For this article:

6 Dec 2025·Source: The Indian Express
3 min
Polity & GovernanceEconomyInternational RelationsNEWS

India and Russia Prioritize Joint Manufacturing of Defence Spares, Emphasizing Make in India

India and Russia agree to boost joint manufacturing of spare parts for Russian-origin defence equipment, aligning with Make in India.

India and Russia Prioritize Joint Manufacturing of Defence Spares, Emphasizing Make in India

Photo by Vizag Explore

India and Russia have agreed to significantly promote joint manufacturing of spare parts, components, and aggregates for Russian-origin arms and defence equipment within India. This initiative, which aligns with India's 'Make in India' programme, involves technology transfer and the establishment of joint ventures. The goal is to meet the needs of the Indian Armed Forces and also enable exports to mutually friendly third countries.

While no new defence deals were announced during the recent Modi-Putin talks, this focus on indigenous production of spares is crucial for India's self-reliance in defence. It addresses the long-standing issue of dependence on foreign suppliers for maintenance and upgrades of its substantial Russian-origin arsenal.

Key Facts

1.

Agreement to promote joint manufacturing of spare parts for Russian-origin defence equipment.

2.

Aligns with India's 'Make in India' programme.

3.

Involves technology transfer and joint ventures.

4.

Aims to meet Indian Armed Forces' needs and enable exports.

5.

No new defence deals announced during Modi-Putin talks.

6.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh met Russian Defence Minister Andrey Belousov.

UPSC Exam Angles

1.

Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) and its evolution

2.

Strategic Partnership Model in defence manufacturing

3.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy in defence

4.

India-Russia strategic relations and their evolution

5.

Impact of geopolitical shifts on defence procurement

6.

Challenges and opportunities for 'Make in India' in defence

7.

Role of private sector and MSMEs in defence production

Visual Insights

India-Russia Defence Cooperation: A Strategic Overview

This map highlights India and Russia, the two key nations involved in the joint manufacturing of defence spares. It underscores the geographical context of their 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership' and the importance of this collaboration for India's defence self-reliance.

Loading interactive map...

📍India📍Russia

Evolution of India-Russia Defence Cooperation & Indigenization Push

This timeline illustrates the key milestones in India's defence relationship with Russia and the parallel evolution of India's 'Make in India' and indigenization policies, culminating in the current focus on joint manufacturing of spares.

India's defence relationship with Russia (and previously the Soviet Union) has been a cornerstone of its strategic autonomy. Over decades, it has evolved from a buyer-seller relationship to one focused on joint production and technology transfer, aligning with India's growing ambition for self-reliance in defence, formalized through initiatives like 'Make in India' and 'Atmanirbhar Bharat'.

  • 1960s-1990sSoviet Union as India's primary defence supplier (Cold War era)
  • 2000Declaration on India-Russia Strategic Partnership
  • 2010Partnership elevated to 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership'
  • 2014Launch of 'Make in India' initiative by PM Modi, with defence as a key sector
  • 2016Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 introduced, emphasizing 'Make' categories and indigenous content
  • 2018India signs S-400 Triumf air defence system deal with Russia
  • 2020Launch of 'Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan' (Self-Reliant India Campaign); Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020 replaces DPP 2016, with stronger indigenization focus
  • 2020-PresentMultiple 'Positive Indigenisation Lists' for defence items notified, banning their import
  • 2021Indo-Russian Rifles Pvt. Ltd. (IRRPL) begins production of AK-203 assault rifles in India
  • Current NewsIndia and Russia prioritize joint manufacturing of defence spares, emphasizing 'Make in India' and technology transfer
More Information

Background

India has historically been one of the world's largest importers of defence equipment, with a significant portion of its arsenal being of Russian/Soviet origin. This dependence has often led to challenges in terms of spare parts availability, maintenance, and technology upgrades, impacting military readiness and strategic autonomy. The 'Make in India' initiative, particularly in the defence sector, and the broader 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' vision, aim to reduce this reliance by promoting indigenous manufacturing, technology transfer, and private sector participation.

Latest Developments

The recent agreement between India and Russia to prioritize joint manufacturing of defence spares, components, and aggregates within India marks a significant step towards deepening defence industrial cooperation. This initiative, which includes technology transfer and the establishment of joint ventures, is designed to meet the needs of the Indian Armed Forces and also facilitate exports to mutually friendly third countries. It underscores a shift from a buyer-seller relationship to a co-development and co-production model, crucial for India's self-reliance in defence.

Practice Questions (MCQs)

1. Consider the following statements regarding the recent India-Russia agreement on defence manufacturing: 1. The agreement primarily focuses on joint manufacturing of new, advanced defence platforms rather than spare parts. 2. A key objective is to enable exports of indigenously produced spares to mutually friendly third countries. 3. The initiative aligns with India's 'Make in India' programme and involves technology transfer. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: B

Statement 1 is incorrect. The news explicitly states that the agreement prioritizes joint manufacturing of 'spare parts, components, and aggregates' for Russian-origin arms, not primarily new defence platforms. Statements 2 and 3 are correct as per the news summary, highlighting export potential and alignment with 'Make in India' through technology transfer.

2. With reference to India's defence acquisition and production policies, consider the following statements: 1. The 'Strategic Partnership Model' under the Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) aims to promote indigenous manufacturing of major defence platforms by Indian private sector companies. 2. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the defence manufacturing sector in India is currently permitted up to 100% through the automatic route for all sub-sectors. 3. The 'iDEX' initiative is designed to foster innovation and technology development in the defence and aerospace sector by engaging MSMEs, startups, and individual innovators. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • A.1 and 2 only
  • B.2 and 3 only
  • C.1 and 3 only
  • D.1, 2 and 3
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statement 1 is correct. The Strategic Partnership Model (SPM) was introduced to boost indigenous manufacturing of high-tech defence platforms by selecting Indian private sector companies as Strategic Partners. Statement 2 is incorrect. While FDI in defence manufacturing is permitted up to 100%, it is 74% through the automatic route and beyond 74% through the government route, requiring specific conditions and government approval. It is not 100% automatic for all sub-sectors. Statement 3 is correct. Innovations for Defence Excellence (iDEX) is indeed a flagship initiative by the Ministry of Defence to create an ecosystem to foster innovation and technology development in defence and aerospace by engaging various stakeholders.

3. Assertion (A): India has historically maintained a significant dependence on Russian-origin defence equipment and technology. Reason (R): Russia has consistently been a reliable supplier of advanced military hardware and has shown willingness for technology transfer, particularly when compared to Western nations in the past. In the context of the above two statements, which one of the following is correct?

  • A.Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
  • B.Both A and R are true but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.
  • C.A is true but R is false.
  • D.A is false but R is true.
Show Answer

Answer: A

Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true. India's defence forces have a substantial inventory of Russian-origin equipment, making Russia a historically significant defence partner. Reason (R) correctly explains this dependence: during the Cold War and even post-Cold War, Russia (and previously the Soviet Union) offered advanced military technology and was more amenable to technology transfer and licensed production arrangements (e.g., MiG aircraft, Sukhoi-30MKI, BrahMos missile) compared to many Western nations, which often had stricter export controls or higher costs. This reliability and willingness for technology sharing cemented the defence relationship.

4. Which of the following is NOT a stated objective or feature of India's 'Make in India' initiative in the defence sector?

  • A.Reducing India's defence import bill and achieving self-reliance in critical defence technologies.
  • B.Promoting the establishment of a robust defence industrial base involving both public and private sectors.
  • C.Mandating a minimum of 50% indigenous content in all defence procurements, irrespective of the category.
  • D.Encouraging foreign original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to set up manufacturing facilities in India through joint ventures or technology transfer.
Show Answer

Answer: C

Statements A, B, and D are all core objectives or features of the 'Make in India' initiative in the defence sector. The goal is indeed to reduce imports, build a strong domestic industrial base (public and private), and attract foreign OEMs for technology transfer. However, Statement C is incorrect. While indigenization is a key focus, there is no blanket mandate for a minimum of 50% indigenous content in *all* defence procurements irrespective of category. Indigenous content requirements vary significantly based on the specific procurement category (e.g., 'Buy Indian - IDDM', 'Buy (Indian)', 'Buy and Make (Indian)', 'Make') and the nature of the equipment, with some categories having higher or lower thresholds, and some being aspirational rather than mandatory across the board.

Source Articles

GKSolverToday's News