Skip to main content
GKSolverGKSolver
HomeExam NewsMCQsMainsUPSC Prep
Login
Menu
Daily
HomeDaily NewsExam NewsStudy Plan
Practice
Essential MCQsEssential MainsUPSC PrepBookmarks
Browse
EditorialsStory ThreadsTrending
Home
Daily
MCQs
Saved
News

© 2025 GKSolver. Free AI-powered UPSC preparation platform.

AboutContactPrivacyTermsDisclaimer
GKSolverGKSolver
HomeExam NewsMCQsMainsUPSC Prep
Login
Menu
Daily
HomeDaily NewsExam NewsStudy Plan
Practice
Essential MCQsEssential MainsUPSC PrepBookmarks
Browse
EditorialsStory ThreadsTrending
Home
Daily
MCQs
Saved
News

© 2025 GKSolver. Free AI-powered UPSC preparation platform.

AboutContactPrivacyTermsDisclaimer
4 minConstitutional Provision

Evolution of Right to Privacy in India

Shows the key milestones in the recognition and development of the right to privacy in India.

1954

M.P. Sharma case: Court took a narrower view, suggesting privacy was not a fundamental right.

1962

Kharak Singh case: Similar view as M.P. Sharma case.

2017

K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India: Supreme Court declares Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right.

2023

Enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

2026

SME Forum appeals to SC on Meta data sharing, highlighting privacy concerns.

Connected to current news

This Concept in News

1 news topics

1

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data Sharing

11 February 2026

This news highlights the practical challenges of implementing the Right to Privacy in the digital age. (1) It demonstrates how the right to privacy can conflict with other legitimate interests, such as economic development and business competitiveness. (2) The case challenges the assumption that data sharing is always beneficial, forcing a closer examination of the potential harms to individual privacy. (3) The news reveals the complexity of regulating data practices in a globalized world, where data flows across borders and companies operate in multiple jurisdictions. (4) The implications of this news for the future of the Right to Privacy are significant, as it could shape the legal standards for data collection and use. (5) Understanding the Right to Privacy is crucial for analyzing this news because it provides the legal and ethical framework for evaluating the competing interests and potential harms involved. Without this understanding, it is difficult to assess the validity of the SME Forum's arguments or the potential impact of a ban on data sharing.

4 minConstitutional Provision

Evolution of Right to Privacy in India

Shows the key milestones in the recognition and development of the right to privacy in India.

1954

M.P. Sharma case: Court took a narrower view, suggesting privacy was not a fundamental right.

1962

Kharak Singh case: Similar view as M.P. Sharma case.

2017

K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India: Supreme Court declares Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right.

2023

Enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

2026

SME Forum appeals to SC on Meta data sharing, highlighting privacy concerns.

Connected to current news

This Concept in News

1 news topics

1

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data Sharing

11 February 2026

This news highlights the practical challenges of implementing the Right to Privacy in the digital age. (1) It demonstrates how the right to privacy can conflict with other legitimate interests, such as economic development and business competitiveness. (2) The case challenges the assumption that data sharing is always beneficial, forcing a closer examination of the potential harms to individual privacy. (3) The news reveals the complexity of regulating data practices in a globalized world, where data flows across borders and companies operate in multiple jurisdictions. (4) The implications of this news for the future of the Right to Privacy are significant, as it could shape the legal standards for data collection and use. (5) Understanding the Right to Privacy is crucial for analyzing this news because it provides the legal and ethical framework for evaluating the competing interests and potential harms involved. Without this understanding, it is difficult to assess the validity of the SME Forum's arguments or the potential impact of a ban on data sharing.

  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Concepts
  4. /
  5. Constitutional Provision
  6. /
  7. Fundamental Rights (Right to Privacy)
Constitutional Provision

Fundamental Rights (Right to Privacy)

What is Fundamental Rights (Right to Privacy)?

The Right to Privacy is a fundamental right in India, protecting an individual's personal information and choices from unwanted intrusion. It is not explicitly mentioned in the original Constitution of India but was recognized by the Supreme Court in the landmark 2017 case, *K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India*. This right stems from Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and other fundamental rights like Article 19 (Freedom of Speech and Expression). The right to privacy ensures individuals can make decisions about their bodies, personal data, and private lives without undue interference from the government or private entities. It is subject to reasonable restrictions, meaning the government can impose limitations under specific circumstances, such as national security or public order, as long as these restrictions are backed by law and are necessary and proportionate. , within reasonable limits.

Historical Background

Before 2017, the existence of a fundamental right to privacy was debated. Several court cases touched upon the issue, but there was no clear consensus. The *M.P. Sharma case (1954)* and *Kharak Singh case (1962)* took a narrower view, suggesting privacy was not a fundamental right. However, later judgments hinted at its importance. The *K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India* case arose from challenges to the Aadhaar scheme, with petitioners arguing that the collection and use of biometric data violated privacy. In 2017, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right, intrinsic to Article 21 of the Constitution. This landmark judgment clarified the legal position and paved the way for further legislation and judicial interpretations related to privacy. The judgment emphasized the importance of data protection and the need for a robust legal framework to safeguard personal information in the digital age.

Key Points

12 points
  • 1.

    The Right to Privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Constitution.

  • 2.

    It is also connected to other fundamental rights, such as Article 14 (Equality before Law) and Article 19 (Freedom of Speech and Expression).

  • 3.

    The government can impose reasonable restrictions on the right to privacy only if there is a law, a legitimate state interest, and the restriction is proportionate to the objective.

  • 4.

    The *K.S. Puttaswamy* judgment recognized informational privacy, bodily autonomy, and privacy of choice as key aspects of the right to privacy.

  • 5.

Visual Insights

Evolution of Right to Privacy in India

Shows the key milestones in the recognition and development of the right to privacy in India.

The right to privacy was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was recognized as a fundamental right by the Supreme Court in the K.S. Puttaswamy case.

  • 1954M.P. Sharma case: Court took a narrower view, suggesting privacy was not a fundamental right.
  • 1962Kharak Singh case: Similar view as M.P. Sharma case.
  • 2017K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India: Supreme Court declares Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right.
  • 2023Enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023
  • 2026SME Forum appeals to SC on Meta data sharing, highlighting privacy concerns.

Recent Real-World Examples

1 examples

Illustrated in 1 real-world examples from Feb 2026 to Feb 2026

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data Sharing

11 Feb 2026

This news highlights the practical challenges of implementing the Right to Privacy in the digital age. (1) It demonstrates how the right to privacy can conflict with other legitimate interests, such as economic development and business competitiveness. (2) The case challenges the assumption that data sharing is always beneficial, forcing a closer examination of the potential harms to individual privacy. (3) The news reveals the complexity of regulating data practices in a globalized world, where data flows across borders and companies operate in multiple jurisdictions. (4) The implications of this news for the future of the Right to Privacy are significant, as it could shape the legal standards for data collection and use. (5) Understanding the Right to Privacy is crucial for analyzing this news because it provides the legal and ethical framework for evaluating the competing interests and potential harms involved. Without this understanding, it is difficult to assess the validity of the SME Forum's arguments or the potential impact of a ban on data sharing.

Related Concepts

Competition LawDigital Economy

Source Topic

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data Sharing

Economy

UPSC Relevance

The Right to Privacy is highly relevant for the UPSC exam. It is important for GS-2 (Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International relations) and GS-3 (Technology, Economic Development, Bio diversity, Environment, Security & Disaster Management). Questions can be asked in both Prelims and Mains. In Prelims, factual questions about the *Puttaswamy* judgment, relevant articles, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act are common. In Mains, analytical questions about the scope of the right, its limitations, and its impact on various sectors are frequently asked. Recent years have seen questions on data protection, surveillance, and the balance between privacy and national security. For the Essay paper, privacy can be a relevant topic, especially in the context of technology and governance. When answering questions, focus on the constitutional basis, the legal framework, and the practical implications of the right to privacy. Also, mention recent developments and landmark judgments.

On This Page

DefinitionHistorical BackgroundKey PointsVisual InsightsReal-World ExamplesRelated ConceptsUPSC RelevanceSource Topic

Source Topic

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data SharingEconomy

Related Concepts

Competition LawDigital Economy
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Concepts
  4. /
  5. Constitutional Provision
  6. /
  7. Fundamental Rights (Right to Privacy)
Constitutional Provision

Fundamental Rights (Right to Privacy)

What is Fundamental Rights (Right to Privacy)?

The Right to Privacy is a fundamental right in India, protecting an individual's personal information and choices from unwanted intrusion. It is not explicitly mentioned in the original Constitution of India but was recognized by the Supreme Court in the landmark 2017 case, *K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India*. This right stems from Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and other fundamental rights like Article 19 (Freedom of Speech and Expression). The right to privacy ensures individuals can make decisions about their bodies, personal data, and private lives without undue interference from the government or private entities. It is subject to reasonable restrictions, meaning the government can impose limitations under specific circumstances, such as national security or public order, as long as these restrictions are backed by law and are necessary and proportionate. , within reasonable limits.

Historical Background

Before 2017, the existence of a fundamental right to privacy was debated. Several court cases touched upon the issue, but there was no clear consensus. The *M.P. Sharma case (1954)* and *Kharak Singh case (1962)* took a narrower view, suggesting privacy was not a fundamental right. However, later judgments hinted at its importance. The *K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India* case arose from challenges to the Aadhaar scheme, with petitioners arguing that the collection and use of biometric data violated privacy. In 2017, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right, intrinsic to Article 21 of the Constitution. This landmark judgment clarified the legal position and paved the way for further legislation and judicial interpretations related to privacy. The judgment emphasized the importance of data protection and the need for a robust legal framework to safeguard personal information in the digital age.

Key Points

12 points
  • 1.

    The Right to Privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Constitution.

  • 2.

    It is also connected to other fundamental rights, such as Article 14 (Equality before Law) and Article 19 (Freedom of Speech and Expression).

  • 3.

    The government can impose reasonable restrictions on the right to privacy only if there is a law, a legitimate state interest, and the restriction is proportionate to the objective.

  • 4.

    The *K.S. Puttaswamy* judgment recognized informational privacy, bodily autonomy, and privacy of choice as key aspects of the right to privacy.

  • 5.

Visual Insights

Evolution of Right to Privacy in India

Shows the key milestones in the recognition and development of the right to privacy in India.

The right to privacy was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was recognized as a fundamental right by the Supreme Court in the K.S. Puttaswamy case.

  • 1954M.P. Sharma case: Court took a narrower view, suggesting privacy was not a fundamental right.
  • 1962Kharak Singh case: Similar view as M.P. Sharma case.
  • 2017K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India: Supreme Court declares Right to Privacy a Fundamental Right.
  • 2023Enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023
  • 2026SME Forum appeals to SC on Meta data sharing, highlighting privacy concerns.

Recent Real-World Examples

1 examples

Illustrated in 1 real-world examples from Feb 2026 to Feb 2026

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data Sharing

11 Feb 2026

This news highlights the practical challenges of implementing the Right to Privacy in the digital age. (1) It demonstrates how the right to privacy can conflict with other legitimate interests, such as economic development and business competitiveness. (2) The case challenges the assumption that data sharing is always beneficial, forcing a closer examination of the potential harms to individual privacy. (3) The news reveals the complexity of regulating data practices in a globalized world, where data flows across borders and companies operate in multiple jurisdictions. (4) The implications of this news for the future of the Right to Privacy are significant, as it could shape the legal standards for data collection and use. (5) Understanding the Right to Privacy is crucial for analyzing this news because it provides the legal and ethical framework for evaluating the competing interests and potential harms involved. Without this understanding, it is difficult to assess the validity of the SME Forum's arguments or the potential impact of a ban on data sharing.

Related Concepts

Competition LawDigital Economy

Source Topic

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data Sharing

Economy

UPSC Relevance

The Right to Privacy is highly relevant for the UPSC exam. It is important for GS-2 (Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International relations) and GS-3 (Technology, Economic Development, Bio diversity, Environment, Security & Disaster Management). Questions can be asked in both Prelims and Mains. In Prelims, factual questions about the *Puttaswamy* judgment, relevant articles, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act are common. In Mains, analytical questions about the scope of the right, its limitations, and its impact on various sectors are frequently asked. Recent years have seen questions on data protection, surveillance, and the balance between privacy and national security. For the Essay paper, privacy can be a relevant topic, especially in the context of technology and governance. When answering questions, focus on the constitutional basis, the legal framework, and the practical implications of the right to privacy. Also, mention recent developments and landmark judgments.

On This Page

DefinitionHistorical BackgroundKey PointsVisual InsightsReal-World ExamplesRelated ConceptsUPSC RelevanceSource Topic

Source Topic

SME Forum Appeals to SC on Meta Data SharingEconomy

Related Concepts

Competition LawDigital Economy

The Information Technology Act, 2000 and its amendments provide some legal framework for data protection, but they were considered insufficient before the enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

  • 6.

    The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 aims to regulate the processing of digital personal data and protect individuals' rights.

  • 7.

    The right to privacy is not absolute and can be restricted in cases of national security, prevention of crime, or protection of public health.

  • 8.

    The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of data minimization, purpose limitation, and storage limitation in data processing.

  • 9.

    The right to privacy applies to both the state and private entities, although the standards for restricting the right may differ.

  • 10.

    The right to be forgotten, which allows individuals to have their personal data removed from the internet under certain circumstances, is considered an aspect of the right to privacy.

  • 11.

    The right to privacy includes the right to control the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data.

  • 12.

    The right to privacy is essential for maintaining individual dignity and autonomy in a democratic society.

  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 and its amendments provide some legal framework for data protection, but they were considered insufficient before the enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

  • 6.

    The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 aims to regulate the processing of digital personal data and protect individuals' rights.

  • 7.

    The right to privacy is not absolute and can be restricted in cases of national security, prevention of crime, or protection of public health.

  • 8.

    The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of data minimization, purpose limitation, and storage limitation in data processing.

  • 9.

    The right to privacy applies to both the state and private entities, although the standards for restricting the right may differ.

  • 10.

    The right to be forgotten, which allows individuals to have their personal data removed from the internet under certain circumstances, is considered an aspect of the right to privacy.

  • 11.

    The right to privacy includes the right to control the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data.

  • 12.

    The right to privacy is essential for maintaining individual dignity and autonomy in a democratic society.