various interventions, the conflict between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities continues, marked by killings, arson, and displacement.

The author argues that the current approach, focused on temporary measures and a lack of political will, has exacerbated the crisis. The piece emphasizes the deep-seated historical grievances, land disputes, and demographic anxieties fueling the conflict, calling for a comprehensive political solution that addresses the root causes rather than just managing symptoms.

Key Facts

1.

Ethnic violence between Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities in Manipur

2.

Continued killings, arson, and displacement

3.

Criticism of state and central government's handling of the crisis

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

Federalism and Centre-State relations in managing internal security and ethnic conflicts.

2.

Constitutional provisions related to special status for states (e.g., Article 371C for Manipur) and tribal administration (e.g., Sixth Schedule, though not directly applicable to all of Manipur).

3.

Land reforms, land rights, and their intersection with ethnic identity and conflict.

4.

Internal security challenges, role of security forces, and human rights implications.

5.

Governance failures, political will, and the importance of comprehensive political solutions.

6.

Demographic changes, migration, and their impact on social harmony and resource competition.

Visual Insights

Manipur Ethnic Conflict: Key Regions and Affected Areas (2023-2025)

This map illustrates the geographical spread of the ongoing ethnic violence in Manipur, highlighting districts predominantly affected by clashes, arson, and displacement between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities. It provides a crucial spatial understanding of the conflict's impact.

Loading interactive map...

📍Imphal West📍Churachandpur📍Kangpokpi📍Moreh

Manipur Ethnic Violence: Key Events and Government Interventions (2023-2025)

This timeline outlines the major events, escalations, and government responses related to the ethnic conflict in Manipur, from its initial outbreak in May 2023 to the ongoing situation in late 2025. It highlights the persistent nature of the violence despite various interventions.

The current conflict in Manipur is rooted in historical grievances over land, resources, and identity, exacerbated by demographic shifts and political manipulation. Tensions between the Meitei community (predominantly in the valley) and Kuki-Zo tribes (in the hills) have simmered for decades, periodically erupting into violence. The demand for Scheduled Tribe status for Meiteis and concerns over illegal immigration from Myanmar are recent triggers, alongside issues of drug trafficking and poppy cultivation.

  • May 2023Tribal Solidarity March and initial clashes erupt in Churachandpur, spreading across Manipur after HC order on Meitei ST status.
  • June 2023Union Home Minister visits Manipur, announces peace committee, relief measures, and deployment of additional security forces.
  • July 2023Violence continues, reports of widespread arson, killings, and displacement. Supreme Court intervenes, expresses concern over law and order.
  • August 2023Parliamentary debate on Manipur, no-confidence motion against government. Centre appoints former CJI-led committee to probe violence.
  • Late 2023Sporadic violence, blockades, and counter-blockades persist. Calls for separate administration for Kuki-Zo areas intensify.
  • Early 2024Continued deployment of CAPFs. Efforts to disarm militants and recover looted weapons face challenges. Humanitarian crisis deepens.
  • Mid 2024Reports of renewed clashes in peripheral areas, targeting of security forces. Political dialogue remains stalled.
  • Late 2024Central government initiates 'Area Domination' operations. Focus on border security to prevent arms smuggling and infiltration.
  • Early 2025Continued stalemate, with communities remaining segregated. Calls for a comprehensive political solution grow louder amidst persistent low-intensity violence.
  • Dec 2025Manipur's 'endless cycle of violence' persists, highlighting failure of current strategies to restore lasting peace and address root causes.
More Information

Background

Manipur has a history of ethnic tensions, insurgency, and inter-community conflicts, particularly between the dominant Meitei community in the valley and various Kuki-Zo and Naga tribes in the hill districts. Historical grievances, land ownership patterns, demographic shifts, and demands for Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for Meiteis have fueled these conflicts.

Latest Developments

The recent wave of violence, starting in May 2023, primarily between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities, has led to widespread killings, arson, displacement, and a breakdown of law and order. The editorial highlights the failure of both state and central governments to restore lasting peace, attributing it to temporary measures, a lack of political will, and an inability to address the deep-seated root causes.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. With reference to the constitutional provisions related to Manipur, consider the following statements: 1. Article 371C of the Constitution provides for a Committee of the Manipur Legislative Assembly consisting of members elected from the Hill Areas. 2. The President is empowered to make an order for the administration of tribal areas in Manipur under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. 3. Existing state laws in Manipur prohibit the transfer of land from tribals to non-tribals in the Hill Areas, which is a key point of contention in the ongoing conflict. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 only
  • B.1 and 3 only
  • C.2 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is correct. Article 371C makes special provisions with respect to the State of Manipur, including the formation of a Committee of the Legislative Assembly consisting of members elected from the Hill Areas. Statement 2 is incorrect. The Sixth Schedule applies to the tribal areas in the states of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. While Manipur has tribal areas and special provisions under Article 371C, its administration is not directly under the Sixth Schedule. Statement 3 is correct. Laws like the Manipur Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960, have provisions restricting land transfer in hill areas, which is a significant factor in the Meitei-Kuki-Zo conflict, as Meiteis (who are largely non-tribal) cannot buy land in tribal hill areas, while tribals can buy land in the valley.

2. In the context of managing internal security and ethnic conflicts in India, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. 'Public Order' and 'Police' are subjects primarily listed under the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. 2. The Union Government's power to deploy Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) in a state for maintaining law and order is absolute and does not require the state government's consent. 3. Article 355 of the Constitution imposes a duty on the Union to protect every State against external aggression and internal disturbance. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • A.1 only
  • B.1 and 2 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.2 and 3 only
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement 1 is correct. 'Public Order' (Entry 1) and 'Police' (Entry 2) are indeed subjects primarily listed under the State List (List II) of the Seventh Schedule. Statement 2 is incorrect. While the Union Government can deploy CAPFs, especially for its own purposes or in aid of civil power, the general principle is that deployment for maintaining law and order within a state requires the state government's consent. There are legal nuances and exceptions, but the statement that it is 'absolute' and 'does not require consent' is too strong and generally incorrect in the spirit of federalism regarding 'public order'. Statement 3 is correct. Article 355 states: 'It shall be the duty of the Union to protect every State against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every State is carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.' This article provides the constitutional basis for central intervention in states facing internal disturbances.

GKSolverToday's News