Three Kashmiris Abroad Booked Under UAPA for Alleged Secessionist Propaganda
Three Kashmiris, including a US-based doctor, booked under UAPA for alleged secessionist propaganda.
Photo by Wonderlane
Three Kashmiris, including a US-based doctor and a Bangladesh-based journalist, have been booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in Jammu and Kashmir. They are accused of allegedly spreading propaganda against India and promoting secessionism.
This action highlights the government's stringent approach to combating activities deemed detrimental to national security, even when perpetrated by individuals residing abroad. The case reignites debates surrounding the balance between freedom of speech and national security, particularly concerning the application of UAPA.
मुख्य तथ्य
3 Kashmiris booked under UAPA
Includes a US-based doctor and Bangladesh-based journalist
Accused of spreading propaganda and promoting secessionism
UPSC परीक्षा के दृष्टिकोण
Constitutional provisions related to Fundamental Rights (Article 19) and their reasonable restrictions.
The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) – its key provisions, amendments, and implications.
National Security laws and their interface with civil liberties and human rights.
Extraterritorial application of Indian laws to citizens abroad.
Federalism and law enforcement in sensitive regions like Jammu & Kashmir.
Judicial review of anti-terror laws and the role of the judiciary.
दृश्य सामग्री
Global Nexus of Alleged Secessionist Propaganda & UAPA Application
This map illustrates the geographic spread of individuals booked under UAPA for alleged secessionist propaganda, highlighting the cross-border nature of such activities and the extraterritorial reach of India's anti-terrorism law. It shows the origin of the alleged propaganda's impact (Jammu & Kashmir) and the locations of the accused.
Loading interactive map...
Key Statistics on UAPA Application in India (2021-2025)
This dashboard presents key statistics related to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), highlighting trends in cases, arrests, and conviction rates. It reflects the stringent nature of the law and ongoing debates about its implementation. Data for 2024 and 2025 are estimates based on observed trends.
- UAPA Cases Registered
- 1050+Stable
- Persons Arrested Under UAPA
- 1800+Stable
- UAPA Conviction Rate
- 3-5%Stable
- Average Pre-Trial Detention
- 2+ YearsStable
Reflects continued use of UAPA against alleged unlawful activities and terrorism. Numbers have remained significant over recent years.
Indicates the government's proactive approach in apprehending individuals suspected of unlawful activities. Often includes multiple arrests per case.
Historically low conviction rate, raising concerns about prolonged detentions and the burden of proof. This is a major point of debate.
Stringent bail conditions and extended detention periods (up to 180 days without charge) contribute to long pre-trial periods, impacting fundamental rights.
और जानकारी
पृष्ठभूमि
The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967, is India's primary anti-terrorism law. It was originally enacted to deal with activities directed against the sovereignty and integrity of India. Over the years, it has been amended multiple times, most significantly in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2019, to include provisions for combating terrorism and allowing the designation of individuals as terrorists.
The Act grants significant powers to the state, including extended detention periods and stringent bail conditions, aimed at preventing and punishing unlawful activities and terrorist acts. Its application has often sparked debates regarding its impact on civil liberties and fundamental rights.
नवीनतम घटनाक्रम
बहुविकल्पीय प्रश्न (MCQ)
1. Consider the following statements regarding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967: 1. The Act allows the Central Government to designate an individual as a terrorist. 2. It applies to Indian citizens even for offenses committed outside India. 3. The definition of 'unlawful activity' under the Act includes any action intended to cause disaffection against India. 4. Bail under UAPA is generally more stringent than under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Which of the statements given above are correct?
उत्तर देखें
सही उत्तर: D
Statement 1 is correct: The 2019 amendment to UAPA empowered the Central Government to designate individuals as terrorists. Statement 2 is correct: Section 1(2) of UAPA explicitly states that it applies to citizens of India outside India. Statement 3 is correct: Section 2(o) of UAPA defines 'unlawful activity' broadly to include any action intended to cause disaffection against India. Statement 4 is correct: Section 43D(5) of UAPA imposes stringent conditions for bail, making it difficult for the accused to secure release if the court is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against such person is prima facie true. This is a significant departure from the general bail provisions under CrPC.
2. In the context of freedom of speech and expression in India, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees absolute freedom of speech and expression to all citizens. 2. The grounds for imposing reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(2) are exhaustive. 3. Promoting secessionism is a ground for reasonable restriction on freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(2). Select the correct answer using the code given below:
उत्तर देखें
सही उत्तर: B
Statement 1 is incorrect: Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom of speech and expression, but it is not absolute. It is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). Statement 2 is correct: Article 19(2) lists specific and exhaustive grounds for reasonable restrictions, such as the sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence. Statement 3 is correct: Promoting secessionism directly threatens the 'sovereignty and integrity of India', which is one of the explicit grounds for reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2).
3. Which of the following principles govern the extraterritorial application of Indian criminal laws to Indian citizens? 1. Nationality Principle: Indian laws apply to Indian citizens for offenses committed anywhere in the world. 2. Territorial Principle: Indian laws apply to offenses committed within the territory of India, irrespective of the nationality of the offender. 3. Protective Principle: Indian laws apply to offenses committed abroad by anyone, if the offense harms India's national security or vital interests. 4. Universality Principle: Indian laws apply to certain heinous crimes (e.g., piracy, war crimes) irrespective of where they are committed or the nationality of the offender. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
उत्तर देखें
सही उत्तर: D
All four principles are recognized in international criminal law and are, to varying degrees, incorporated into Indian criminal jurisprudence. 1. Nationality Principle: Codified in Section 4 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which states that Indian laws apply to any offense committed by any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India. This is directly relevant to the news. 2. Territorial Principle: This is the most common principle, where a state has jurisdiction over all offenses committed within its territory. Section 2 of IPC reflects this. 3. Protective Principle: While not explicitly codified as a standalone principle in IPC, its essence is reflected in laws like UAPA, which target acts detrimental to India's security, even if committed abroad by non-citizens (though the question focuses on citizens, the principle itself is broader). 4. Universality Principle: India, as a signatory to various international conventions, recognizes universal jurisdiction for certain crimes like piracy, war crimes, and terrorism, allowing it to prosecute offenders irrespective of nationality or place of crime.
Source Articles
3 Kashmiris based in US, Germany booked in J-K for ‘weaponising’ social media, told to appear before Srinagar court
‘They’ve known us since we joined college’ – In Dehradun, shocked Kashmiri students leave campus following threats & heckling | India News - The Indian Express
India News: Latest India News, Today Breaking News Headlines from India | The Indian Express
The Kashmir Files to re-release in theatres ahead of Cinema Lovers Day, tickets for Rs 99 | Bollywood News - The Indian Express
Latest News on Kashmir: Get Kashmir News Updates along with Photos, Videos and Latest News Headlines | The Indian Express
