Electoral Roll Revision Concerns - January 2026
Controversies surrounding electoral roll revisions in Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal, including allegations of voter deletion and flawed processes.
Controversies surrounding electoral roll revisions in Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal, including allegations of voter deletion and flawed processes.
In January 2026, concerns arose regarding the revision of electoral rolls in Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal, with Uttar Pradesh seeing significant voter deletions and West Bengal's Chief Minister alleging flaws in the SIR process. The Election Commission of India (ECI) attributed deletions to deaths, migration, and duplicate registrations. Allegations included the lack of acknowledgment for submitted documents and the deletion of voters without proper hearings, raising concerns about potential disenfranchisement. The ECI issued notices for verification in Bengal, while UP data suggested similar deletion rates in Muslim-majority areas. The controversies highlight the importance of transparent and accurate electoral roll revisions to ensure fair and inclusive elections. Further adding to the concerns, the Rajasthan Assembly witnessed an uproar over alleged voter roll irregularities, with the opposition Congress claiming misuse of Form-7 to delete eligible voters.
The Rajasthan Assembly saw an uproar over alleged voter roll irregularities, with the opposition Congress claiming misuse of Form-7 to delete eligible voters.
The Election Commission issued notices to electors in Bengal with over six siblings as part of verification efforts, and Mamata Banerjee criticized the EC for allegedly deleting 54 lakh voters without proper hearings.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee wrote to the Chief Election Commissioner alleging flaws in the SIR process, while data from UP suggested that voter deletions in Muslim-majority areas were similar to the rest of the state.
Uttar Pradesh's draft electoral rolls revealed high voter deletion rates, with Lucknow recording the highest at 30%. The Special Summary Revision (SIR) 2.0 indicated that 18.7% of names were removed in UP, attributed to deaths, migration, and multiple registrations.
Exam Notes
Constitutional articles, acts & key terms
Practice Questions
30 MCQs, 9 Mains questions