What is Article 142 of the Constitution?
Historical Background
Key Points
12 points- 1.
Complete Justice is the core principle. The Supreme Court can pass any order necessary to do complete justice in a case. This power is not limited by existing laws or procedures. For example, in the Bhopal Gas Tragedy case, the Supreme Court used Article 142 to provide compensation to the victims, even though the existing laws were inadequate.
- 2.
The Supreme Court's power under Article 142 is discretionary. This means the court decides when and how to use this power. It is not a right that parties can demand. The court must exercise this power judiciously, considering the facts and circumstances of each case.
- 3.
Override of Laws is a significant aspect. The Supreme Court can issue orders that may override existing laws if necessary to achieve complete justice. However, this power is not absolute. The court cannot violate fundamental rights or the basic structure of the Constitution.
- 4.
Scope Limitation exists. While Article 142 grants broad powers, the Supreme Court has clarified that it cannot use this article to create new laws. Its role is to interpret and apply existing laws, not to legislate.
- 5.
Enforcement Power is inherent. Orders passed under Article 142 are directly enforceable. This means they do not require further legislative action or executive orders to be implemented. This ensures quick and effective justice.
- 6.
Transfer of Cases is facilitated. The Supreme Court can use Article 142 to transfer cases from one court to another, even if the existing laws do not allow such transfer. This is often done to ensure a fair trial or to expedite the resolution of a case.
- 7.
Environmental Protection has been aided. The Supreme Court has used Article 142 in several cases related to environmental protection. For example, it has issued orders to close polluting industries and to protect forests, even when these orders went beyond existing environmental laws.
- 8.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is often linked. Article 142 is frequently invoked in PIL cases, where the court is addressing issues of public importance. This allows the court to take proactive steps to protect the rights of citizens and to promote social justice.
- 9.
Limitations on Financial Powers are in place. While the Supreme Court can order compensation or other financial remedies under Article 142, it cannot impose taxes or create new financial obligations that are not authorized by law.
- 10.
Judicial Restraint is expected. The Supreme Court is expected to exercise judicial restraint when using Article 142. This means it should only use this power in exceptional circumstances and should avoid interfering with the functions of the other branches of government.
- 11.
Impact on Fundamental Rights is a key consideration. The Supreme Court cannot use Article 142 to violate fundamental rights guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution. This ensures that the pursuit of complete justice does not come at the expense of individual liberties.
- 12.
Relation to Other Articles is important. Article 142 must be read in conjunction with other articles of the Constitution, such as Article 32 (Right to Constitutional Remedies) and Article 141 (Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts). This ensures a harmonious interpretation of the Constitution.
Recent Developments
5 developmentsIn 2020, the Supreme Court used Article 142 to direct the central government to provide financial assistance to lawyers facing economic hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2019, the Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to ensure the demolition of illegal structures around the Taj Mahal to protect the monument from pollution.
In 2017, the Supreme Court used Article 142 to ban the sale of liquor along national and state highways to reduce road accidents.
In 2021, the Supreme Court used Article 142 to facilitate the adoption of children orphaned during the COVID-19 pandemic, streamlining the legal process and ensuring their welfare.
In February 2026, the Supreme Court permitted the deployment of judicial officers from Odisha and Jharkhand to complete the adjudication of claims and objections of persons included in the “logical discrepancy/unmapped category” during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal, citing a 'trust deficit' between the state government and the Election Commission of India.
This Concept in News
2 topicsSupreme Court Upholds Aadhaar's Validity as Identity Proof in Electoral Rolls
25 Feb 2026The news surrounding the Supreme Court's intervention in the West Bengal electoral process using Article 142 underscores the judiciary's role as a guardian of electoral integrity. This situation highlights the 'complete justice' aspect of Article 142, as the Court sought to ensure that no eligible voter is disenfranchised due to procedural delays or discrepancies. The news also reveals a potential tension between the Election Commission's mandate to conduct elections efficiently and the Court's responsibility to uphold individual rights. This intervention serves as a reminder that the application of constitutional provisions is not always straightforward and often requires a balancing of competing interests. Understanding Article 142 is crucial for analyzing this news because it provides the legal basis for the Supreme Court's actions and sheds light on the broader debate about the judiciary's role in safeguarding democracy.
Supreme Court Permits Odisha and Jharkhand Judges to Assist Bengal SIR
25 Feb 2026This news underscores the practical application of Article 142 in resolving complex governance issues. It demonstrates the Supreme Court's role as a guardian of the electoral process, willing to intervene when necessary to uphold fairness and transparency. The situation in West Bengal, characterized by a 'trust deficit,' highlights the importance of Article 142 in ensuring that constitutional functions are carried out effectively, even when relationships between different bodies are strained. This news reinforces the understanding that Article 142 is not just a theoretical provision but a tool used to address real-world challenges and maintain the integrity of democratic processes. Understanding Article 142 is crucial for analyzing the Supreme Court's role in safeguarding constitutional values and resolving disputes between different levels of government.
