3 minConstitutional Provision
Constitutional Provision

Expulsion of a Member of Parliament

What is Expulsion of a Member of Parliament?

Expulsion of a Member of Parliament (MP) means removing them from their position as a member of either the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). This is a severe punishment. It happens when an MP is found guilty of serious misconduct or unethical behavior. The power to expel rests with the respective House. A motion needs to be passed by a majority vote. Once expelled, the MP's seat becomes vacant. They are disqualified from being a member. The expulsion is different from suspension. Suspension is temporary. Expulsion is permanent. Article 101 and Article 102 of the Constitution deal with vacation of seats and disqualifications. Expulsion aims to maintain the dignity and integrity of the Parliament.

Historical Background

The concept of expulsion has been present since the beginning of the Indian Parliament. It is based on parliamentary practices in other countries, like the UK. The purpose is to ensure that members behave ethically and maintain the dignity of the House. There have been instances of expulsion in the past. These cases usually involved serious misconduct. For example, accepting bribes or engaging in activities that bring disrepute to the Parliament. The rules and procedures for expulsion are defined in the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of both Houses. These rules have been amended over time to clarify the process. There is ongoing debate about the fairness and proportionality of expulsion as a punishment. Some argue it should be used sparingly. Others believe it is necessary to maintain standards. The power of expulsion has been used several times since 1950.

Key Points

12 points
  • 1.

    Expulsion is a power vested in each House of Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha).

  • 2.

    The process typically begins with a motion moved by a member, alleging misconduct by another member.

  • 3.

    The motion is debated in the House, and the member facing expulsion has the right to defend themselves.

  • 4.

    A vote is taken on the motion. A majority vote is usually required for expulsion.

  • 5.

    If the motion passes, the member is expelled from the House, and their seat becomes vacant.

  • 6.

    The expelled member is disqualified from being a member of Parliament until the next election or as specified by law.

  • 7.

    The grounds for expulsion are not explicitly defined in the Constitution. They are based on precedents and parliamentary conventions.

  • 8.

    Common grounds for expulsion include bribery, corruption, unethical conduct, and bringing disrepute to the House.

  • 9.

    The Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or the Chairman (in Rajya Sabha) plays a crucial role in overseeing the expulsion process.

  • 10.

    Judicial review of expulsion is limited, but courts can examine if the process followed was fair and in accordance with the rules.

  • 11.

    Expulsion differs from suspension. Suspension is a temporary removal, while expulsion is a permanent removal.

  • 12.

    Article 102 of the Constitution specifies disqualifications for being a member of either House. Expulsion can lead to disqualification.

Visual Insights

Evolution of Expulsion Procedures in Indian Parliament

Key events and developments in the history of expulsion of MPs in India.

The power to expel MPs has been used sparingly but serves as a check on unethical conduct. The process has evolved over time to ensure fairness and due process.

  • 1950First Rules of Procedure framed for Indian Parliament.
  • 1951H.G. Mudgal case: First instance of expulsion recommendation (accepted resignation instead).
  • 2005Cash-for-query scam: Several MPs expelled for accepting bribes.
  • 2006Parliament amended rules to clarify expulsion process.
  • 2020-2024Increased scrutiny of MPs' conduct and ethical standards.
  • 2026Nishikant Dubey gives notice for motion seeking Rahul Gandhi's expulsion.

Expulsion vs. Suspension of a Member of Parliament

A comparison of the key differences between expulsion and suspension of a Member of Parliament.

FeatureExpulsionSuspension
DurationPermanent removalTemporary removal
EffectSeat becomes vacantMember is temporarily barred from attending sessions
GroundsSerious misconduct, unethical behaviorDisorderly conduct, violation of rules
Legal BasisRules of Procedure and Conduct of BusinessRules of Procedure and Conduct of Business
Impact on MembershipDisqualification from being a memberNo impact on membership after suspension period

Recent Developments

6 developments

Increased scrutiny of MPs' conduct in recent years (2020-2024).

Debates on the ethical standards expected of parliamentarians.

Growing public awareness of parliamentary proceedings and accountability.

Instances of suspension of MPs for unruly behavior, leading to discussions about expulsion.

Calls for clearer guidelines on what constitutes grounds for expulsion.

The current news event involving Rahul Gandhi and the call for his expulsion (2024).

This Concept in News

1 topics

Frequently Asked Questions

12
1. What is the expulsion of a Member of Parliament (MP) and what is its constitutional basis?

Expulsion of an MP means removing them from their position in the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha due to serious misconduct or unethical behavior. The constitutional basis lies in the powers of each House to regulate its own proceedings and maintain discipline, as indicated by Article 101 and Article 102, which deal with vacation of seats.

Exam Tip

Remember that expulsion is a power of each House to maintain its dignity and ethical standards.

2. What are the key provisions related to the expulsion of a Member of Parliament?

The key provisions, as per the concept, include: * Expulsion is a power vested in each House of Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha). * The process typically begins with a motion alleging misconduct. * The member facing expulsion has the right to defend themselves. * A vote is taken, and a majority is usually required for expulsion. * If the motion passes, the member is expelled, and their seat becomes vacant.

  • Expulsion is a power vested in each House of Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha).
  • The process typically begins with a motion alleging misconduct.
  • The member facing expulsion has the right to defend themselves.
  • A vote is taken, and a majority is usually required for expulsion.
  • If the motion passes, the member is expelled, and their seat becomes vacant.

Exam Tip

Focus on the procedural aspects and the rights of the member facing expulsion.

3. What are the important articles related to the expulsion of a Member of Parliament?

According to the concept data, Article 101 and Article 102 of the Constitution of India are relevant as they deal with the vacation of seats in Parliament. While they don't directly mention expulsion, they provide the framework for how a seat can become vacant.

Exam Tip

Remember to connect these articles to the broader concept of parliamentary privileges and conduct.

4. How does the expulsion of a Member of Parliament work in practice?

In practice, the expulsion process begins with a motion moved by a member alleging misconduct. The Speaker/Chairman admits the motion. A debate follows where the accused member can defend themselves. Finally, a vote is taken. If a majority of the House votes in favor, the member is expelled. The seat then becomes vacant, triggering a by-election if necessary.

Exam Tip

Understand the role of the Speaker/Chairman in admitting and conducting the motion for expulsion.

5. What is the difference between expulsion and suspension of a Member of Parliament?

Expulsion is a permanent removal of a member from the House, resulting in a vacant seat. Suspension, on the other hand, is a temporary removal, usually for a specified period or until a certain condition is met. An expelled member is disqualified, while a suspended member can return after the suspension period.

Exam Tip

Pay attention to the consequences of each action - expulsion leads to disqualification, while suspension is temporary.

6. What are the limitations of the power to expel a Member of Parliament?

The power to expel is subject to judicial review. The process must adhere to the principles of natural justice, ensuring the member has a fair chance to defend themselves. The expulsion cannot violate fundamental rights or other constitutional provisions. The House must follow its own rules and procedures meticulously.

Exam Tip

Consider the potential for misuse of this power and the safeguards in place to prevent it.

7. What is the significance of the expulsion of a Member of Parliament in Indian democracy?

Expulsion is a mechanism to maintain ethical standards and the dignity of Parliament. It ensures accountability of members and upholds public trust in the institution. It serves as a deterrent against misconduct and unethical behavior by parliamentarians.

Exam Tip

Relate this to the broader principles of parliamentary democracy and the importance of ethical conduct.

8. What are the challenges in the implementation of the expulsion of a Member of Parliament?

Challenges include ensuring fairness and impartiality in the process, avoiding political vendettas, and balancing the need for accountability with the rights of the elected representative. Public perception and media influence can also complicate the process.

Exam Tip

Think about the potential for political bias and the need for objective assessment of misconduct.

9. What reforms have been suggested regarding the expulsion of a Member of Parliament?

Suggested reforms include establishing a code of conduct for parliamentarians, strengthening the ethics committee, and ensuring greater transparency in the expulsion process. Some suggest an independent body to investigate allegations of misconduct.

Exam Tip

Consider the role of ethics committees and the need for a clear and enforceable code of conduct.

10. What are some common misconceptions about the expulsion of a Member of Parliament?

A common misconception is that expulsion is solely a political decision. While politics can play a role, the process is governed by rules and procedures. Another misconception is that expulsion is easily reversible; in reality, it's a serious and consequential decision.

Exam Tip

Be prepared to differentiate between the legal and political aspects of the expulsion process.

11. How has the scrutiny of MPs' conduct evolved in recent years (2020-2024)?

In recent years (2020-2024), there has been increased scrutiny of MPs' conduct due to growing public awareness and media attention. Debates on ethical standards have intensified, leading to greater pressure for accountability. This has resulted in more frequent discussions and actions related to misconduct.

Exam Tip

Connect this trend to broader issues of governance and public trust in institutions.

12. What are frequently asked aspects related to expulsion of a Member of Parliament in UPSC exams?

Frequently asked aspects include the constitutional provisions related to vacation of seats (Article 101, Article 102), the process of expulsion, grounds for expulsion, the role of the Speaker/Chairman, and the difference between expulsion and suspension. Questions often focus on the balance between accountability and the rights of elected representatives.

Exam Tip

Focus on understanding the constitutional and procedural aspects, as well as the ethical dimensions of the issue.

Source Topic

Rahul Gandhi Criticizes Trade Deal, Faces Expulsion Call

Polity & Governance

UPSC Relevance

Expulsion of a Member of Parliament is important for UPSC exams, especially for GS-2 (Polity and Governance). It can be asked directly or indirectly. Questions can focus on the constitutional provisions, the process of expulsion, grounds for expulsion, and the role of the Speaker/Chairman. In Prelims, factual questions on Article 102 or the difference between expulsion and suspension are possible. In Mains, expect analytical questions on the ethical dimensions of expulsion, its impact on parliamentary democracy, and the balance between accountability and freedom of speech. Recent cases of expulsion or suspension are important. Understand the legal framework and the arguments for and against expulsion. This topic can also be relevant for Essay papers on ethics in public life or parliamentary democracy. It has been indirectly asked in 2017 and 2020.

Evolution of Expulsion Procedures in Indian Parliament

Key events and developments in the history of expulsion of MPs in India.

1950

First Rules of Procedure framed for Indian Parliament.

1951

H.G. Mudgal case: First instance of expulsion recommendation (accepted resignation instead).

2005

Cash-for-query scam: Several MPs expelled for accepting bribes.

2006

Parliament amended rules to clarify expulsion process.

2020-2024

Increased scrutiny of MPs' conduct and ethical standards.

2026

Nishikant Dubey gives notice for motion seeking Rahul Gandhi's expulsion.

Connected to current news

Expulsion vs. Suspension of a Member of Parliament

A comparison of the key differences between expulsion and suspension of a Member of Parliament.

Expulsion vs. Suspension

FeatureExpulsionSuspension
DurationPermanent removalTemporary removal
EffectSeat becomes vacantMember is temporarily barred from attending sessions
GroundsSerious misconduct, unethical behaviorDisorderly conduct, violation of rules
Legal BasisRules of Procedure and Conduct of BusinessRules of Procedure and Conduct of Business
Impact on MembershipDisqualification from being a memberNo impact on membership after suspension period

💡 Highlighted: Row 1 is particularly important for exam preparation