What is Sarkaria Commission?
Historical Background
Key Points
9 points- 1.
Recommended that the Governor should be an eminent person from outside the state.
- 2.
Suggested that the Governor should be appointed after consultation with the Chief Minister.
- 3.
Advocated for greater financial autonomy for the states.
- 4.
Emphasized the need for a permanent Inter-State Council.
- 5.
Recommended that Article 356 (President's Rule) should be used sparingly.
- 6.
Suggested that the Union government should consult the states before enacting laws on subjects in the Concurrent List.
- 7.
Recommended that the states should be given a greater share of central taxes.
- 8.
Emphasized the importance of cooperative federalism.
- 9.
The report was submitted in 1988 and contained 247 recommendations.
Visual Insights
Key Recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission
Key statistics and recommendations from the Sarkaria Commission report on Centre-State relations.
- Year of Establishment
- 1983
- Year of Report Submission
- 1988
- Total Recommendations
- 247
- Recommendation on Governor Appointment
- Consultation with CM
Marks the beginning of a comprehensive review of Centre-State relations.
The year the commission submitted its comprehensive report.
Highlights the extensive scope of the commission's work.
A key recommendation to ensure better Centre-State coordination.
Recent Developments
4 developmentsMany of the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission have been implemented over the years.
The Inter-State Council was established in 1990 based on the commission's recommendation.
The debate on Centre-State relations continues to be relevant in Indian politics.
The Punchhi Commission was set up in 2007 to further examine Centre-State relations.
This Concept in News
1 topicsFrequently Asked Questions
121. What is the Sarkaria Commission and why was it established?
The Sarkaria Commission was established in 1983 by the central government to review the arrangements between the Union and the States. It was set up in response to demands for greater state autonomy and concerns about the centralization of power.
2. What were the key recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission regarding the role of the Governor?
The Sarkaria Commission made the following key recommendations regarding the role of the Governor: * The Governor should be an eminent person from outside the state. * The Governor should be appointed after consultation with the Chief Minister.
- •The Governor should be an eminent person from outside the state.
- •The Governor should be appointed after consultation with the Chief Minister.
Exam Tip
Remember the two key recommendations related to the Governor's appointment and qualifications.
3. What is the significance of the Sarkaria Commission's recommendation for establishing a permanent Inter-State Council?
The Sarkaria Commission emphasized the need for a permanent Inter-State Council to facilitate consultation and cooperation between the Union and the States. This council was established in 1990 and provides a platform for discussing important issues related to Centre-State relations.
4. What were the Sarkaria Commission's recommendations regarding Article 356 (President's Rule)?
The Sarkaria Commission recommended that Article 356 (President's Rule) should be used sparingly. This means it should only be invoked as a last resort when there is a breakdown of constitutional machinery in a state.
Exam Tip
Remember that the commission advocated for the limited use of Article 356.
5. How does the Sarkaria Commission's report contribute to understanding Centre-State relations in India?
The Sarkaria Commission's report provides a comprehensive analysis of the existing arrangements between the Union and the States. It offers recommendations for improving cooperation, resolving conflicts, and promoting greater autonomy for the states within the framework of the Constitution.
6. What are the challenges in implementing all the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission?
Implementing all the recommendations faces challenges such as political will, differing interpretations of Centre-State relations, and the need for consensus among various stakeholders. Some recommendations may also require constitutional amendments, which can be difficult to achieve.
7. What is the importance of the Sarkaria Commission for UPSC GS Paper 2?
The Sarkaria Commission is important for UPSC GS Paper 2 (Polity and Governance) because questions are frequently asked about its recommendations and their impact on Centre-State relations. It is relevant for both Prelims and Mains.
8. What is the legal framework within which the Sarkaria Commission operated?
The Sarkaria Commission operated within the Terms of Reference issued by the Government of India in 1983 and the Constitution of India (various articles related to Centre-State relations).
9. What reforms have been suggested beyond the Sarkaria Commission's recommendations to improve Centre-State relations?
Beyond the Sarkaria Commission, suggestions include greater fiscal devolution to states, enhanced consultation mechanisms, and reforms in the All India Services to ensure impartiality and accountability.
10. What is the significance of the Sarkaria Commission in Indian democracy?
The Sarkaria Commission is significant because it addresses the crucial issue of Centre-State relations, which is fundamental to the functioning of Indian democracy. Its recommendations aim to balance the powers between the Union and the States, promoting cooperative federalism.
11. What are common misconceptions about the Sarkaria Commission?
A common misconception is that all of the Sarkaria Commission's recommendations have been fully implemented. In reality, while some recommendations have been implemented, others are still under consideration or have not been implemented due to various reasons.
12. How does the debate on Centre-State relations, as informed by the Sarkaria Commission, continue to be relevant in Indian politics today?
The debate continues to be relevant because issues such as resource allocation, legislative powers, and the role of the Governor remain contentious. State governments continue to seek greater autonomy, while the Union government seeks to maintain national unity and integrity. The Sarkaria Commission's recommendations provide a framework for addressing these issues.
